×

Anisotropic models are unitary: a rejuvenation of standard quantum cosmology. (English) Zbl 1432.83066

Summary: The present work proves that the folklore of the pathology of non-conservation of probability in quantum anisotropic models is wrong. It is shown in full generality that all operator ordering can lead to a Hamiltonian with a self-adjoint extension as long as it is constructed as a symmetric operator. It is indicated that the self-adjoint extension, however, is not unique and this non-uniqueness is suspected not to be a feature of anisotropic models only, in the sense that there exists operator orderings such that Hamiltonian for an isotropic homogeneous cosmological model does not have unique self-adjoint extension. For isotropic model, there is a special unique extension associated with quadratic form of Hamiltonian, i.e., a Friedrich’s extension. Details of calculations are carried out for a Bianchi III model as an example.{
©2016 American Institute of Physics}

MSC:

83F05 Relativistic cosmology
81T20 Quantum field theory on curved space or space-time backgrounds

References:

[1] Pinto-Neto, N.; Fabris, J. C., Classical Quantum Gravity, 30, 143001 (2013) · Zbl 1273.83003 · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/30/14/143001
[2] Wiltshire, D. L., Cosmology: The Physics of the Universe, 16, 473-531 (1996)
[3] Halliwell, J. J.; Coleman, S.; Hartle, J. B.; Piran, T.; Weinberg, S., Quantum Cosmology and Baby Universes (1991)
[4] Lidsey, J. E., Phys. Lett. B, 352, 207 (1995) · doi:10.1016/0370-2693(95)00494-6
[5] Pinto-Neto, N.; Velasco, A. F.; Collistete, R. Jr., Phys. Lett. A, 277, 194 (2000) · doi:10.1016/S0375-9601(00)00706-4
[6] Kuchar, K. V.; Ashtekar, A.; Stachel, J., Conceptual Problems in Quantum Gravity (1991)
[7] Isham, C. J.; Ibort, L. A.; Rodriguez, M. A., Integrable Systems, Quantum Groups and Quantum Field Theory (1993)
[8] Rovelli, C., Found. Phys., 41, 1475 (2011) · Zbl 1242.83107 · doi:10.1007/s10701-011-9561-4
[9] Anderson, E.; Frignanni, V. R., Classical and Quantum Gravity: Theory, Analysis and Applications (2012)
[10] Schutz, B. F., Phys. Rev. D, 2, 2762 (1970) · Zbl 1227.83022 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.2.2762
[11] Schutz, B. F., Phys. Rev. D, 4, 3559 (1971) · doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.4.3559
[12] Lapchinskii, V. G.; Rubakov, V. A., Theor. Math. Phys., 33, 1076 (1977) · doi:10.1007/BF01036991
[13] Alvarenga, F. G.; Batista, A. B.; Fabris, J. C.; Goncalves, S. V. B., Gen. Relativ. Gravitation, 35, 1639 (2003) · Zbl 1033.83016 · doi:10.1023/A:1025735202959
[14] Majumder, B.; Banerjee, N., Gen. Relativ. Gravitation, 45, 1 (2013) · Zbl 1260.83115 · doi:10.1007/s10714-012-1446-0
[15] Pal, S.; Banerjee, N., Phys. Rev. D, 90, 104001 (2014) · doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.90.104001
[16] Pal, S.; Banerjee, N., Phys. Rev. D., 91, 044042 (2015) · doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.044042
[17] Pal, S.; Banerjee, N., Classical Quantum Gravity, 32, 205005 (2015) · Zbl 1327.83285 · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/32/20/205005
[18] Pal, S., Classical Quantum Gravity, 33, 045007 (2016) · Zbl 1338.83083 · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/33/4/045007
[19] Almeida, C. R.; Batista, A. B.; Fabris, J. C.; Moniz, P. R. L. V., Gravit. Cosmol., 21, 191 (2015) · Zbl 1327.83257 · doi:10.1134/S0202289315030020
[20] Rovelli, C., Quantum Gravity (2004)
[21] Thiemann, Th., Modern Canonican Quantum General Relativity (2007) · Zbl 1129.83004
[22] Bastos, C.; Bertolami, O.; Dias, N. C.; Prata, J. N., Phys. Rev. D, 78, 023516 (2008) · Zbl 1176.83060 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.78.023516
[23] Reed, M.; Simon, B., Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics, 2 (1975) · Zbl 0308.47002
[24] Falciano, F. T.; Pinto-Neto, N.; Struyve, W., Phys. Rev. D, 91, 043524 (2015) · doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.043524
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.