×

Cardinality versus \(q\)-norm constraints for index tracking. (English) Zbl 1402.91689

Summary: Index tracking aims at replicating a given benchmark with a smaller number of its constituents. Different quantitative models can be set up to determine the optimal index replicating portfolio. In this paper, we propose an alternative based on imposing a constraint on the \(q\)-norm (\(0<q<1\)) of the replicating portfolios’ asset weights: the \(q\)-norm constraint regularises the problem and identifies a sparse model. Both approaches are challenging from an optimization viewpoint due to either the presence of the cardinality constraint or a non-convex constraint on the \(q\)-norm. The problem can become even more complex when non-convex distance measures or other real-world constraints are considered. We employ a hybrid heuristic as a flexible tool to tackle both optimization problems. The empirical analysis of real-world financial data allows us to compare the two index tracking approaches. Moreover, we propose a strategy to determine the optimal number of constituents and the corresponding optimal portfolio asset weights.

MSC:

91G10 Portfolio theory
62P05 Applications of statistics to actuarial sciences and financial mathematics
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] DOI: 10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00425-3 · Zbl 1037.90038 · doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00425-3
[2] DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0904287106 · Zbl 1203.91271 · doi:10.1073/pnas.0904287106
[3] DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.03.015 · Zbl 1159.91464 · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2008.03.015
[4] Coleman T.F., J. Risk 8 pp 33– (2006) · doi:10.21314/JOR.2006.134
[5] DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1080.0986 · Zbl 1232.91617 · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1080.0986
[6] Derigs U., OR Spectrum 25 pp 345– (2003)
[7] DOI: 10.1016/0021-9991(90)90201-B · Zbl 0707.65039 · doi:10.1016/0021-9991(90)90201-B
[8] DOI: 10.1002/asm.3150080306 · doi:10.1002/asm.3150080306
[9] DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4899-4541-9 · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-4541-9
[10] DOI: 10.1007/s10287-010-0127-2 · Zbl 1273.91420 · doi:10.1007/s10287-010-0127-2
[11] DOI: 10.3905/jpm.24.2.83 · doi:10.3905/jpm.24.2.83
[12] DOI: 10.1080/00401706.1993.10485033 · doi:10.1080/00401706.1993.10485033
[13] DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4757-3613-7_9 · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-3613-7_9
[14] Gilli M., In Financial Engineering, E-Commerce, and Supply Chain pp 1– (2009)
[15] DOI: 10.1007/s10732-010-9138-y · doi:10.1007/s10732-010-9138-y
[16] DOI: 10.1002/9780470748916.ch3 · doi:10.1002/9780470748916.ch3
[17] Hoerl A.E., Technometrics 8 pp 27– (1970)
[18] DOI: 10.3905/jpm.2002.319830 · doi:10.3905/jpm.2002.319830
[19] DOI: 10.1126/science.220.4598.671 · Zbl 1225.90162 · doi:10.1126/science.220.4598.671
[20] DOI: 10.1007/s10479-009-0552-1 · Zbl 1183.91167 · doi:10.1007/s10479-009-0552-1
[21] DOI: 10.1007/s10479-006-0145-1 · Zbl 1132.91474 · doi:10.1007/s10479-006-0145-1
[22] Maringer D., Portfolio Management with Heuristic Optimization (Advances in Computational Management Science 8) (2005) · Zbl 1142.91005
[23] DOI: 10.1007/s00291-003-0139-1 · Zbl 1031.91054 · doi:10.1007/s00291-003-0139-1
[24] DOI: 10.1002/isaf.285 · doi:10.1002/isaf.285
[25] Tibshirani R., R. Statist. Soc. 58 pp 267– (1996)
[26] DOI: 10.3905/jpm.2008.701625 · doi:10.3905/jpm.2008.701625
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.