×

Active vibration control of large space flexible slewing truss using cable actuator with input saturation. (English) Zbl 1390.93398

Summary: This paper proposes a composite approach to implementing attitude tracking and active vibration control of a large space flexible truss system. The system dynamic model is based on Hamilton’s principle and discretized using the finite difference method. A nonlinear attitude controller for position tracking is developed based on the input-output linearization of the discretized system, which can effectively improve system performance compared with a traditional proportional-differential feedback controller. A taut cable actuator scheme is presented to suppress tip vibration because the mechanical model is a large large-span spatial structure; furthermore, because the cable has the feature of unilateral input saturation constraint, which can provide only a pulling force, a nonlinear quadratic regulator controller is developed by introducing a piecewise nonquadratic cost function to suppress the vibration of the flexible structure. To investigate the factors that influence the damping effects of the cable, the parametrically excited instability of a cable under 2 supports is analyzed. Simulation results illustrate that the proposed attitude controller can implement the task of position tracking, and the vibration suppression control law is shown to be optimal for functional performance with input saturation.

MSC:

93C20 Control/observation systems governed by partial differential equations
93B40 Computational methods in systems theory (MSC2010)
74H45 Vibrations in dynamical problems in solid mechanics
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] PreumountA, AchkireY, BossensF. Active tendon control of large trusses. AIAA JOURNAL. 2000;38(3):493‐498.
[2] JohnsonEA, ChristensonRE, SpencerBF. Semi‐active damping of cables with sag. Computer‐Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering. March 2003.
[3] PakosW. Analysis of harmonic vibration of cable‐stayed footbridge under the influence of changes of the cables tension. Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica. 2015;37:3
[4] GuoT, LuQ, LiJ. PI force feedback control for large flexible structure vibration. Acta Mech. 2008;24:721‐725. · Zbl 1257.74108
[5] BakuleP‐C. Rodellar: Overlapping reliable control for a cable‐stayed bridge benchmark. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol. 2005;13(4):663‐669.
[6] NatoriMC, TakanoT, OhnishiA, MiyoshiK, InoueT, TabataM, KondoK. In‐orbit deployment of a high precision mesh antenna system for space VLBI missions, AIAA Paper 98-1837, April 1998.
[7] SasakiS, TanakaK, HiguchiK, et al. Cabled solar power satellite. JAXA Research and Development Report, ISSN 1349-113, JAXA RR‐03‐0005E, 2004.
[8] SendaK, KanafukiM, OkuizumiN. Dynamics analysis of a solar power satellite. Proceedings of the 18th ISAS Symposium on Space Structures and Materials, 2002.
[9] TienengG. An improved force feedback control algorithm for active tendons, Sensors. Sensors. 2012;12(8):11360‐11371.
[10] BakuleL, Paulet‐CrainiceanuF, RodellarJ, RossellJM. Overlapping reliable control for a cable‐stayed bridge benchmark. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol.2005;13(4):663‐669.
[11] BakuleL. Reliable control of large scale flexible structures. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, Vol. 40 (9):67‐72, 2007.
[12] SchemmannAG, SmithHA. Vibration control of cable‐stayed bridges‐part 2: control analyses. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn. 1998;27(8):825‐843.
[13] MurotsuY, OkuboH, TeruiF. Low‐authority control of large space structures by using a tendon control system. J Guid Control Dynam. 2015;12(2):264‐272.
[14] LuJ, ThorpJS. Optimal tendon configuration of a tendon control system for a flexible structure. J Guid Control Dynam. 1994;17(1):161‐169.
[15] De JaqerB, SkeltonR. Input-output selection for planar tensegrity models. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol.2005;13(5):778‐785.
[16] Lopez‐AlmansaF, RodellarJ. Feasibility and robustness of predictive control of building structures by active cables. Earth‐quake Eng Struct Dyn. 1990;19(3):157‐171.
[17] FernandoV, AlvarezJ. Hopf bifurcation control: a new approach. Syst Control Lett. 2006;55:437‐445. · Zbl 1129.93417
[18] LiuZR, ChungKW. Hybrid control of bifurcation in continuous nonlinear dynamical systems coupled chaotic systems. Int J Bifurcation Chaos. 2005;15(12):3895‐3903. · Zbl 1093.93545
[19] deOliveiraMLB. Analysis of a high‐order finite difference detector for discontinuities. INT J COMPUT MATH. 2017;94(4):676‐689. · Zbl 1364.76144
[20] GuoBZ, YangDH. Optimal actuator location for time and norm optimal control of null controllable heat equation. Math Control Signals Syst. 2015;27(1):23‐48. · Zbl 1311.49109
[21] KhalilHK. Nonlinear Systems. New York: Macmillan; 1992. · Zbl 0969.34001
[22] ZhangLT. Study of control simulations of a flexible manipulator system. Master dissertation. Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, P.R. China, 2002.
[23] DennisS. Bernstein, optimal nonlinear, but continuous, feedback control of systems with saturating actuators. INT J CONTROL. 1995;62(5):1209‐1216. · Zbl 0843.93025
[24] IrvineHM. Cable Structures. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1981.
[25] NayfehAH, MookDT. Nonlinear oscillations. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1979. · Zbl 0418.70001
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.