×

Rheology of a suspension of conducting particles in a magnetic field. (English) Zbl 1419.76658

Summary: When a suspension of conducting particles is sheared in a magnetic field, the fluid vorticity causes particle rotation. Eddy currents are induced in a conductor rotating in a magnetic field, resulting in magnetic moment, and a magnetic torque due to the external field. In the absence of inertia, the angular velocity of a particle is determined from the condition that the sum of the hydrodynamic and magnetic torques is zero. When the particle angular velocity is different from the fluid rotation rate, the torque exerted by the particles on the fluid results in an antisymmetric particle stress. The stress is of the form \(\sigma^{(p)}=|\omega| (\eta_c^{(1)}(\hat{\epsilon}:\hat{\omega}) + \eta_c^{(2)} \hat{\epsilon} : (\hat{H}-\hat{\omega}(\hat{\omega}\cdot\hat{H}))/(\sqrt{1-(\hat{\omega}\cdot\hat{H})^2)} + \eta_c^{(3)} (\hat{\omega}\hat{H} - \hat{H}\hat{\omega}) / \sqrt{1-(\hat{\omega}\cdot\hat{H})^2)}\), where \(\omega\) is the fluid vorticity at the centre of the particle, \(\hat{\omega}\) and \(\hat{H}\) are the unit vectors in the direction of the fluid vorticity and the magnetic field, \(\hat{\varepsilon}\) is the third order Levi-Civita antisymmetric tensor and \(\eta_c^{(1)}\), \(\eta_c^{(2)}\) and \(\eta_c^{(3)}\) are called the first, second and third couple stress coefficients. The stress proportional to \(\eta_c^{(1)}\) is in the plane perpendicular to \(\hat{\omega}\), that proportional to \(\eta_c^{(2)}\) is in the plane perpendicular to the unit normal to \(\hat{\omega}\) in the \(\hat{\omega}-\hat{H}\) plane, and that proportional to \(\eta_c^{(3)}\) is in the \(\hat{\omega}-\hat{H}\) plane. A relation \(\eta_c^{(2)} =-(\hat{\omega}\cdot\hat{H}_c^{(1)}/ \sqrt{1-(\hat{\omega}\cdot \hat{H})^2})\) results from the condition that the component of the eddy current torque along the magnetic field is zero. The couple stress coefficients are obtained for two geometries, a uniform spherical particle of radius \(R\) and a thin spherical shell of radius \(R\) and thickness \(\delta R\) with \(\delta \ll 1\), in the dilute (non-interacting) limit in the absence of fluid inertia. These couple stress coefficients are functions of two dimensionless parameters, \(\Sigma =(\mu_0 H^2_0 /4 \pi\eta |\omega|)\), the ratio of the characteristic magnetic and hydrodynamic torques, and \(\beta\), the product of the vorticity and current relaxation time. Here \(\mu_0\) is the magnetic permeability, \(H_0\) is the magnetic field and \(\eta\) is the fluid viscosity. The parameter \(\beta\) has the form \( \beta_p = (|\omega| \mu_0 R^2 / 2\varrho) \) for a uniform particle and \(\beta_s = (|\omega|\mu_0 R^2 \delta / 2\varrho)\) for a thin shell, where \(\varrho\) is the electrical resistivity. Scaled couple stress coefficients are defined, \(\eta^*_1 (\eta^{(1)}_c) / ((3\eta\phi /2)(1-(\hat{\omega}\cdot\hat{H})^2))) \) and \(\eta^*_3 = (\eta^{(3)}_c / ((2\phi\eta /2)\hat{\omega} \cdot \hat{H} \sqrt{1- (\hat{\omega} \cdot \hat{H})^2)})\), which are independent of the fluid viscosity and the particle volume fraction, and which do not depend on \(\hat{\omega}\) and \(\hat{H}\) in the limits \(\Sigma\ll 1\) and \(\Sigma \gg 1\). Here, \(\phi\) is the volume fraction of the particles. Asymptotic analysis is used to determine the couple stress coefficients in the limits \(\Sigma \ll 1\) and \(\Sigma \gg 1\), and a numerical solution procedure is formulated for \(\Sigma\sim 1\). For \(\Sigma \ll 1\), the particle angular velocity is aligned close to the fluid vorticity, and the scaled couple stress coefficients are \(\Sigma\) times a function of \(\beta\). For \(\Sigma\gg 1\), the particle angular velocity is aligned close to the magnetic field, \(\eta_1^*\rightarrow 1\) and \(\eta^*_3\propto\Sigma^{-1}\). When the magnetic field is perpendicular to the fluid vorticity, \(\omega \cdot \hat{H}=0\), the particle angular velocity is aligned along the vorticity, and only the first couple stress coefficient is non-zero. For high \(\beta\), there are multiple solutions for the couple stress coefficient. Multiple steady states are also observed for a near perpendicular magnetic field, \(\hat{\omega} \cdot \hat{H}<(1/3)\), for a reason different from that for a perpendicular magnetic field. Asymptotic analysis is used to explain the existence of multiple steady states in both cases.

