×

Competitive equilibrium and singleton cores in generalized matching problems. (English) Zbl 1398.91459

Summary: We study competitive equilibria in generalized matching problems. We show that, if there is a competitive matching, then it is unique and the core is a singleton consisting of the competitive matching. That is, a singleton core is necessary for the existence of competitive equilibria. We also show that a competitive matching exists if and only if the matching produced by the top trading cycles algorithm is feasible, in which case it is the unique competitive matching. Hence, we can use the top trading cycles algorithm to test whether a competitive equilibrium exists and to construct a competitive equilibrium if one exists. Lastly, in the context of bilateral matching problems, we compare the condition for the existence of competitive matchings with existing sufficient conditions for the existence or uniqueness of stable matchings and show that it is weaker than most existing conditions for uniqueness.

MSC:

91B68 Matching models
91A12 Cooperative games
91B50 General equilibrium theory
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Abdulkadiroğlu A, Sönmez T (2013) Matching markets: theory and practice, Advances in Economics and Econometrics, vol 1, Tenth World Congress, pp 3-47 · Zbl 0715.68069
[2] Abdulkadiroğlu A, Sönmez T (2003) School choice: a mechanism design approach. Am Econ Rev 93:729-747 · doi:10.1257/000282803322157061
[3] Alcalde J (1995) Exchange-proofness or divorce-proofness? Stability in one-sided matching markets. Econ Design 1:275-287 · doi:10.1007/BF02716626
[4] Ashlagi I, Kanoria Y, Leshno JD (2015) Unbalanced random matching markets: the stark effect of competition. J Polit Econ (forthcoming) · Zbl 1202.91141
[5] Banerjee S, Konishi H, Sönmez T (2001) Core in a simple coalition formation game. Soc Choice Welfare 18:135-153 · Zbl 1069.91504 · doi:10.1007/s003550000067
[6] Bikhchandani S, Mamer JW (1997) Competitive equilibrium in an exchange economy with indivisibilities. J Econ Theory 74:385-413 · Zbl 0887.90051 · doi:10.1006/jeth.1996.2269
[7] Chung K-S (2000) On the existence of stable roommate matchings. Games Econ Behav 33:206-230 · Zbl 1047.91012 · doi:10.1006/game.1999.0779
[8] Clark S (2006) The uniqueness of stable matchings. Contrib Theor Econ 6:1-28 · doi:10.2202/1534-5971.1283
[9] Crawford VP, Knoer EM (1981) Job matching with heterogenous firms and workers. Econometrica 49:437-450 · Zbl 1202.91141 · doi:10.2307/1913320
[10] Edgeworth FY (1881) Mathematical psychics. Kegan Paul, London
[11] Eeckhout J (2000) On the uniqueness of stable marriage matchings. Econ Lett 69:1-8 · Zbl 0960.91052 · doi:10.1016/S0165-1765(00)00263-9
[12] Ehlers L, Massó J (2007) Incomplete information and singleton cores in matching markets. J Econ Theory 136:587-600 · Zbl 1281.91123 · doi:10.1016/j.jet.2006.10.007
[13] Gale D, Shapley LS (1962) College admissions and the stability of marriage. Am Math Mon 69:9-15 · Zbl 0109.24403 · doi:10.2307/2312726
[14] Gudmundsson J (2014) When do stable roommate matchings exist? A review. Rev Econ Design 18:151-161 · Zbl 1302.91155 · doi:10.1007/s10058-013-0150-1
[15] Hatfield JW, Kominers SD, Nichifor A, Ostrovsky M, Westkamp A (2013) Stability and competitive equilibrium in trading networks. J Polit Econ 121:966-1005 · doi:10.1086/673402
[16] Hungerford TW (1974) Algebra, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol 73. Springer, New York
[17] Kelso AS, Crawford VP (1982) Job matching, coalition formation, and gross substitutes. Econometrica 50:1483-1504 · Zbl 0503.90019 · doi:10.2307/1913392
