×

Retailer’s optimal ordering policy in the EOQ model with imperfect-quality items under limited storage capacity and permissible delay. (English) Zbl 1408.90016

Summary: With a view to reducing inventory and increase sales, a supplier frequently offers its buyers a permissible delay in payment to attract new retailers for bulk purchase, and so extra storage spaces are needed for the buyers. Moreover, in a real environment, some defective items are produced because not only the production processes but also the inspection processes are not perfect, thereby generating defects then resulting in extra costs. Keeping these facts in mind, this article proposes a profit-maximizing economic order quantity model that incorporates both imperfect production quality and permissible delay in payments in the case when the own warehouse with limited capacity is not sufficient to store the ordered quantity and, therefore, a rented warehouse is needed to store the excess units over the capacity of the owned warehouse. Mathematical model and solution procedures are developed with major insight into its functional characteristics. Numerical examples and sensitivity analysis are provided to illustrate and analyze the model performances. It is observed that our model has significant impacts on the optimal lot size and the optimal profit of the mathematical model, which is considered in this article.

MSC:

90B05 Inventory, storage, reservoirs
65K05 Numerical mathematical programming methods
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] LiaoJ‐J, HuangK‐N. Deterministic inventory model for deteriorating items with trade credit financing and capacity constraints. Comput Industr Engrg. 2010;59(4):611‐618.
[2] LiaoJ‐J, ChungK‐J, HuangK‐N. A deterministic inventory model for deteriorating items with two warehouses and trade credit in a supply chain system. Internat J Prod Econ. 2013;146(2):557‐565.
[3] LiangY, ZhouF. A two‐warehouse inventory model for deteriorating items under conditionally permissible delay in payment. Appl Math Model. 2011;35(5):2221‐2231. · Zbl 1217.90015
[4] LiaoJ‐J, HuangK‐N, ChungK‐J. Lot‐sizing decisions for deteriorating items with two warehouses under an order‐size‐dependent trade credit. Internat J Prod Econ. 2012;137(1):102‐115.
[5] LiaoJ‐J, HuangK‐N, TingP‐S. Optimal strategy of deteriorating items with capacity constraints under two‐levels of trade credit policy. Appl Math Comput. 2014;233:647‐658. · Zbl 1334.90008
[6] JanaDK, MaityK, RoyTK. A two‐warehouse EOQ model for deteriorating items and stock dependent demand under conditionally permissible delay in payment in imprecise environment. Adv Model Optim. 2013;15:173‐193. · Zbl 1413.90013
[7] SinghT, PattnayakH. A two‐warehouse inventory model for deteriorating items with linear demand under conditionally permissible delay in payment. Internat J Manag Sci Engrg Manag. 2014;9(2):104‐113.
[8] SettBK, SarkarB, GoswamiA. A two‐warehouse inventory model with increasing demand and time varying deterioration. Sci Iran. 2012;19(6):1969‐1977.
[9] YenG‐F, ChungK‐J, ChenT‐C. The optimal retailer’s ordering policies with trade credit financing and limited storage capacity in the supply chain system. Internat J Syst Sci. 2012;43(11):2144‐2159. · Zbl 1308.90011
[10] YangH‐L, ChangC‐T. A two‐warehouse partial backlogging inventory model for deteriorating items with permissible delay in payment under inflation. Appl Math Model. 2013;37(5):2717‐2726. · Zbl 1351.90019
[11] ZhongY‐G, ZhouY‐W. Improving the supply chain’s performance through trade credit under inventory‐dependent demand and limited storage capacity. Internat J Prod Econ. 2013;143(2):364‐370.
[12] SoniHN. Optimal replenishment policies for deteriorating items with stock sensitive demand under two‐level trade credit and limited capacity. Appl Math Model. 2013;37(8):5887‐5895. · Zbl 1278.90037
[13] LiaoJ‐J, HuangK‐N, ChungK‐J. Optimal pricing and ordering policy for perishable items with limited storage capacity and partial trade credit. IMA J Manag Math. 2013;24(1):45‐61. · Zbl 1259.90004
[14] BhuniaAK, JaggiCK, SharmaA, SharmaR. A two‐warehouse inventory model for deteriorating items under permissible delay in payment with partial backlogging. Appl Math Comput. 2014;232:1125‐1137. · Zbl 1410.90002
[15] ChungK‐J, LiaoJ‐J, TingP‐S, LinS‐D, SrivastavaHM. The algorithm for the optimal cycle time and pricing decisions for an integrated inventory system with order‐size dependent trade credit in supply chain management. Appl Math Comput. 2015;268:322‐333. · Zbl 1410.90007
[16] ChungK‐J, LinT‐Y, SrivastavaHM. An alternative solution technique of the JIT lot‐splitting model for supply chain management. Appl Math Inform Sci. 2015;9(2):583‐591.
[17] LiaoJ‐J, HuangK‐N, ChungK‐J, TingP‐S, LinS‐D, SrivastavaHM. Some mathematical analytic arguments for determining valid optimal lot size for deteriorating items with limited storage capacity under permissible delay in payments. Appl Math Inform Sci. 2016;10:915‐925.
