×

A hierarchical model for probabilistic independent component analysis of multi-subject fMRI studies. (English) Zbl 1419.62359

Summary: An important goal in fMRI studies is to decompose the observed series of brain images to identify and characterize underlying brain functional networks. Independent component analysis (ICA) has been shown to be a powerful computational tool for this purpose. Classic ICA has been successfully applied to single-subject fMRI data. The extension of ICA to group inferences in neuroimaging studies, however, is challenging due to the unavailability of a pre-specified group design matrix. Existing group ICA methods generally concatenate observed fMRI data across subjects on the temporal domain and then decompose multi-subject data in a similar manner to single-subject ICA. The major limitation of existing methods is that they ignore between-subject variability in spatial distributions of brain functional networks in group ICA. In this article, we propose a new hierarchical probabilistic group ICA method to formally model subject-specific effects in both temporal and spatial domains when decomposing multi-subject fMRI data. The proposed method provides model-based estimation of brain functional networks at both the population and subject level. An important advantage of the hierarchical model is that it provides a formal statistical framework to investigate similarities and differences in brain functional networks across subjects, for example, subjects with mental disorders or neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson’s as compared to normal subjects. We develop an EM algorithm for model estimation where both the E-step and M-step have explicit forms. We compare the performance of the proposed hierarchical model with that of two popular group ICA methods via simulation studies. We illustrate our method with application to an fMRI study of Zen meditation.

MSC:

62P10 Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis
62H25 Factor analysis and principal components; correspondence analysis
92C55 Biomedical imaging and signal processing

Software:

FastICA

References:

[1] Beckmann, C. and Smith, S. (2004). Probabilistic independent component analysis for functional magnetic resonance imaging. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging23, 137-152.
[2] Beckmann, C. and Smith, S. (2005). Tensorial extensions of independent component analysis for multisubject fMRI analysis. NeuroImage25, 294-311.
[3] Beckmann, C., Mackay, C., Filippini, N., and Smith, S. (2009). Group comparison of resting‐state fmri using multi‐subject ica and dual regression. Proc. HBM. San Francisco.
[4] Bell, A. and Sejnowski, T. (1995). An information‐maximization approach to blind separation and blind deconvolution. Neural Computation7, 1129-1159.
[5] Biswal, B. and Ulmer, J. (1999). Blind source separation of multiple signal sources of fMRI data sets using independent component analysis. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography23, 265-271.
[6] Bullmore, E., Brammer, M., Williams, S., Rabe‐Hesketh, S., Janot, N., David, A., Mellers, J., Howard, R., and Sham, P. (1996). Statistical methods of estimation and inference for functional mr image analysis. Magnetic Resonance Medicine35, 261-277.
[7] Calhoun, V., Adali, T., Pearlson, G., and Pekar, J. (2001). A method for making group inferences from functional MRI data using independent component analysis. Human Brain Mapping14, 140-151.
[8] Corbetta, M. and Shulman, G. (2002). Control of goal‐directed and stimulus‐driven attention in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience3, 201-215.
[9] Delyon, B., Lavielle, V., and Moulines, E. (1999). Convergence of a stochastic approximation version of the em algorithm. Annals of Statistics27, 94-128. · Zbl 0932.62094
[10] Guo, Y. (2011). A general probabilistic model for group independent component analysis and its estimation methods. Biometrics67, 1532-1542. · Zbl 1274.62783
[11] Guo, Y. and Pagnoni, G. (2008). A unified framework for group independent component analysis for multi‐subject fMRI data. NeuroImage42, 1078-1093.
[12] Hyvärinen, A. (1999). Fast and robust fixed‐point algorithm for independent component analysis. IEEE Trans. on Neural Networks10, 626-634.
[13] Hyvärinen, A., Karhunen, J., and Oja, E. (2001). Independent Component Analysis. New York: Wiley.
[14] Kalcher, K., Huf, W., Boubela, R., Filzmoser, P., Pezawas, L., Biswal, B., Kasper, S., Moser, E., and Windischberger, C. (2012). Fully exploratory network indepdnent component analysis of the 1000 functional connectomes database. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience6, 301-311.
[15] McKeown, M., Makeig, S., Brown, G., Jung, T., Kindermann, S., Bell, A., and Sejnowski, T. (1998). Analysis of fMRI data by blind separation into independent spatial components. Human Brain Mapping6, 160-188.
[16] Meunier, D., Achard, S., Morcom, A., and Bullmore, E. (2008). Age‐related changes in modular organization of human brain functional networks. NeuroImage44, 715-723.
[17] Minka, T. (2000). Automatic choice of dimensionality for pca. Technical Report 514, MIT Media Lab.
[18] Pagnoni, G., Cekic, M., and Guo, Y. (2008). Thinking about not‐thinking”: Neural correlates of conceptual processing during zen meditation. PLoS ONE3, e3083.
[19] Raichle, M., MacLeod, A., Snyder, A., Powers, W., Gusnard, D., and Shulman, G. (2001). A default mode of brain function. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science United States of America98, 676-682.
[20] Xu, L., Cheung, C., Yang, H., and Amari, S. (1997). Maximum equalization by entropy maximization and mixture of cumulative distribution functions. In Proc. of ICNN’97, 1821-1826, Houston, TX, USA.
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.