×

Does boundary quantum mechanics imply quantum mechanics in the bulk? (English) Zbl 1388.81675

Summary: Perturbative bulk reconstruction in AdS/CFT starts by representing a free bulk field \(\phi^{(0)}\) as a smeared operator in the CFT. A series of \(1/N\) corrections must be added to \(\phi^{(0)}\) to represent an interacting bulk field \(\phi\). These corrections have been determined in the literature from several points of view. Here we develop a new perspective. We show that correlation functions involving \(\phi^{(0)}\) suffer from ambiguities due to analytic continuation. As a result \(\phi^{(0)}\) fails to be a well-defined linear operator in the CFT. This means bulk reconstruction can be understood as a procedure for building up well-defined operators in the CFT which thereby singles out the interacting field \(\phi\). We further propose that the difficulty with defining \(\phi^{(0)}\) as a linear operator can be re-interpreted as a breakdown of associativity. Presumably \(\phi^{(0)}\) can only be corrected to become an associative operator in perturbation theory. This suggests that quantum mechanics in the bulk is only valid in perturbation theory around a semiclassical bulk geometry.

MSC:

81T40 Two-dimensional field theories, conformal field theories, etc. in quantum mechanics
83C45 Quantization of the gravitational field
81S10 Geometry and quantization, symplectic methods

References:

[1] J.M. Maldacena, The large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity, Int. J. Theor. Phys.38 (1999) 1113 [hep-th/9711200] [INSPIRE]. · Zbl 0969.81047 · doi:10.1023/A:1026654312961
[2] D. Kabat, G. Lifschytz and D.A. Lowe, Constructing local bulk observables in interacting AdS/CFT, Phys. Rev.D 83 (2011) 106009 [arXiv:1102.2910] [INSPIRE].
[3] T. Banks, M.R. Douglas, G.T. Horowitz and E.J. Martinec, AdS dynamics from conformal field theory, hep-th/9808016 [INSPIRE]. · Zbl 1390.83135
[4] V.K. Dobrev, Intertwining operator realization of the AdS/CFT correspondence, Nucl. Phys.B 553 (1999) 559 [hep-th/9812194] [INSPIRE]. · Zbl 0958.81122 · doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(99)00284-9
[5] I. Bena, On the construction of local fields in the bulk of AdS5and other spaces, Phys. Rev.D 62 (2000) 066007 [hep-th/9905186] [INSPIRE].
[6] A. Hamilton, D.N. Kabat, G. Lifschytz and D.A. Lowe, Local bulk operators in AdS/CFT: A Boundary view of horizons and locality, Phys. Rev.D 73 (2006) 086003 [hep-th/0506118] [INSPIRE].
[7] A. Hamilton, D.N. Kabat, G. Lifschytz and D.A. Lowe, Holographic representation of local bulk operators, Phys. Rev.D 74 (2006) 066009 [hep-th/0606141] [INSPIRE].
[8] A. Hamilton, D.N. Kabat, G. Lifschytz and D.A. Lowe, Local bulk operators in AdS/CFT: A Holographic description of the black hole interior, Phys. Rev.D 75 (2007) 106001 [Erratum ibid.D 75 (2007) 129902] [hep-th/0612053] [INSPIRE]. · Zbl 1165.81352
[9] H. Verlinde, Poking Holes in AdS/CFT: Bulk Fields from Boundary States, arXiv:1505.05069 [INSPIRE]. · Zbl 1387.81297
[10] M. Miyaji, T. Numasawa, N. Shiba, T. Takayanagi and K. Watanabe, Continuous Multiscale Entanglement Renormalization Ansatz as Holographic Surface-State Correspondence, Phys. Rev. Lett.115 (2015) 171602 [arXiv:1506.01353] [INSPIRE]. · doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.171602
[11] Y. Nakayama and H. Ooguri, Bulk Locality and Boundary Creating Operators, JHEP10 (2015) 114 [arXiv:1507.04130] [INSPIRE]. · Zbl 1388.83308 · doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2015)114
[12] D. Kabat and G. Lifschytz, Local bulk physics from intersecting modular Hamiltonians, JHEP06 (2017) 120 [arXiv:1703.06523] [INSPIRE]. · Zbl 1380.81333 · doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2017)120
[13] T. Faulkner and A. Lewkowycz, Bulk locality from modular flow, JHEP07 (2017) 151 [arXiv:1704.05464] [INSPIRE]. · Zbl 1380.81313 · doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2017)151
[14] J. Cotler, P. Hayden, G. Salton, B. Swingle and M. Walter, Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction via Universal Recovery Channels, arXiv:1704.05839 [INSPIRE].
[15] D. Kabat and G. Lifschytz, Bulk equations of motion from CFT correlators, JHEP09 (2015) 059 [arXiv:1505.03755] [INSPIRE]. · Zbl 1388.83274 · doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2015)059
[16] I. Heemskerk, D. Marolf, J. Polchinski and J. Sully, Bulk and Transhorizon Measurements in AdS/CFT, JHEP10 (2012) 165 [arXiv:1201.3664] [INSPIRE]. · doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2012)165
[17] A. Lewkowycz, G.J. Turiaci and H. Verlinde, A CFT Perspective on Gravitational Dressing and Bulk Locality, JHEP01 (2017) 004 [arXiv:1608.08977] [INSPIRE]. · Zbl 1373.81333 · doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2017)004
[18] M. Guica, Bulk fields from the boundary OPE, arXiv:1610.08952 [INSPIRE].
[19] N. Anand, H. Chen, A.L. Fitzpatrick, J. Kaplan and D. Li, An Exact Operator That Knows Its Location, JHEP02 (2018) 012 [arXiv:1708.04246] [INSPIRE]. · Zbl 1387.81297 · doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2018)012
[20] H. Chen, A.L. Fitzpatrick, J. Kaplan and D. Li, The AdS3Propagator and the Fate of Locality, arXiv:1712.02351 [INSPIRE]. · Zbl 1390.81497
[21] D. Kabat and G. Lifschytz, CFT representation of interacting bulk gauge fields in AdS, Phys. Rev.D 87 (2013) 086004 [arXiv:1212.3788] [INSPIRE].
[22] D. Kabat and G. Lifschytz, Decoding the hologram: Scalar fields interacting with gravity, Phys. Rev.D 89 (2014) 066010 [arXiv:1311.3020] [INSPIRE].
[23] I. Heemskerk, Construction of Bulk Fields with Gauge Redundancy, JHEP09 (2012) 106 [arXiv:1201.3666] [INSPIRE]. · doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2012)106
[24] D. Kabat, G. Lifschytz, S. Roy and D. Sarkar, Holographic representation of bulk fields with spin in AdS/CFT, Phys. Rev.D 86 (2012) 026004 [arXiv:1204.0126] [INSPIRE].
[25] D. Sarkar and X. Xiao, Holographic Representation of Higher Spin Gauge Fields, Phys. Rev.D 91 (2015) 086004 [arXiv:1411.4657] [INSPIRE].
[26] A. Almheiri, X. Dong and D. Harlow, Bulk Locality and Quantum Error Correction in AdS/CFT, JHEP04 (2015) 163 [arXiv:1411.7041] [INSPIRE]. · Zbl 1388.81095 · doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2015)163
[27] E. Mintun, J. Polchinski and V. Rosenhaus, Bulk-Boundary Duality, Gauge Invariance and Quantum Error Corrections, Phys. Rev. Lett.115 (2015) 151601 [arXiv:1501.06577] [INSPIRE]. · doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.151601
[28] S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT, Phys. Rev. Lett.96 (2006) 181602 [hep-th/0603001] [INSPIRE]. · Zbl 1228.83110 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.181602
[29] E. Hijano, P. Kraus, E. Perlmutter and R. Snively, Witten Diagrams Revisited: The AdS Geometry of Conformal Blocks, JHEP01 (2016) 146 [arXiv:1508.00501] [INSPIRE]. · Zbl 1388.81047 · doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2016)146
[30] B. Czech, L. Lamprou, S. McCandlish, B. Mosk and J. Sully, A Stereoscopic Look into the Bulk, JHEP07 (2016) 129 [arXiv:1604.03110] [INSPIRE]. · Zbl 1390.83101 · doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2016)129
[31] B. Carneiro da Cunha and M. Guica, Exploring the BTZ bulk with boundary conformal blocks, arXiv:1604.07383 [INSPIRE].
[32] J. de Boer, F.M. Haehl, M.P. Heller and R.C. Myers, Entanglement, holography and causal diamonds, JHEP08 (2016) 162 [arXiv:1606.03307] [INSPIRE]. · Zbl 1390.83135 · doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2016)162
[33] D. Kabat and G. Lifschytz, Locality, bulk equations of motion and the conformal bootstrap, JHEP10 (2016) 091 [arXiv:1603.06800] [INSPIRE]. · Zbl 1390.81521 · doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2016)091
[34] A. Almheiri, D. Marolf, J. Polchinski and J. Sully, Black Holes: Complementarity or Firewalls?, JHEP02 (2013) 062 [arXiv:1207.3123] [INSPIRE]. · Zbl 1342.83121 · doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2013)062
[35] A. Almheiri, D. Marolf, J. Polchinski, D. Stanford and J. Sully, An Apologia for Firewalls, JHEP09 (2013) 018 [arXiv:1304.6483] [INSPIRE]. · doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2013)018
[36] K. Papadodimas and S. Raju, An Infalling Observer in AdS/CFT, JHEP10 (2013) 212 [arXiv:1211.6767] [INSPIRE]. · doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2013)212
[37] K. Papadodimas and S. Raju, State-Dependent Bulk-Boundary Maps and Black Hole Complementarity, Phys. Rev.D 89 (2014) 086010 [arXiv:1310.6335] [INSPIRE].
[38] K. Papadodimas and S. Raju, Remarks on the necessity and implications of state-dependence in the black hole interior, Phys. Rev.D 93 (2016) 084049 [arXiv:1503.08825] [INSPIRE].
[39] D. Berenstein and A. Miller, Can Topology and Geometry be Measured by an Operator Measurement in Quantum Gravity?, Phys. Rev. Lett.118 (2017) 261601 [arXiv:1605.06166] [INSPIRE]. · doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.261601
[40] D.L. Jafferis, Bulk reconstruction and the Hartle-Hawking wavefunction, arXiv:1703.01519 [INSPIRE].
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.