[18] Kesten O (2006) On two competing mechanisms for priority-based allocation problems. J Econ Theory 127:155-171 · Zbl 1125.91019 · doi:10.1016/j.jet.2004.11.001
[19] Ma J (1994) Strategy-proofness and the strict core in a market with indivisibilities. Int J Game Theory 23:75-83 · Zbl 0804.90014 · doi:10.1007/BF01242849
[20] Ma J (2002) Stable matchings and the small core in Nash equilibrium in the college admissions problem. Rev Econ Design 7:117-134 · Zbl 1055.91003 · doi:10.1007/s100580200063
[21] Mas-Colell A, Whinston MD, Green JR (1995) Microeconomic theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford · Zbl 1256.91002
[22] Moulin H (1995) Cooperative microeconomics: a game-theoretic introduction. Princeton University Press, Princeton · doi:10.1515/9781400864140
[23] Niederle M, Yariv L (2009) Decentralized matching with aligned preferences, NBER Working Paper 14840
[24] Pathak PA, Sönmez T (2008) Leveling the playing field: sincere and sophisticated players in the Boston mechanism. Am Econ Rev 98:1636-1652 · doi:10.1257/aer.98.4.1636
[25] Quinzii M (1984) Core and competitive equilibria with indivisibilities. Int J Game Theory 13:41-61 · Zbl 0531.90012 · doi:10.1007/BF01769864
[26] Rodrigues-Neto JA (2007) Representing roommates’ preferences with symmetric utilities. J Econ Theory 135:545-550 · Zbl 1186.91153 · doi:10.1016/j.jet.2005.02.013
[27] Romero-Medina A, Triossi M (2013) Acyclicity and singleton cores in matching markets. Econ Lett 118:237-239 · Zbl 1284.91418 · doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2012.10.032
[28] Roth AE (1982a) The economics of matching: stability and incentives. Math Oper Res 7:617-628 · Zbl 0496.90008 · doi:10.1287/moor.7.4.617
[29] Roth AE (1982b) Incentive compatibility in a market with indivisibilities. Econ Lett 9:127-132 · Zbl 0722.90009 · doi:10.1016/0165-1765(82)90003-9
[30] Roth AE (2007) Repugnance as a constraint on markets. J Econ Perspect 21:37-58 · doi:10.1257/jep.21.3.37
[31] Roth AE, Peranson E (1999) The redesign of the matching market for American physicians: some engineering aspects of economic design. Am Econ Rev 89:748-780 · doi:10.1257/aer.89.4.748
[32] Roth AE, Postlewaite A (1977) Weak versus strong domination in a market with indivisible goods. J Math Econ 4:131-137 · Zbl 0368.90025 · doi:10.1016/0304-4068(77)90004-0
[33] Shapley LS, Scarf HE (1974) On cores and indivisibility. J Math Econ 1:23-37 · Zbl 0281.90014 · doi:10.1016/0304-4068(74)90033-0
[34] Shapley LS, Shubik M (1971) The assignment game I: the core. Int J Game Theory 1:111-130 · Zbl 0236.90078 · doi:10.1007/BF01753437
[35] Sönmez T (1996) Implementation in generalized matching problems. J Math Econ 26:429-439 · Zbl 0876.90012 · doi:10.1016/S0304-4068(96)00758-6
[36] Sönmez T (1999) Strategy-proofness and essentially single-valued cores. Econometrica 67:677-689 · Zbl 1021.91036 · doi:10.1111/1468-0262.00044
[37] Sotomayor M (2007) Connecting the cooperative and competitive structures of the multiple-partners assignment game. J Econ Theory 134:155-174 · Zbl 1157.91411 · doi:10.1016/j.jet.2006.02.005
[38] Tan JJM (1991) A necessary and sufficient condition for the existence of a complete stable matching. J Algorithms 12:154-178 · Zbl 0715.68069 · doi:10.1016/0196-6774(91)90028-W
[39] Voorneveld M, Norde H (1997) A characterization of ordinal potential games. Games Econ Behav 19:235-242 · Zbl 0882.90135 · doi:10.1006/game.1997.0554
[40] Wako J (1984) A note on the strong core of a market with indivisible goods. J Math Econ 13:189-194 · Zbl 0563.90013 · doi:10.1016/0304-4068(84)90017-X
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.