[18] LiaoJ‐J, HuangK‐N, ChungK‐J, TingP‐S, LinS‐D, SrivastavaHM. Lot‐sizing policies for deterioration items under two‐level trade credit with partial trade credit to credit‐risk retailer and limited storage capacity. Math Methods Appl Sci. 2017;40(6):2122‐2139. · Zbl 1409.90020
[19] SalamehMK, JaberMY. Economic production quality model for items with imperfect quantity. Internat J Prod Econ. 2000;64(1‐3):59‐64.
[20] HayekPA, SalamehMK. Production lot sizing with the reworking of imperfect quality items produced. Prod Plan Control. 2001;12(6):584‐590.
[21] WeeH‐M, YuJ, ChenM‐C. Optimal inventory model for items with imperfect quality and shortage backordering. Omega. 2007;35(1):7‐11.
[22] KhanM, JaberMY, GuiffridaAL, ZolfaghariS. A review of the extensions of a modified EOQ model for imperfect quality items. Internat J Prod Econ. 2011;132(1):1‐12.
[23] YuH‐F, HsuW‐K, ChangW‐J. EOQ model where a portion of the defectives can be used as perfect quality. Internat J Syst Sci. 2012;43(9):1689‐1698. · Zbl 1305.90044
[24] JaberMY, ZanoniS, ZavanellaLE. Economic order quantity models for imperfect items with buy and repair options. Internat J Prod Econ. 2013;155:126‐131.
[25] HsuJ‐T, HsuL‐F. An EOQ model with imperfect quality items, inspection errors, shortage backordering, and sales returns. Internat J Prod Econ. 2013;143(1):162‐170.
[26] MukhopadhyayA, GoswamiA. Application of uncertain programming to an inventory model for imperfect quantity under time varying demand. Adv Model Optim. 2013;15(3):565‐582. · Zbl 1413.90021
[27] ChungK‐J, HerC‐C, LinS‐D. A two‐warehouse inventory model with imperfect quality production processes. Comput Industr Engrg. 2009;56(1):193‐197.
[28] LinT‐Y. A two‐warehouse inventory model for items with imperfect quality and quantity discounts. Asia Pac J Oper Res. 2011;28(02):147‐161. · Zbl 1211.90021
[29] RoyMD, SanaSS, ChaudhuriKS. An economic order quantity model of imperfect quality items with partial backlogging. Internat J Syst Sci. 2011;42(8):1409‐1419. · Zbl 1233.90040
[30] ErogluA, OzdemirG. An economic order quantity model with defective items and shortages. Internat J Prod Econ. 2007;106(2):544‐549.
[31] SanaSS. Preventive maintenance and optimal buffer inventory for products sold with warranty in an imperfect production system. Internat J Prod Res. 2012;50(23):6763‐6774.
[32] TsouJ‐C, HejaziSR, BarzokiMR. Economic production quantity model for items with continuous quality characteristic, rework and reject. Internat J Syst Sci. 2012;43(12):2261‐2267. · Zbl 1304.90026
[33] JaggiCK, GoelSK, MittalM. Credit financing in economic ordering policies for defective items with allowable shortages. Appl Math Comput. 2013;219(10):5268‐5282. · Zbl 1280.90004
[34] JaberMY, GoyalSK, ImranM. Economic production quantity model for items with imperfect quality subject to learning effects. Internat J Prod Econ. 2008;115(1):143‐150.
[35] MaddahB, JaberMY. Economic order quantity for items with imperfect quality: revisited. Internat J Prod Econ. 2008;112:808‐815.
[36] MukhopadhyayA, GoswamiA. An EOQ model with imperfect items with shortages under declining demand and deterioration. Rev Bull Calcutta Math Soc. 2012;20:11‐28.
[37] ChungK‐J, HuangY‐F. Retailer’s optimal cycle times in the EOQ model with imperfect quality and a permissible credit period. Qual Quant. 2006;40(1):59‐77.
[38] OuyangL‐Y, ChangC‐T, ShumP. The EOQ with defective items and partially permissible delay in payments linked to order quantity derived algebraically. Cent Eur J Oper Res. 2012;20(1):141‐160. · Zbl 1245.90005
[39] OuyangL‐Y, ChangC‐T. Optimal production lot with imperfect production process under permissible delay in payments and complete backlogging. Internat J Prod Econ. 2013;144(2):610‐617.
[40] ChungK‐J, LiaoJ‐J, TingP‐S, LinS‐D, SrivastavaHM. A unified presentation of inventory models under quantity discounts, trade credits and cash discounts in the supply chain management. Revista de la Real Academia de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales Serie A Matemáticas (RACSAM). 2018;112(2):509‐538. · Zbl 1405.90011
[41] ChungK‐J, LinS‐D, SrivastavaHM. The complete solution procedures for the mathematical analysis of some families of optimal inventory models with order‐size dependent trade credit and deterministic and constant demand. Appl Math Comput. 2012;219(1):142‐157. · Zbl 1291.90012
[42] ChungK‐J, LinS‐D, SrivastavaHM. The inventory models under conditional trade credit in a supply chain system. Appl Math Model. 2013;37(24):10036‐10052. · Zbl 1427.90009
[43] ChungK‐J, LinS‐D, SrivastavaHM. The complete and concrete solution procedures for integrated vendor‐buyer cooperative inventory models with trade credit financing in supply chain management. Appl Math Inform Sci. 2016;10:155‐171.
[44] ChungK‐J, LinS‐D, SrivastavaH. The inventory models for deteriorating items in the discounted cash‐flows approach under conditional trade credit and cash discount in a supply chain system. Appl Math Inform Sci. 2014;8(5):2103‐2111.
[45] JaggiCK, GoelSK, MittalM. Pricing and replenishment policies for imperfect quality deteriorating items under inflation and permissible delay in payments. Internat J Strateg Decis Sci. 2011;2(2):20‐35.
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.