×

The effects of leverage requirements and fire sales on financial contagion via asset liquidation strategies in financial networks. (English) Zbl 1378.91134

Summary: This paper provides a framework for modeling the financial system with multiple illiquid assets when liquidation of illiquid assets is caused by failure to meet a leverage requirement. This extends the network model of [6] which incorporates a single asset with fire sales and capital adequacy ratio. This also extends the network model of [14] which incorporates multiple illiquid assets with fire sales and no leverage ratios. We prove existence of equilibrium clearing payments and liquidation prices for a known liquidation strategy when leverage requirements are required. We also prove sufficient conditions for the existence of an equilibrium liquidation strategy with corresponding clearing payments and liquidation prices. Finally, we calibrate network models to asset and liability data for 50 banks in the United States from 2007–2014 in order to draw conclusions on systemic risk as a function of leverage requirements.

MSC:

91G99 Actuarial science and mathematical finance
90B10 Deterministic network models in operations research

References:

[1] H. Amini, D. Filipović and A. Minca, Systemic risk and central clearing counterparty design, Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper No. 13-34, Swiss Finance Institute, 2015.; Amini, H.; Filipović, D.; Minca, A., Systemic risk and central clearing counterparty design (2015) · Zbl 1443.91315
[2] H. Amini, D. Filipović and A. Minca, Uniqueness of equilibrium in a payment system with liquidation costs, Oper. Res. Lett. 44 (2016), no. 1, 1-5.; Amini, H.; Filipović, D.; Minca, A., Uniqueness of equilibrium in a payment system with liquidation costs, Oper. Res. Lett., 44, 1, 1-5 (2016) · Zbl 1408.91244
[3] K. Awiszus and S. Weber, The joint impact of bankruptcy costs, cross-holdings and fire sales on systemic risk in financial networks, Working paper (2015).; Awiszus, K.; Weber, S., The joint impact of bankruptcy costs, cross-holdings and fire sales on systemic risk in financial networks (2015)
[4] F. Caccioli, M. Shrestha, C. Moore and J. D. Farmer, Stability analysis of financial contagion due to overlapping portfolios, J. Bank. Finance 46 (2014), 233-245.; Caccioli, F.; Shrestha, M.; Moore, C.; Farmer, J. D., Stability analysis of financial contagion due to overlapping portfolios, J. Bank. Finance, 46, 233-245 (2014)
[5] N. Chen, X. Liu and D. D. Yao, An optimization view of financial systemic risk modeling: Network effect and market liquidity effect, Oper. Res. 64 (2016), no. 5, 1089-1108.; Chen, N.; Liu, X.; Yao, D. D., An optimization view of financial systemic risk modeling: Network effect and market liquidity effect, Oper. Res., 64, 5, 1089-1108 (2016) · Zbl 1352.90091
[6] R. Cifuentes, H. S. Shin and G. Ferrucci, Liquidity risk and contagion, J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. 3 (2005), no. 2-3, 556-566.; Cifuentes, R.; Shin, H. S.; Ferrucci, G., Liquidity risk and contagion, J. Eur. Econ. Assoc., 3, 2-3, 556-566 (2005)
[7] R. Cont, A. Moussa and E. B. E. Santos, Network structure and systemic risk in banking systems, Handbook on Systemic Risk, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2013), 327-368.; Cont, R.; Moussa, A.; Santos, E. B. E., Network structure and systemic risk in banking systems, Handbook on Systemic Risk, 327-368 (2013)
