Randomized observation periods for the compound Poisson risk model: the discounted penalty function. (English) Zbl 1401.91089
Summary: In the framework of collective risk theory, we consider a compound Poisson risk model for the surplus process where the process (and hence ruin) can only be observed at random observation times. For Erlang(\(n\)) distributed inter-observation times, explicit expressions for the discounted penalty function at ruin are derived. The resulting model contains both the usual continuous-time and the discrete-time risk model as limiting cases, and can be used as an effective approximation scheme for the latter. Numerical examples are given that illustrate the effect of random observation times on various ruin-related quantities.
MSC:
| 91B30 | Risk theory, insurance (MSC2010) |
| 62P05 | Applications of statistics to actuarial sciences and financial mathematics |
Keywords:
compound Poisson risk model; Gerber-Shiu function; erlangization; defective renewal equation; discounted densityReferences:
| [1] | Albrecher , H. , Cheung , E.C.K. & Thonhauser , S. 2010 . Randomized observation periods for the compound Poisson risk model: Dividends . ASTIN Bulletin , 41(2), 645–672 . · Zbl 1239.91072 |
| [2] | DOI: 10.1142/9789814282536 · doi:10.1142/9789814282536 |
| [3] | DOI: 10.2143/AST.32.2.1029 · Zbl 1081.60028 · doi:10.2143/AST.32.2.1029 |
| [4] | DOI: 10.1239/jap/1238592120 · Zbl 1172.91009 · doi:10.1239/jap/1238592120 |
| [5] | Cheung E.C.K., Scandinavian Actuarial Journal (3) pp 185– (2010) · doi:10.1080/03461230902884013 |
| [6] | DOI: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2009.05.009 · Zbl 1231.91157 · doi:10.1016/j.insmatheco.2009.05.009 |
| [7] | De Vylder F., Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 7 (1) pp 1– (1988) · Zbl 0629.62101 · doi:10.1016/0167-6687(88)90089-3 |
| [8] | DOI: 10.1016/S0167-6687(01)00091-9 · Zbl 1074.91549 · doi:10.1016/S0167-6687(01)00091-9 |
| [9] | Dickson D.C.M., ASTIN Bulletin 21 (2) pp 199– (1991) · doi:10.2143/AST.21.2.2005364 |
| [10] | DOI: 10.1080/10920277.1998.10595671 · Zbl 1081.60550 · doi:10.1080/10920277.1998.10595671 |
| [11] | DOI: 10.1002/asmb.713 · Zbl 1199.91084 · doi:10.1002/asmb.713 |
| [12] | DOI: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2004.01.002 · Zbl 1188.91089 · doi:10.1016/j.insmatheco.2004.01.002 |
| [13] | DOI: 10.1239/aap/1127483750 · Zbl 1077.60063 · doi:10.1239/aap/1127483750 |
| [14] | DOI: 10.1007/s10479-008-0309-2 · Zbl 1140.60357 · doi:10.1007/s10479-008-0309-2 |
| [15] | DOI: 10.2143/AST.35.1.583169 · Zbl 1123.62078 · doi:10.2143/AST.35.1.583169 |
| [16] | Stanford D.A., Scandinavian Actuarial Journal (1) pp 38– (2011) · Zbl 1277.60128 · doi:10.1080/03461230903421492 |
| [17] | DOI: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2006.08.005 · Zbl 1119.91058 · doi:10.1016/j.insmatheco.2006.08.005 |
| [18] | DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4613-0111-0 · doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-0111-0 |
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.
