×

Joint reconstruction via coupled Bregman iterations with applications to PET-MR imaging. (English) Zbl 1381.92057

Summary: Joint reconstruction has recently attracted a lot of attention, especially in the field of medical multi-modality imaging such as PET-MRI. Most of the developed methods rely on the comparison of image gradients, or more precisely their location, direction and magnitude, to make use of structural similarities between the images. A challenge and still an open issue for most of the methods is to handle images in entirely different scales, i.e. different magnitudes of gradients that cannot be dealt with by a global scaling of the data. We propose the use of generalized Bregman distances and infimal convolutions thereof with regard to the well-known total variation functional. The use of a total variation subgradient respectively the involved vector field rather than an image gradient naturally excludes the magnitudes of gradients, which in particular solves the scaling behavior. Additionally, the presented method features a weighting that allows to control the amount of interaction between channels. We give insights into the general behavior of the method, before we further tailor it to a particular application, namely PET-MRI joint reconstruction. To do so, we compute joint reconstruction results from blurry Poisson data for PET and undersampled Fourier data from MRI and show that we can gain a mutual benefit for both modalities. In particular, the results are superior to the respective separate reconstructions and other joint reconstruction methods.

MSC:

92C55 Biomedical imaging and signal processing
65R10 Numerical methods for integral transforms
94A08 Image processing (compression, reconstruction, etc.) in information and communication theory

Software:

SPIRAL; BrainWeb

References:

