×

Group decision making based on multiplicative consistent reciprocal preference relations. (English) Zbl 1394.91106

Summary: The main aim of this paper is to investigate the consistency and consensus of multiplicative consistent reciprocal preference relations. Based on the multiplicative consistency property, a straightforward method to obtain the priority vector for multiplicative consistent reciprocal preference relation is introduced together with some of its desired properties. In addition, some interesting properties on consistency and consensus for reciprocal preference relations are further investigated. A consensus optimization model for group decision making with reciprocal preference relations is proposed, which enables the decision makers to reach consensus with the highest overall consensus level. Numerical examples are provided to make a discussion and comparison with some existing similar methods.

MSC:

91B06 Decision theory
91B08 Individual preferences
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Aguarón, J.; Moreno-Jiménez, J. M., The geometric consistency index: approximated thresholds, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 147, 137-145, (2003) · Zbl 1060.90657
[2] Barrenechea, E.; Fernandez, J.; Pagola, M.; Chiclana, F.; Bustince, H., Construction of interval-valued fuzzy preference relations from ignorance functions and fuzzy preference relations. application to decision making, Knowl.-Based Syst., 58, 33-44, (2014)
[3] Blin, J. M.; Whinston, A. B., Fuzzy sets and social choice, J. Cybern., 3, 28-36, (1973) · Zbl 0303.90009
[4] Cabrerizo, F. J.; Perez, I. J.; Herrera-Viedma, E., Managing the consensus in group decision making in an unbalanced fuzzy linguistic context with incomplete information, Knowl.-Based Syst., 23, 169-181, (2010)
[5] Cavallo, B.; D’Apuzzo, L., A general unified framework for pairwise comparison matrices in multicriterial methods, Int. J. Intell. Syst., 24, 377-398, (2009) · Zbl 1163.68336
[6] Cavallo, B.; D’Apuzzo, L., Reciprocal transitive matrices over abelian linearly ordered groups: characterizations and application to multi-criteria decision problems, Fuzzy Sets Syst., 266, 33-46, (2015) · Zbl 1361.91010
[7] Chiclana, F.; Mata, F.; Martínez, L.; Herrera-Viedma, E.; Alonso, S., Integration of a consistency control module within a consensus decision making model, Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl.-Based Syst., 16, 35-53, (2008)
[8] Chiclana, F.; Herrera-Viedma, E.; Herrera, F.; Alonso, S., Some induced ordered weighted averaging operators and their use for solving group decision-making problems based on fuzzy preference relations, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 182, 383-399, (2007) · Zbl 1128.90513
[9] Chiclana, F.; Herrera, F.; Herrera-Viedma, E.; Martinez, L., A note on the reciprocity in the aggregation of fuzzy preference relations using OWA operators, Fuzzy Sets Syst., 137, 71-83, (2003) · Zbl 1056.91016
[10] Chiclana, F.; Herrera, F.; Herrera-Viedma, E., Integrating multiplicative preference relations in a multipurpose decision-making model based on fuzzy preference relations, Fuzzy Sets Syst., 122, 277-291, (2001) · Zbl 1098.90523
[11] Chiclana, F.; Herrera-Viedma, E.; Alonso, S.; Herrera, F., Cardinal consistency of reciprocal preference relations: a characterization of multiplicative transitivity, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., 17, 14-23, (2009)
[12] Chiclana, F.; Tapia-Garcia, J. M.; del Moral, M. J.; Herrera-Viedma, E., A statistical comparative study of different similarity measures of consensus in group decision making, Inf. Sci., 221, 110-123, (February 2013)
[13] Crawford, G.; Williams, C., A note on the analysis of subjective judgement matrices, J. Math. Psychol., 29, 387-405, (1985) · Zbl 0585.62183
[14] Cutello, V.; Montero, J., Fuzzy rationality measures, Fuzzy Sets Syst., 62, 39-44, (1994) · Zbl 0828.90004
[15] De Baets, B.; De Meyer, H., Transitivity frameworks for reciprocal relations: cycle-transitivity versus FG-transitivity, Fuzzy Sets Syst., 152, 249-270, (2005) · Zbl 1114.91031
