×

Optimal pricing contracts and level of information asymmetry in a supply chain. (English) Zbl 1409.90026

Summary: This study considers a stylized supply chain model consisting of a dominant supplier and a buyer, in which the latter possesses superior knowledge of his private cost information. The supplier’s imperfect knowledge about the buyer’s cost is denoted by a subjective distribution. By assuming that the distribution is uniform, we first derive the explicit expressions of the optimal equilibrium outcomes of two contract formats offered by the supplier, the simple price-only contract and sophisticated menu of contracts, respectively. Based on the optimal results, we continue to investigate how the supplier’s expected profit varies with the level of information asymmetry, which is measured by the variance of the supplier’s subjective distribution. Our findings indicate that the supplier’s expected profits initially decrease and then increase as the supplier’s knowledge of the buyer’s cost becomes increasingly uncertain. That is, if the supplier could choose the level of information asymmetry, she would prefer a symmetric case (with the variance being zero) or a totally asymmetric case (with the variance being as high as possible). Numerical experiments demonstrate that our result still holds when we take into account such distributions as a truncated gamma and normal, and a fixed support of the distribution function instead of a moving support.

MSC:

90B05 Inventory, storage, reservoirs
91B40 Labor market, contracts (MSC2010)
91B25 Asset pricing models (MSC2010)
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Babich, V., Li, H., Ritchken, P., Wang, Y., 2012. Contracting with asymmetric demand information in supply chains. European Journal of Operational Research217, 2, 333-341. · Zbl 1244.90029
[2] Baron, D.B., Myerson, R.B., 1982. Regulating a monopolist with unknown costs. Econometrica50, 4, 911-930. · Zbl 0483.90019
[3] Cachon, G.P., 2003. Supply chain coordination with contracts. In deKok (ed.), A.G. (ed.), Graves, S.C. (ed.) (eds) Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science: Supply Chain Management, Design, Coordination and Operation, Vol. 11. North Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 229-339. · Zbl 1101.90311
[4] Cachon, G.P., Lariviere, M.A., 2001. Contracting to assure supply: how to share demand forecasts in a supply chain. Management Science47, 5, 629-646. · Zbl 1232.91376
[5] Cachon, G.P., Lariviere, M.A., 2005. Supply chain coordination with revenue‐sharing contracts: strengths and limitations. Management Science52, 1, 30-44. · Zbl 1232.90173
[6] Çakanyildirim, M., Feng, Q., Gan, X.H., Sethi, S.P., 2012. Contracting and coordination under asymmetric production cost information. Production and Operations Management21, 2, 345-360.
[7] Chen, H., Chen, J., Chen, Y., 2006. A coordination mechanism for a supply chain with demand information updating. International Journal of Production Economics103, 1, 347-361.
[8] Chen, Y.J., Xiao, W.Q., 2012. Impact of reseller’s forecasting accuracy on channel member performance. Production and Operations Management21, 6, 1075-1089.
[9] Choi, S.C., 1991. Price competition in a channel structure with a common retailer. Marketing Science10, 4, 271-296.
[10] Corbett, C.J., deGroote, X., 2000. A supplier’s optimal quantity discount policy under asymmetric information. Management Science46, 3, 444-450. · Zbl 1231.90024
[11] Corbett, C.J., Zhou, D.M., Tang, C.S., 2004. Designing supply contracts: contract type and information asymmetry. Management Science50, 4, 550-559. · Zbl 1232.90036
[12] Deng, X.X., Xie, J.X., Xiong, H.C., 2013. Manufacturer‐retailer contracting with asymmetric information on retailer’s degree of loss aversion. International Journal of Production Economics142, 2, 372-380.
[13] Ebrahim‐Khanjari, N., Hopp, W., Iravani, S., 2012. Trust and information sharing in supply chains. Production and Operations Management21, 3, 444-464.
[14] Ebrahim‐Khanjari, N., Iravani, S., Shin, H., 2014. The impact of the manufacturer‐hired sales agent on a supply chain with information asymmetry. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management16, 1, 76-88.
[15] Gurnani, H., Erkoc, M., 2008. Supply contracts in manufacturer‐retailer interactions with manufacturer‐quality and retailer effort‐induced demand. Naval Research Logistics55, 3, 200-217. · Zbl 1210.90020
[16] Gurnani, H., Xu, Y., 2006. Resale price maintenance contracts with retailer sales effort: effect of flexibility and competition. Naval Research Logisitics53, 5, 448-463. · Zbl 1151.91446
