×

Electrodiffusive flux through a stochastically gated ion channel. (English) Zbl 1411.92047

Summary: A fundamental assumption of the Hodgkin-Huxley model and other conductance-based neuron models is that the average flux of ions through a stochastically gated ion channel is the product of (a) the flux of ions through a channel that is always open and (b) the proportion of time that the gated channel is open. In this paper, we propose and analyze a model of electrodiffusion through a stochastically gated ion channel to investigate the validity of this classical assumption. We find that this assumption is valid for typical physiological parameter regimes, and we also show that it breaks down for parameters outside of typical physiological ranges. Indeed, we show that the flux through a gated channel can be orders of magnitude larger than this classical assumption if either the gating is fast or the potential difference across the membrane is large. Mathematically, our model consists of one-dimensional advection-diffusion equations with a stochastically switching boundary condition. Employing an iterated random function approach, we prove that the solution converges in distribution at large time and find (i) the support of the solution, (ii) analytical formulas for the mean solution and mean flux, and (iii) analytical formulas for the full probability distribution of the solution in various parameter regimes. All of our analysis is accompanied by numerical simulations of the stochastic PDE.

MSC:

92C20 Neural biology
92C40 Biochemistry, molecular biology
60H15 Stochastic partial differential equations (aspects of stochastic analysis)
35Q92 PDEs in connection with biology, chemistry and other natural sciences

Software:

Matlab
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] A. M. Berezhkovskii and S. M. Bezrukov, {Effect of stochastic gating on channel-facilitated transport of non-interacting and strongly repelling solutes}, J. Chem. Phys., 147 (2017), 084109.
[2] A. M. Berezhkovskii and S. Y. Shvartsman, {Diffusive flux in a model of stochastically gated oxygen transport in insect respiration}, J. Chem. Phys., 144 (2016), 204101.
[3] P. C. Bressloff and S. D. Lawley, {Moment equations for a piecewise deterministic PDE}, J. Phys. A, 48 (2015), 105001. · Zbl 1339.60078
[4] P. C. Bressloff and S. D. Lawley, {Stochastically gated diffusion-limited reactions for a small target in a bounded domain}, Phys. Rev. E (3), 92 (2015), 062117.
[5] J. R. Clay, {Excitability of the squid giant axon revisited}, J Neurophysiol., 80 (1998), pp. 903-913.
[6] D. Colquhoun and A. G. Hawkes, {On the stochastic properties of bursts of single ion channel openings and of clusters of bursts}, Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. London Ser. B, 300 (1982), pp. 1-59.
[7] H. Crauel, {Random point attractors versus random set attractors}, J. London Math. Soc. (2), 63 (2001), pp. 413-427. · Zbl 1011.37032
[8] C. R. Doering, {Effect of boundary condition fluctuations on Smoluchowski reaction rates}, in Stochastic Processes in Physics, Chemistry, and Biology, Springer, Berlin, 2000, pp. 316-326.
[9] G. B. Ermentrout and D. H. Terman, {Mathematical Foundations of Neuroscience}, Springer New York, 2012. · Zbl 1320.92002
[10] J. H. Goldwyn and E. Shea-Brown, {The what and where of adding channel noise to the Hodgkin-Huxley equations}, PLOS Comput. Biol., 7 (2011), e1002247.
[11] M. Häusser, {The Hodgkin-Huxley theory of the action potential}, Nature Neurosci., 3 (2000), pp. 1165-1165.
[12] B. Hille, {Ion channels of excitable membranes}, Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, 2001.
[13] A. L. Hodgkin and A. F. Huxley, {A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve}, J. Physiol., 117 (1952), pp. 500-544.
[14] J. P. Keener and J. Sneyd, {Mathematical Physiology: I: Cellular Physiology}, Springer, New York, 2010. · Zbl 1273.92017
[15] S. D. Lawley, {Stochastic Switching in Evolution Equations}, PhD thesis, Duke University, Durham, NC, 2014.
[16] S. D. Lawley, {Boundary value problems for statistics of diffusion in a randomly switching environment: PDE and SDE perspectives}, SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst., 15 (2016), pp. 1410-1433. · Zbl 1381.35256
[17] S. D. Lawley, {A probabilistic analysis of volume transmission in the brain}, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 78 (2018), pp. 942-962. · Zbl 1412.35345
[18] S. D. Lawley, J. Best, and M. C. Reed, {Neurotransmitter concentrations in the presence of neural switching in one dimension}, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B, 21 (2016), pp. 2255-2273. · Zbl 1346.35246
[19] S. D. Lawley, J. C. Mattingly, and M. C. Reed, {Stochastic switching in infinite dimensions with applications to random parabolic PDE}, SIAM J. Math. Anal., 47 (2015), pp. 3035-3063. · Zbl 1338.35515
[20] S. D. Lawley and V. Shankar, {Asymptotic and Numerical Analysis of a Stochastic PDE Model of Volume Transmission}, preprint, , 2018.
[21] Mathworks, {MATLAB version 8.5.0.197613 (R2015a)}, Natick, MA, 2015.
[22] J. C. Mattingly, {Ergodicity of 2D Navier-Stokes equations with random forcing and large viscosity}, Comm. Math. Phys., 206 (1999), pp. 273-288. · Zbl 0953.37023
[23] U. Moran, R. Phillips, and R. Milo, {Snapshot: Key numbers in biology}, Cell, 141 (2010), pp. 1262-1262.
[24] M. Piccolino, {Fifty years of the Hodgkin-Huxley era}, Trends in Neurosci., 25 (2002), pp. 552-553.
[25] B. Schmalfuß, {A random fixed point theorem based on Lyapunov exponents}, Random Comput. Dynam., 4 (1996), pp. 257-268. · Zbl 0876.60048
[26] A. Szabo, D. Shoup, S. H. Northrup, and J. A. McCammon, {Stochastically gated diffusion-influenced reactions}, J. Chem. Phys, 77 (1982), pp. 4484-4493.
[27] J. Wang, L. Zhang, J. Xue, and G. Hu, {Ion diffusion coefficient measurements in nanochannels at various concentrations}, Biomicrofluidics, 8 (2014), 024118.
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.