MSC:

76T20 Suspensions
76W05 Magnetohydrodynamics and electrohydrodynamics
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Anupama, A. V.; Kumaran, V.; Sahoo, B., Magnetorheological fluids containing rod-shaped lithium – zinc ferrite particles: the steady-state shear response, Soft Matt., 14, 5407-5419, (2018)
[2] Batchelor, G. K., The stress in a suspension of force-free particles, J. Fluid Mech., 41, 545-570, (1970) · Zbl 0193.25702
[3] Batchelor, G. K., Sedimentation in a dilute dispersion of spheres, J. Fluid Mech., 52, 245-268, (1972) · Zbl 0252.76069
[4] Bolcato, R.; Etay, J.; Fautrelle, Y.; Moffatt, H. K., Electromagnetic billiards, Phys. Fluids A, 5, 1852-1853, (1993)
[5] Bossis, G.; Lemaire, E.; Volkova, O.; Clercx, H., Yield stress in magnetorheological and electrorheological fluids: a comparison between microscopic and macroscopic structural models, J. Rheol., 41, 687-704, (1997)
[6] Caflisch, R. E.; Luke, J. H. C., Variance in the sedimentation speed of a suspension, Phys. Fluids, 28, 759-760, (1985) · Zbl 0586.76044
[7] Guazzelli, E.; Hinch, J., Fluctuations and instability in sedimentation, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 43, 1, 97-116, (2011) · Zbl 1299.76285
[8] Habib, S.; Holz, D. E.; Kheyfets, A.; Matzner, R. A.; Miller, W. A.; Tolman, B. W., Spin dynamics of the LAGEOS satellite in support of a measurement of the Earth’s gravitomagnetism, Phys. Rev. D, 50, 6068-6079, (1994)
[9] Halverson, R. P.; Cohen, H., Torque on a spinning hollow sphere in a uniform magnetic field, IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Navig. Electron., ANE‐11, 118-122, (1964)
[10] Hinch, E. J., An averaged equation approach to particle interactions in a fluid suspension, J. Fluid Mech., 83, 695-720, (1977) · Zbl 0374.76038
[11] Hjortstam, O.; Isberg, P.; Söderholm, S.; Dai, H., Can we achieve ultra-low resistivity in carbon nanotube-based metal composites?, Appl. Phys. A, 78, 1175-1179, (2004)
[12] Ho, B. P.; Leal, L. G., Inertial migration of rigid spheres in two dimensional unidirectional flows, J. Fluid Mech., 65, 365-400, (1974) · Zbl 0284.76076
[13] Hogg, A. J., The inertial migration of non-neutrally buoyant spherical particles in two-dimensional shear flows, J. Fluid Mech., 272, 285-318, (1994) · Zbl 0823.76086
[14] Holdeman, L. B.1975 Magnetic torque on a rotating superconducting sphere. NASA Tech. Rep. TR R-443. National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
[15] Jansons, K. M., Determination of the constitutive equations for a magnetic fluid, J. Fluid Mech., 137, 187-216, (1983) · Zbl 0549.76070
[16] Klingenberg, D. J., Magnetorheology: applications and challenges, AIChE J., 47, 246-249, (2001)