[16] De Baets, B.; De Meyer, H.; De Loof, K., On the cycle-transitivity of the mutual rank probability relation of a poset, Fuzzy Sets Syst., 161, 2695-2708, (2010) · Zbl 1256.06001
[17] Dong, Y. H.; Xu, Y. F.; Li, H. Y., On consistency measures of linguistic preference relations, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 189, 430-444, (2008) · Zbl 1149.90349
[18] Dong, Y. C.; Zhang, G. Q.; Hong, W. C.; Xu, Y. F., Consensus models for AHP group decision making under row geometric mean prioritization method, Decis. Support Syst., 49, 281-289, (2010)
[19] Entani, T.; Inuiguchi, M., Pairwise comparison based interval analysis for group decision aiding with multiple criteria, Fuzzy Sets Syst., 274, 79-96, (2015) · Zbl 1375.91052
[20] Ergu, D.; Kou, G.; Peng, Y.; Shi, Y., A simple method to improve the consistency ratio of the pair-wise comparison matrix in ANP, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 213, 246-259, (2011) · Zbl 1237.90220
[21] Fan, Z. P.; Ma, J.; Jiang, Y. P.; Sun, Y. H.; Ma, L., A goal programming approach to group decision making based on multiplicative preference relations and fuzzy preference relations, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 174, 311-321, (2006) · Zbl 1116.90365
[22] Fernandez, E.; Leyva, J. C., A method based on multiobjective optimization for deriving a ranking from a fuzzy preference relation, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 154, 110-124, (2004) · Zbl 1099.91506
[23] Herrera-Viedma, E.; Herrera, F.; Chiclana, F.; Luque, M., Some issues on consistency of fuzzy preference relations, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 154, 98-109, (2004) · Zbl 1099.91508
[24] Herrera-Viedma, E.; Herrera, F.; Chiclana, F.; Luque, M., A consensus model for multiperson decision making with different preference structures, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern., 34, 394-402, (2002)
[25] Ignjatović, J.; Ćirić, M.; Šešelja, B.; Tepavčević, A., Fuzzy relational inequalities and equations, fuzzy quasi-orders, closures and openings of fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Sets Syst., 260, 1-24, (2015) · Zbl 1335.03053
[26] Khalili-Damghani, K.; Sadi-Nezhad, S.; Tavana, M., Solving multi-period project selection problems with fuzzy goal programming based on TOPSIS and a fuzzy preference relation, Inf. Sci., 252, 42-61, (2013) · Zbl 1321.90159
[27] Kim, S. H.; Ahn, B. S., Interactive group decision making procedure under incomplete information, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 116, 498-507, (1999) · Zbl 1009.90519
[28] Lipovetsky, S.; Conklin, W. M., Robust estimation of priorities in the AHP, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 137, 110-122, (2002) · Zbl 1009.90059
[29] Liu, F.; Zhang, W. G.; Zhang, L. H., Consistency analysis of triangular fuzzy reciprocal preference relations, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 235, 718-726, (2014) · Zbl 1305.91095
[30] Mata, F.; Martínez, L.; Herrera-Viedma, E., An adaptive consensus support model for group decision-making problems in a multigranular fuzzy linguistic context, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., 17, 279-290, (2009)
[31] Mata, F.; Pérez, L. G.; Zhou, S. M.; Chiclana, F., Type-1 OWA methodology to consensus reaching processes in multi-granular linguistic contexts, Knowl.-Based Syst., 58, 11-22, (2014)
[32] Ma, J.; Fan, Z. P.; Jiang, Y. P.; Mao, J. Y.; Ma, L., A method for repairing the inconsistency of fuzzy preference relations, Fuzzy Sets Syst., 157, 20-33, (2006) · Zbl 1117.91330
[33] Millet, I.; Saaty, T. L., On the relativity of relative measures-accommodating both rank preservation and rank reversals in the AHP, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 121, 205-212, (2000) · Zbl 0948.91015
[34] Orlovsky, S. A., Decision-making with a fuzzy preference relation, Fuzzy Sets Syst., 1, 155-167, (1978) · Zbl 0396.90004
[35] Palomares, I.; Rodríguez, R. M.; Martínez, L., An attitude-driven web consensus support system for heterogeneous group decision making, Expert Syst. Appl., 40, 139-149, (2013)
