×

Constraints on gravitation from causality and quantum consistency. (English) Zbl 1414.81024

Summary: We examine the role of consistency with causality and quantum mechanics in determining the properties of gravitation. We begin by examining two different classes of interacting theories of massless spin 2 particles-gravitons. One involves coupling the graviton with the lowest number of derivatives to matter, the other involves coupling the graviton with higher derivatives to matter, making use of the linearized Riemann tensor. The first class requires an infinite tower of terms for consistency, which is known to lead uniquely to general relativity. The second class only requires a finite number of terms for consistency, which appears as another class of theories of massless spin 2. We recap the causal consistency of general relativity and show how this fails in the second class for the special case of coupling to photons, exploiting related calculations in the literature. In a companion paper [the author and M. Sandora, J. High Energy Phys. 2017, No. 9, Paper No. 119, 28 p. (2017; Zbl 1382.83012)], this result is generalized to a much broader set of theories. Then, as a causal modification of general relativity, we add light scalar particles and recap the generic violation of universal free-fall they introduce and its quantum resolution. This leads to a discussion of a special type of scalar-tensor theory: the \(F(\mathcal{R})\) models. We show that, unlike general relativity, these models do not possess the requisite counterterms to be consistent quantum effective field theories. Together this helps to remove some of the central assumptions made in deriving general relativity.

MSC:

81P05 General and philosophical questions in quantum theory
81V17 Gravitational interaction in quantum theory
83C45 Quantization of the gravitational field
81P15 Quantum measurement theory, state operations, state preparations

Citations:

Zbl 1382.83012

References:

[1] Riess, A. G.; Filippenko, A. V.; Challis, P., Observational evidence from supernovae for an accelerating universe and a cosmological constant, The Astronomical Journal, 116, 3, 1009 (1998) · doi:10.1086/300499
[2] Wald, R. M., Spin-two fields and general covariance, Physical Review D, 33 (1986)
[3] Hertzberg, M. P.; Sandora, M., General relativity from causality, Journal of High Energy Physics, 119 (2017) · Zbl 1382.83012
[4] Schwartz, M. D., Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model (2014), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
[5] Deser, S., Self-interaction and gauge invariance, General Relativity and Gravitation, 1, 1, 9-18 (1970)
[6] Donoghue, J. F., Leading quantum correction to the Newtonian potential, Physical Review Letters, 72 (1994)
[7] Ford, L. H.; Hertzberg, M. P.; Karouby, J., Quantum gravitational force between polarizable objects, Physical Review Letters, 116, 15 (2016)
[8] Bai, D.; Xing, Y. H., Higher derivative theories for interacting massless gravitons in Minkowski spacetime, Nuclear Physics B, 932 (2018) · Zbl 1391.81115
[9] Visser, M.; Bassett, B.; Liberati, S., Superluminal censorship, Nuclear Physics B. Proceedings Supplement, 88, 267-270 (2000) · Zbl 1273.83125
[10] Adams, A.; Arkani-Hamed, N.; Dubovsky, S.; Nicolis, A.; Rattazzi, R., Causality, analyticity and an IR obstruction to UV completion, Journal of High Energy Physics, 2006 (2006)
[11] Shore, G. M., Quantum gravitational optics, Contemporary Physics, 44 (2003)
[12] Drummond, I. T.; Hathrell, S. J., Q{ED} vacuum polarization in a background gravitational field and its effect on the velocity of photons, Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, 22, 2, 343-355 (1980) · doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.22.343
[13] Camanho, X. O.; Edelstein, J. D.; Maldacena, J.; Zhiboedov, A., Causality constraints on corrections to the graviton three-point coupling, Journal of High Energy Physics, 2016, 2 (2016) · Zbl 1388.83093 · doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2016)020
[14] Schlamminger, S.; Choi, K.-Y.; Wagner, T. A.; Gundlach, J. H.; Adelberger, E. G., Test of the equivalence principle using a rotating torsion balance, Physical Review Letters, 100, 4 (2008) · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.100.041101
[15] Hui, L.; Nicolis, A., Equivalence principle for scalar forces, Physical Review Letters, 105, 23 (2010) · doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.231101
[16] Armendariz-Picon, C.; Penco, R., Quantum equivalence principle violations in scalar-tensor theories, Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, 85, 4 (2012) · doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.85.044052
[17] Starobinsky, A. A., A new type of isotropic cosmological models without singularity, Physics Letters B, 91, 1, 99-102 (1980) · Zbl 1371.83222 · doi:10.1016/0370-2693(80)90670-X
[18] Hinshaw, G., WMAP Collaboration, arXiv:1212.5226
[19] Ade, P. A. R., Planck Collaboration, arXiv:1303.5082
[20] Sotiriou, T. P.; Faraoni, V., \(f(R)\) theories of gravity, Reviews of Modern Physics, 82, 1, article 451 (2010) · Zbl 1205.83006 · doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.82.451
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.