×

Null angular momentum and weak KAM solutions of the Newtonian \(N\)-body problem. (English) Zbl 1383.37050

This paper presents an extension of the result given by B. Percino and H. Sánchez-Morgado [Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 213, No. 3, 981–991 (2014; Zbl 1342.70031)], where it was shown that the Busemann function of the parabolic homothetic motion for a minimal central configuration of the \(N\)-body problem is a viscosity solution of the Hamilton-Jacobi equation.
The author takes the same hypotheses by the aforementioned article and uses weak KAM solutions of the Hamiltonian-Jacobi equations [G. Contreras, Calc. Var. Partial Differ. Equ. 13, No. 4, 427–458 (2001; Zbl 0993.37030)] to prove the existence of completely parabolic motions. The key mechanism is to give conditions so that a weak KAM solution is rotational invariant. The result is achieved by studying the angular momentum for the calibrating curves of rotational invariant solutions and characterizing invariant solutions as those where calibrating curves have zero angular momentum.

MSC:

37J40 Perturbations of finite-dimensional Hamiltonian systems, normal forms, small divisors, KAM theory, Arnol’d diffusion
37N05 Dynamical systems in classical and celestial mechanics
37J15 Symmetries, invariants, invariant manifolds, momentum maps, reduction (MSC2010)
37J50 Action-minimizing orbits and measures (MSC2010)
70F10 \(n\)-body problems
70H20 Hamilton-Jacobi equations in mechanics

References:

[1] Abraham, Ralph and Marsden, Jerrold E. and Ra\c{t}iu, Tudor S., Manifolds, tensor analysis, and applications, Global Analysis Pure and Applied: Series B, 2, xix+582, (1983), Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Reading, Mass. · Zbl 0508.58001
[2] Dynamical systems. {VIII}, Encyclopaedia of Mathematical Sciences, 39, iv+235, (1993), Springer-Verlag, Berlin · Zbl 0778.58001 · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-06798-7
[3] Chenciner, A., Action minimizing solutions of the {N}ewtonian {\(n\)}-body problem: from homology to symmetry, Proceedings of the {I}nternational {C}ongress of {M}athematicians, {V}ol. {III} ({B}eijing, 2002), 279-294, (2002), Higher Ed. Press, Beijing · Zbl 1136.70310
[4] Contreras, G., Action potential and weak {KAM} solutions, Calculus of Variations and Partial Differential Equations, 13, 4, 427-458, (2001) · Zbl 0993.37030 · doi:10.1007/s005260100081
[5] da Luz, Adriana and Maderna, Ezequiel, On the free time minimizers of the {N}ewtonian {\(N\)}-body problem, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 156, 2, 209-227, (2014) · Zbl 1331.70035 · doi:10.1017/S0305004113000650
[6] Ferrario, Davide L. and Terracini, Susanna, On the existence of collisionless equivariant minimizers for the classical {\(n\)}-body problem, Inventiones Mathematicae, 155, 2, 305-362, (2004) · Zbl 1068.70013 · doi:10.1007/s00222-003-0322-7
[7] Maderna, Ezequiel, On weak {KAM} theory for {\(N\)}-body problems, Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems, 32, 3, 1019-1041, (2012) · Zbl 1257.37039 · doi:10.1017/S0143385711000046
[8] Maderna, Ezequiel, Translation invariance of weak {KAM} solutions of the {N}ewtonian {\(N\)}-body problem, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 141, 8, 2809-2816, (2013) · Zbl 1383.37041 · doi:10.1090/S0002-9939-2013-11542-X
[9] Marchal, C., How the method of minimization of action avoids singularities, Celestial Mechanics & Dynamical Astronomy. An International Journal of Space Dynamics, 83, 1-4, 325-353, (2002) · Zbl 1073.70011 · doi:10.1023/A:1020128408706
[10] Meyer, Kenneth R. and Offin, Daniel C., Introduction to {H}amiltonian dynamical systems and the {\(N\)}-body problem, Applied Mathematical Sciences, 90, xiii + 384, (2017), Springer, Cham · Zbl 1372.70002 · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-53691-0
[11] Percino, Boris and S\'anchez-Morgado, H\'ector, Busemann functions for the {\(N\)}-body problem, Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 213, 3, 981-991, (2014) · Zbl 1342.70031 · doi:10.1007/s00205-014-0748-7
[12] Saari, Donald G., Symmetry in {\(n\)}-particle systems, Hamiltonian Dynamical Systems ({B}oulder, {CO}, 1987), Contemp. Math., 81, 23-42, (1988), Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI · Zbl 0668.70011 · doi:10.1090/conm/081/986255
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.