[36] Park, K. S.; Kim, S. H., Tools for interactive multi-attribute decision making with incompletely identified information, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 98, 111-123, (1997) · Zbl 0920.90085
[37] Saaty, T. L.; Sagir, M., An essay on rank preservation and reversal, Math. Comput. Model., 49, 1230-1243, (2009) · Zbl 1165.91351
[38] Siraj, S.; Mikhailov, L.; Keane, J., A heuristic method to rectify intransitive judgments in pairwise comparison matrices, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 216, 420-428, (2012) · Zbl 1237.90121
[39] Tanino, T., Fuzzy preference orderings in group decision-making, Fuzzy Sets Syst., 12, 117-131, (1984) · Zbl 0567.90002
[40] Tomashevskii, I. L., Eigenvector ranking method as a measuring tool: formulas for errors, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 240, 774-780, (2015) · Zbl 1338.91062
[41] Świtalski, Z., Transitivity of fuzzy preference relations-an empirical study, Fuzzy Sets Syst., 118, 503-508, (2001)
[42] Wang, Y. M.; Fan, Z. P., Group decision analysis based on fuzzy preference relations: logarithmic and geometric least squares methods, Appl. Math. Comput., 194, 108-119, (2007) · Zbl 1193.91045
[43] Wu, J.; Chiclana, F., Multiplicative consistency of intuitionistic reciprocal preference relations and its application to missing values estimation and consensus building, Knowl.-Based Syst., 71, 187-200, (2014)
[44] Wu, J.; Chiclana, F., Visual information feedback mechanism and attitudinal prioritisation method for group decision making with triangular fuzzy complementary preference relations, Inf. Sci., 279, 716-734, (2014) · Zbl 1354.91051
[45] Wu, J.; Chiclana, F., A social network analysis trust-consensus based approach to group decision-making problems with interval-valued fuzzy reciprocal preference relations, Knowl.-Based Syst., 59, 97-107, (2014)
[46] Wu, Z. B.; Xu, J. P., A consistency and consensus based decision support model for group decision making with multiplicative preference relations, Decis. Support Syst., 52, 757-767, (2012)
[47] Xia, M. M.; Xu, Z. S., On consensus in group decision making based on fuzzy preference relations, (Herrera-Viedma, E.; García-Lapresta, J. L.; Kacprzyk, J.; Nurmi, H.; Fedrizzi, M.; Zadrozny, S., Consensual Processes, (2010), Springer-Verlag)
[48] Xia, M. M.; Xu, Z. S.; Chen, J., Algorithms for improving consistency or consensus of reciprocal [\(0, 1\)]-valued preference relations, Fuzzy Sets Syst., 216, 108-133, (2013) · Zbl 1291.91061
[49] Xia, M. M.; Chen, J., Consistency and consensus improving methods for pairwise comparison matrices based on abelian linearly ordered group, Fuzzy Sets Syst., 266, 1-32, (2015) · Zbl 1361.91031
[50] Xu, Y. J.; Li, K. W.; Wang, H. M., Distance-based consensus models for fuzzy and multiplicative preference relations, Inf. Sci., 253, 56-73, (2013) · Zbl 1321.91031
[51] Xu, Y. J.; Patnayakuni, R.; Wang, H., Logarithmic least squares method to priority for group decision making within complete fuzzy preference relations, Appl. Math. Model., 37, 2139-2152, (2013) · Zbl 1349.90519
[52] Xu, Z. S., Goal programming models for obtaining the priority vector of incomplete fuzzy preference relation, Int. J. Approx. Reason., 36, 261-270, (2004) · Zbl 1088.91015
[53] Xu, Z. S., A consensus reaching process under incomplete multiplicative preference relations, Int. J. Gen. Syst., 41, 333-351, (2012) · Zbl 1278.90204
[54] Xu, Z. S.; Da, Q. L., A possibility based method for priorities of interval judgment matrices, Chinese Journal of Management Science, 11, 63-65, (2003)
[55] Xu, Z. S.; Da, Q. L., A least deviation method to obtain a priority vector of a fuzzy preference relation, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 164, 206-216, (2005) · Zbl 1132.90342
[56] Xu, Z. S.; Wei, C. P., A consistency improving method in the analytic hierarchy process, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 116, 443-449, (1999) · Zbl 1009.90513
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.