[1] Ambrosio L, Fusco N and Pallara D 2000 {\it Functions of Bounded Variation and Free Discontinuity Problems}{\it (Oxford Mathematical Monographs)} (New York: Clarendon) · Zbl 0957.49001
[2] Atre A, Vunckx K, Baete K, Reilhac A and Nuyts J 2009 Evaluation of different MRI-based anatomical priors for PET brain imaging {\it IEEE Nuclear Science Symp. Conf. Record}{\it (NSS/MIC,)} pp 2774-80
[3] Bauschke H H and Combettes P L 2011 {\it Convex Analysis and Monotone Operator Theory in Hilbert Spaces} 1st edn (New York: Springer) · Zbl 1218.47001
[4] Bonettini S and Ruggiero V 2011 An alternating extragradient method for total variation-based image restoration from poisson data {\it Inverse Problems}27 095001 · Zbl 1252.94008
[5] Bowsher J E, Johnson V E, Turkington T G, Jaszczak R J, Floyd C E and Coleman R E 1996 Bayesian reconstruction and use of anatomical a priori information for emission tomography {\it IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging}15 673-86
[6] Bredies K, Kunisch K and Pock T 2010 Total generalized variation {\it SIAM J. Imaging Sci.}3 492-526 · Zbl 1195.49025
[7] Bredies K and Pikkarainen H K 2013 Inverse problems in space of measures {\it SIAM: Control, Optimisation Calculus Variations}19 190-218 · Zbl 1266.65083
[8] Brinkmann E M, Burger M, Rasch J and Sutour C 2017 Bias-reduction in variational regularization {\it J. Math. Imaging Vis.}59 534-66 · Zbl 1385.49002
[9] Brown M and Semelka R 2011 {\it MRI: Basic Principles and Applications} (New York: Wiley)
[10] Burger M 2016 {\it Advances in Mathematical Modeling, Optimization and Optimal Control} (Cham: Springer) pp 3-33
[11] Candès E J, Romberg J and Tao T 2006 Robust uncertainty principles: exact signal reconstruction from highly incomplete frequency information {\it IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory}52 489-509 · Zbl 1231.94017
[12] Candès E J, Romberg J and Tao T 2006 Stable signal recovery from incomplete and inaccurate measurements {\it Commun. Pure Appl. Math.}59 1207-23 · Zbl 1098.94009
[13] Chambolle A and Pock T 2011 A first-order primal-dual algorithm for convex problems with applications to imaging {\it J. Math. Imaging Vis.}40 120-45 · Zbl 1255.68217
[14] Chan C, Fulton R, Feng D D and Meikle S 2009 Regularized image reconstruction with an anatomically adaptive prior for positron emission tomography {\it Phys. Med. Biol.}54 7379
[15] Cocosco C A, Kollokian V, Kwan R K S, Pike G B and Evans A C 1997 Brainweb: online interface to a 3D MRI simulated brain database {\it NeuroImage}5 425
[16] Dawood M, Jiang X and Schäfers K 2012 {\it Correction Techniques in Emission Tomography} (Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press)
[17] Delso G, Fürst S, Jakoby B, Ladebeck R, Ganter C, Nekolla S G, Schwaiger M and Ziegler S I 2011 Performance measurements of the Siemens mMR integrated whole-body PET/MR scanner {\it J. Nucl. Med.}52 1914-22
[18] Donoho D L 2006 Compressed sensing {\it IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory}52 1289-306 · Zbl 1288.94016
[19] Ehrhardt M and Arridge S 2014 Vector-valued image processing by parallel level sets {\it IEEE Trans. Image Process.}23 9-18 · Zbl 1374.94094
[20] Ehrhardt M and Betcke M 2016 Multicontrast MRI reconstruction with structure-guided total variation {\it SIAM J. Imaging Sci.}9 1084-106 · Zbl 1346.47006
[21] Ehrhardt M, Thielemans K, Pizarro L, Atkinson D, Ourselin S, Hutton B and Arridge S 2015 Joint reconstruction of PET-MRI by exploiting structural similarity {\it Inverse Problems}31 015001 · Zbl 1320.92057
[22] Ekeland I and Témam R 1999 Convex analysis and variational problems {\it Classics in Applied Mathematics} vol 1 (Philadelphia: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics) · Zbl 0939.49002
[23] Esser E, Zhang X and Chan T F 2010 A general framework for a class of first order primal-dual algorithms for convex optimization in imaging science {\it SIAM J. Imaging Sci.}3 1015-46 · Zbl 1206.90117
[24] Gallardo L A 2007 Multiple cross-gradient joint inversion for geospectral imaging {\it Geophys. Res. Lett.}34 L19301
[25] Gallardo L A and Meju M A 2003 Characterization of heterogeneous near-surface materials by joint 2D inversion of dc resistivity and seismic data {\it Geophys. Res. Lett.}30 1658
[26] Gallardo L A and Meju M A 2004 Joint two-dimensional DC resistivity and seismic travel time inversion with cross-gradients constraints {\it J. Geophys. Res.: Solid Earth}109 B03311
[27] Gallardo L A and Meju M A 2011 Structure-coupled multiphysics imaging in geophysical sciences {\it Rev. Geophys.}49 RG1003
[28] Haber E and Holtzman Gazit M 2013 Model fusion and joint inversion {\it Surv. Geophys.}34 675-95
[29] Haber E and Oldenburg D 1997 Joint inversion: a structural approach {\it Inverse Problems}13 63 · Zbl 0878.65047
[30] Harmany Z T, Marcia R F and Willett R M 2012 This is spiral-tap: sparse poisson intensity reconstruction algorithms—theory and practice {\it IEEE Trans. Image Process.}21 1084-96 · Zbl 1372.94381
[31] Kaipio J P, Kolehmainen V, Vauhkonen M and Somersalo E 1999 Inverse problems with structural prior information {\it Inverse Problems}15 713 · Zbl 0949.65144
[32] Kaplan S 1957 On the second dual of the space of continuous functions {\it Trans. Am. Math. Soc.}86 70-90 · Zbl 0081.10903
[33] Knoll F, Holler M, Koesters T, Otazo R, Bredies K and Sodickson D K 2017 Joint MR-PET reconstruction using a multi-channel image regularizer {\it IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging}36 1-16
[34] Kösters T, Schäfers K P and Wübbeling F 2012 EMrecon: an expectation maximization based image reconstruction framework for emission tomography data {\it IEEE NSS/MIC Conf. Record} pp 4365-8
[35] Leahy R and Yan X 1991 {\it Information Processing in Medical Imaging: 12th Int. Conf.}{\it (IPMI ’91 Wye, UK, 7-12 July 1991)} (Berlin: Springer) pp 105-20 · Zbl 0875.00132
[36] Liang Z P and Lauterbur P C 2000 {\it Principles of Magnetic Resonance Imaging: a Signal Processing Perspective}{\it (IEEE Press Series in Biomedical Engineering)} (Bellingham, WA: SPIE Optical Engineering Press)
[37] Lipinksi B, Herzog H, Kops E, Oberschelp W and Müller-Gärtner H 1997 Expectation maximization reconstruction of positron emission tomography images using anatomical magnetic resonance information {\it IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging}16 129-36
[38] Lustig M 2007 Sparse MRI: the application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging {\it Magn. Reson. Med.}58 1182-95
[39] Moeller M, Brinkmann E, Burger M and Seybold T 2014 Color Bregman TV {\it SIAM J. Imaging Sci.}7 2771-806 · Zbl 1361.94017
[40] Natterer F and Wübbeling F 2001 {\it Mathematical Methods in Image Reconstruction} (Philadelphia, PA: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics) · Zbl 0974.92016
[41] Nuyts J 2007 The use of mutual information and joint entropy for anatomical priors in emission tomography {\it IEEE Nuclear Science Symp. Conf. Record} pp 4149-54
[42] Osher S, Burger M, Goldfarb D, Xu J and Yin W 2005 An iterative regularization method for total variation-based image restoration {\it SIAM J. Multiscale Model. Simul.}4 460-89 · Zbl 1090.94003
[43] Pock T and Chambolle A 2011 Diagonal preconditioning for first-order primal-dual algorithms in convex optimization. {\it Proc. of the 2011 Int. Conf. on Computer Vision}{\it (Washington, DC, USA,)} pp 1762-9
[44] Pock T, Cremers D, Bischof H and Chambolle A 2009 An algorithm for minimizing the Mumford-Shah functional {\it IEEE 12th Int. Conf. on Computer Vision} pp 1133-40
[45] Rudin L I, Osher S and Fatemi E 1992 Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms {\it J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.}60 259-68 · Zbl 0780.49028
[46] Sawatzky A 2011 (Nonlocal) total variation in medical imaging {\it PhD Thesis} University of Münster · Zbl 1304.92032
[47] Sawatzky A, Brune C, Koesters T, Wbbeling F and Burger M 2013 {\it Level Set and PDE Based Reconstruction Methods in Imaging}{\it (Lecture Notes in Mathematics vol 2090)} (New York: Springer) pp 1-70
[48] Shepp L A and Vardi Y 1982 Maximum likelihood reconstruction for emission tomography {\it IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging}1 113-22
[49] Siemens-Aktiengesellschaft and Hendrix A 2003 {\it Magnets, Spins, and Resonances: an Introduction to the Basics of Magnetic Resonance}
[50] Vunckx K, Atre A, Baete K, Reilhac A, Deroose C, Laere K V and Nuyts J 2012 Evaluation of three MRI-based anatomical priors for quantitative PET brain imaging {\it IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging}31 599-612
[51] Wang Z, Bovik A C, Sheikh H R and Simoncelli E P 2004 Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity {\it IEEE Trans. Image Process.}13 600-12
[52] Wernick M and Aarsvold J 2004 {\it Emission Tomography: the Fundamentals of PET and SPECT} (Amsterdam: Elsevier)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.