×

SOS is not obviously automatizable, even approximately. (English) Zbl 1402.90116

Papadimitriou, Christos H. (ed.), 8th innovations in theoretical computer science conference, ITCS 2017, Berkeley, CA, USA, January 9–11, 2017. Wadern: Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz Zentrum für Informatik (ISBN 978-3-95977-029-3). LIPIcs – Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics 67, Article 59, 10 p. (2017).
Summary: Suppose we want to minimize a polynomial \(p(x)=p(x_1,\ldots,x_n)\), subject to some polynomial constraints \(q_1(x),\ldots,q_m(x)\geq 0\), using the Sum-of-Squares (SOS) SDP hierarchy. Assume we are in the “explicitly bounded” (“Archimedean”) case where the constraints include \(x_i^2\leq 1\) for all \(1\leq i\leq n\). It is often stated that the degree-\(d\) version of the SOS hierarchy can be solved, to high accuracy, in time \(n^{O(d)}\). Indeed, I myself have stated this in several previous works.
The point of this note is to state (or remind the reader) that this is not obviously true. The difficulty comes not from the “\(r\)” in the ellipsoid algorithm, but from the “\(R\)”; a priori, we only know an exponential upper bound on the number of bits needed to write down the SOS solution. An explicit example is given of a degree-2 SOS program illustrating the difficulty.
For the entire collection see [Zbl 1379.68010].

MSC:

90C22 Semidefinite programming
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Farid Alizadeh. Interior point methods in semidefinite programming with applications tocombinatorial optimization. SIAM Journal on Optimization, 5(1):13-51, 1995. · Zbl 0833.90087
[2] Sarah Allen, Ryan O’Donnell, and David Witmer. How to refute a random CSP. InProceedings of the 56th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science,2015.
[3] Boaz Barak and David Steurer. Sum-of-squares proofs and the quest toward optimal al-gorithms. In Proceedings of the 2014 International Congress of Mathematicians. Interna-tional Mathematical Union, 2014. · Zbl 1373.68253
[4] Charles Delorme and Svatopluk Poljak. Laplacian eigenvalues and the maximum cut prob-lem. Mathematical Programming, 62(1-3):557-574, 1993. · Zbl 0797.90107
[5] Jack Edmonds. Systems of distinct representatives and linear algebra. Journal of Researchof the National Bureau of Standards, 71B:241-245, 1967. · Zbl 0178.03002
[6] JeffErickson.WhatistheactualtimecomplexityofGaussianelimination?http://cstheory.stackexchange.com/questions/3921/what-is-the-actual-time-complexity-of-gaussian-elimination, 2010.
[7] Dima Grigoriev. Linear lower bound on degrees of Positivstellensatz calculus proofs for theparity. Technical Report IHES/M/99/68, Insitut des Hautes Études Scientifiques, 1999.
[8] Dima Grigoriev. Complexity of Positivstellensatz proofs for the knapsack. ComputationalComplexity, 10(2):139-154, 2001. · Zbl 0992.68077
[9] Dima Grigoriev and Nicolai Vorobjov. Complexity of Null- and Positivstellensatz proofs.Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, 113(1):153-160, 2001. · Zbl 0992.03073
[10] Martin Grötschel, László Lovász, and Alexander Schrijver. The Ellipsoid Method and itsconsequences in combinatorial optimization. Combinatorica, 1(2):169-197, 1981. · Zbl 0492.90056
[11] Martin Grötschel, László Lovász, and Alexander Schrijver.Geometric Algorithms andCombinatorial Optimization. Springer-Verlag, 1988. · Zbl 0634.05001
[12] Amir Hashemi and Daniel Lazard. Sharper complexity bounds for zero-dimensional gröbnerbases and polynomial system solving. International Journal of Algebra and Computation,21(05):703-713, 2011. · Zbl 1228.13026
[13] Cédric Josz and Didier Henrion. Strong duality in Lasserre’s hierarchy for polynomialoptimization. Optimization Letters, 10(1):3-10, 2016. · Zbl 1339.90267
[14] Manuel Kauers, Ryan O’Donnell, Li-Yang Tan, and Yuan Zhou. Hypercontractive inequal-ities via SOS, and the Frankl-Rödl graph. Discrete Analysis, 4, 2016. · Zbl 1423.68347
[15] Leonid Khachiyan. Polynomial algorithms in linear programming. USSR ComputationalMathematics and Mathematical Physics, 20(1):53-72, 1980. · Zbl 0459.90047
[16] Jean Lasserre. Optimisation globale et théorie des moments. Comptes Rendus de l’Académiedes Sciences, 331(11):929-934, 2000. · Zbl 1016.90031
[17] Jean Lasserre. Global optimization with polynomials and the problem of moments. SIAMJournal on Optimization, 11(3):796-817, 2001. · Zbl 1010.90061
[18] Monique Laurent. Sums of squares, moment matrices and optimization over polynomials.Emerging Applications of Algebraic Geometry, 149:157-270, 2009. · Zbl 1163.13021
[19] László Lovász. Semidefinite programs and combinatorial optimization. In Recent advancesin algorithms and combinatorics, pages 137-194. Springer New York, 2003. doi:10.1007/0-387-22444-0_6. · Zbl 1040.90032
[20] Yurii Nesterov. Squared functional systems and optimization problems, chapter 17, pages405-440. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000. · Zbl 0958.90090
[21] Ryan O’Donnell and Franklin Ta.Linear programming and semidefinite programminglecture 10 notes, 2011.http://www.cs.cmu.edu/afs/cs.cmu.edu/academic/class/15859-f11/www/notes/lecture10.pdf.
[22] Ryan O’Donnell and Yuan Zhou. Approximability and proof complexity. In Proceedings ofthe 24th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, pages 1537-1556, 2013. · Zbl 1422.68132
[23] Pablo Parrilo. Structured Semidefinite Programs and Semialgebraic Geometry Methods inRobustness and Optimization. PhD thesis, California Institute of Technology, 2000.
[24] Lorant Porkolab and Leonid Khachiyan.On the complexity of semidefinite programs.Journal of Global Optimization, 10(4):351-365, 1997. · Zbl 0881.90127
[25] Motakuri Ramana. An exact duality theory for semidefinite programming and its complex-ity implications. Mathematical Programming, 77(1):129-162, 1997. · Zbl 0890.90144
[26] Claus Scheiderer. Sums of squares of polynomials with rational coefficients. Journal of theEuropean Mathematical Society, 18(7):1495-1513, 2016. · Zbl 1354.14036
[27] Grant Schoenebeck. Linear level Lasserre lower bounds for certain k-CSPs. In Proceedingsof the 49th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pages 593-602,2008.
[28] Naum Shor.Class of global minimum bounds of polynomial functions.Cybernetics,23(6):731-734, 1987. · Zbl 0648.90058
[29] Kuduvally Swamy. On Sylvester’s criterion for positive-semidefinite matrices. IEEE Trans-actions on Automatic Control, 18(3):306-306, 1973.
[30] Sergey Tarasov and Mikhail Vyalyi. Semidefinite programming and arithmetic circuit eval-uation. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 156(11):2070-2078, 2008. · Zbl 1163.90694
[31] :10
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.