[17] Klingenberg, D. J.; Zukoski, C. F., Studies on the steady-shear behavior of electrorheological suspensions, Langmuir, 6, 15-24, (1990)
[18] Koch, D. L.; Shaqfeh, E. S. G., Screening in sedimenting suspensions, J. Fluid Mech., 224, 275-303, (1991) · Zbl 0721.76031
[19] Kuzhir, P.; Lopez-Lopez, M. T.; Bossis, G., Magnetorheology of fiber suspensions. II. Theory, J. Rheol., 53, 127-151, (2009)
[20] Landau, L. D.; Lifshitz, E. M.; Pitaevskii, L. P., Electrodynamics of Continuous Media, (2014), Butterworth-Heinemann
[21] Lopez-Lopez, M. T.; Kuzhir, P.; Bossis, G., Magnetorheology of fiber suspensions. I. Experimental, J. Rheol., 53, 115-126, (2009)
[22] Mindlin, R. D.; Tiersten, H. F., Effects of couple-stresses in linear elasticity, Arch. Rat. Mech. Anal., 11, 415-448, (1962) · Zbl 0112.38906
[23] Moffat, H. K., On the behaviour of a suspension of conducting particles subjected to a time-periodic magnetic field, J. Fluid Mech., 218, 509-529, (1990) · Zbl 0706.76135
[24] Saffman, P. G., The lift on a small sphere in slow shear flow, J. Fluid Mech., 22, 384-400, (1965) · Zbl 0218.76043
[25] Schafer, R.; Heiden, C., A study of the flux density distribution in type II superconductors rotating in a magnetic field, J. Low Temp. Phys., 30, 357-387, (1978)
[26] Schumacher, K. R.; Riley, J. J.; Finlayson, B. A., Homogeneous turbulence in ferrofluids with a steady magnetic field, J. Fluid Mech., 599, 1-28, (2008) · Zbl 1151.76635
[27] Seric, I., Afkhami, S. & Kondic, L.2014Interfacial instability of thin ferrofluid films under a magnetic field. J. Fluid Mech.755, R1-1-R1-12.
[28] Sherman, S. G.; Becnel, A. C.; Wereley, N. M., Relating mason number to bingham number in magnetorheological fluids, J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 380, 98-104, (2015)
[29] Stokes, V. K., Couple stresses in fluids, Phys. Fluids, 9, 1709-1715, (1966)
[30] Truesdell, C. & Toupin, R. A.1960The classical field theories. In Handbuch der Physik (ed. Flugge, S.), pp. 545-609. Springer.
[31] Vagberg, D.; Tighe, B. P., On the apparent yield stress in non-Brownian magnetorheological fluids, Soft Matt., 13, 7207-7221, (2017)
[32] De Vicente, J.; Klingenberg, D. J.; Hidalgo-Alvarez, R., Magnetorheological fluids: a review, Soft Matt., 7, 3701-3710, (2011)
[33] De Vicente, J.; Segovia-Gutierrez, J. P.; Andablo-Reyes, E.; Vereda, F.; Hidalgo-Alvarez, R., Dynamic rheology of sphere- and rod-based magnetorheological fluids, J. Chem. Phys., 131, 19, (2009)
[34] Zheng, L.; Zheng, H.; Huo, D.; Wu, F.; Shao, L.; Zheng, Y.; Zheng, X.; Qui, X.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, Y., N-doped graphene-based copper nanocomposite with ultralow electrical resistivity and high thermal conductivity, Sci. Rep., 8, 9248, (2018)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.