[17] Ha, A.Y., 2001. Supplier‐buyer contracting: asymmetric cost information and cutoff level policy for buyer participation. Naval Research Logistics48, 1, 41-64. · Zbl 0981.90036
[18] IMSL Inc., 1994. IMSL MATH/LIBRARY User’s Manual, Version 1.0. Visual Numerics, Houston, TX.
[19] Kamien, M.I., Schwartz, N.L., 1991. Dynamic Optimization: The Calculus of Variations and Optimal Control in Economics and Management. North‐Holland, Amsterdam. · Zbl 0727.90002
[20] Kaya, O., 2011. Outsourcing vs. in‐house production: a comparison of supply chain contracts with effort dependent demand. Omega: The International Journal of Management Science39, 2, 168-178.
[21] Kayis, E., Erhun, F., Plambeck, E.L., 2013. Delegation vs. control component procurement under asymmetric cost information and simple contracts. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management15, 1, 45-56.
[22] Lau, A.H.L., Lau, H.S., Wang, J.C., 2007. Pricing and volume discounting for a dominant retailer with uncertain manufacturing cost information. European Journal of Operational Research183, 2, 848-870. · Zbl 1205.90158
[23] Lau, A.H.L., Lau, H.S., Wang, J.C., 2008. How a dominant retailer might design a purchase contract for a newsvendor‐type product with price‐sensitive demand. European Journal of Operational Research190, 2, 443-458. · Zbl 1145.91363
[24] Lau, H.S., Su, C., Wang, Y.Y., Hua, Z.S., 2012. Volume discounting coordinates a supply chain effectively when demand is sensitive to both price and sales effort. Computers & Operations Research39, 12, 3267-3280. · Zbl 1349.90544
[25] Lewis, T., Sappington, D., 1991. All‐or‐nothing information control. Economics Letters37, 2, 111-113. · Zbl 0729.90961
[26] Liu, X., Çetinkaya, S., 2009. Designing supply contracts in supplier vs buyer‐driver channels: the impact of leadership, contract flexibility and information asymmetry. IIE Transactions41, 8, 687-701.
[27] Macho‐Stadler, I., Pérez‐Castrillo, J.D., 2001. An Introduction to the Economics of Information: Incentives and Contracts. Oxford University Press, New York.
[28] Mukhopadhyay, S.K., Su, X., Ghose, S., 2009. Motivating retail marketing effort: optimal contract design. Production and Operations Research18, 2, 197-211.
[29] Nickalls, R.W.D., 1993. A new approach to solving the cubic: Cardan’s solution revealed. The Mathematical Gazette77, 480, 354-359.
[30] Pasternack, B., 1985. Optimal pricing and returns policies for perishable commodities. Marketing Science4, 2, 166-176.
[31] Porteus, E., Whang, S., 1999. Supply chain contracting: non‐recurring engineering charge, minimum order quantity and boilerplate contracts. Working Paper, Research Paper No. 1589, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
[32] Rajan, M.V., Saouma, R.E., 2006. Optimal information asymmetry. The Accounting Review81, 3, 677-712.
[33] Taylor, T.A., Xiao, W.Q., 2010. Does a manufacturer benefit from selling to a better‐forecasting retailer? Management Science56, 9, 1584-1598.
[34] Tirole, J., 1988. The Theory of Industrial Organization. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
[35] Tsay, A.A., 1999. The quantity flexibility contract and supplier‐consumer incentives. Management Science45, 10, 1339-1358. · Zbl 1231.90065
[36] Voigt, G., Inderfurth, K., 2011. Supply chain coordination and setup cost reduction in case of asymmetric information. OR Spectrum33, 1, 99-122. · Zbl 1231.90068
[37] Wang, J.C., Lau, H.S., Lau, A.H.L., 2008. How a retailer should manipulate a dominant manufacturer’s perception of market and cost parameters. International Journal of Production Economics116, 1, 43-60.
[38] Wang, Y.Y., Lau, H.S., Hua, Z.S., 2012a. Three revenue‐sharing variants: their significant performance differences under system‐parameter uncertainties. Journal of the Operational Research Society63, 12, 1752-1764.
[39] Wang, Y.Y., Lau, H.S., Wang, J.C., 2012b. Defending and improving the “slotting fee”: how it can benefit all the stakeholders dealing with a newsvendor product with price and effort‐dependent demand. Journal of the Operational Research Society63, 12, 1731-1751.
[40] Xu, H., Yao, N., Tong, S.L., 2013. Sourcing under cost information asymmetry when facing time‐sensitive customers. International Journal of Production Economics144, 2, 599-609.
[41] Xue, W., Demirag, O.C., Niu, B., 2014. Supply chain performance and consumer surplus under alternative structures of channel dominance. European Journal of Operational Research239, 1, 130-145. · Zbl 1339.90039
[42] Yan, X.H., 2015. Contract efficiency for a decentralized supply chain in the presence of quality improvement. International Transactions in Operational Research22, 4, 713-734. · Zbl 1337.90017
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.