[8] R. Cont and L. Wagalath, Running for the exit: Distressed selling and endogenous correlation in financial markets, Math. Finance 23 (2013), no. 4, 718-741.; Cont, R.; Wagalath, L., Running for the exit: Distressed selling and endogenous correlation in financial markets, Math. Finance, 23, 4, 718-741 (2013) · Zbl 1275.91057
[9] R. Cont and L. Wagalath, Fire sale forensics: Measuring endogenous risk, Math. Finance 26 (2016), no. 4, 835-866.; Cont, R.; Wagalath, L., Fire sale forensics: Measuring endogenous risk, Math. Finance, 26, 4, 835-866 (2016) · Zbl 1348.91291
[10] L. Eisenberg and T. H. Noe, Systemic risk in financial systems, Manag. Sci. 47 (2001), no. 2, 236-249.; Eisenberg, L.; Noe, T. H., Systemic risk in financial systems, Manag. Sci., 47, 2, 236-249 (2001) · Zbl 1232.91688
[11] M. Elliott, B. Golub and M. O. Jackson, Financial networks and contagion, Amer. Econ. Rev. 104 (2014), no. 10, 3115-3153.; Elliott, M.; Golub, B.; Jackson, M. O., Financial networks and contagion, Amer. Econ. Rev., 104, 10, 3115-3153 (2014)
[12] H. Elsinger, Financial networks, cross holdings, and limited liability, Working paper 156, Österreichische Nationalbank, 2009.; Elsinger, H., Financial networks, cross holdings, and limited liability (2009)
[13] H. Elsinger, A. Lehar and M. Summer, Risk assessment for banking systems, Manag. Sci. 52 (2006), no. 9, 1301-1314.; Elsinger, H.; Lehar, A.; Summer, M., Risk assessment for banking systems, Manag. Sci., 52, 9, 1301-1314 (2006) · Zbl 1232.91689
[14] Z. Feinstein, Financial contagion and asset liquidation strategies, Oper. Res. 45 (2017), no. 2, 109-114.; Feinstein, Z., Financial contagion and asset liquidation strategies, Oper. Res., 45, 2, 109-114 (2017) · Zbl 1409.91288
[15] Z. Feinstein, B. Rudloff and S. Weber, Measures of systemic risk, preprint (2016), https://arxiv.org/abs/1502.07961v5; to appear in SIAM J. Financial Math.; Feinstein, Z.; Rudloff, B.; Weber, S., Measures of systemic risk (2016) · Zbl 1407.91284
[16] P. Gai and S. Kapadia, Contagion in financial networks, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 466 (2010), no. 2120, 2401-2423.; Gai, P.; Kapadia, S., Contagion in financial networks, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A, 466, 2120, 2401-2423 (2010) · Zbl 1193.91192
[17] P. Glasserman and H. P. Young, How likely is contagion in financial networks?, J. Bank. Finance 50 (2015), 383-399.; Glasserman, P.; Young, H. P., How likely is contagion in financial networks?, J. Bank. Finance, 50, 383-399 (2015)
[18] R. Greenwood, A. Landier and D. Thesmar, Vulnerable banks, J. Financ. Econ. 115 (2015), no. 3, 471-485.; Greenwood, R.; Landier, A.; Thesmar, D., Vulnerable banks, J. Financ. Econ., 115, 3, 471-485 (2015)
[19] A. Lehar, Measuring systemic risk: A risk management approach, J. Bank. Finance 29 (2005), no. 10, 2577-2603.; Lehar, A., Measuring systemic risk: A risk management approach, J. Bank. Finance, 29, 10, 2577-2603 (2005)
[20] E. Nier, J. Yang, T. Yorulmazer and A. Alentorn, Network models and financial stability, J. Econ. Dyn. Control 31 (2007), no. 6, 2033-2060.; Nier, E.; Yang, J.; Yorulmazer, T.; Alentorn, A., Network models and financial stability, J. Econ. Dyn. Control, 31, 6, 2033-2060 (2007) · Zbl 1201.91245
[21] L. C. G. Rogers and L. A. M. Veraart, Failure and rescue in an interbank network, Manag. Sci. 59 (2013), no. 4, 882-898.; Rogers, L. C. G.; Veraart, L. A. M., Failure and rescue in an interbank network, Manag. Sci., 59, 4, 882-898 (2013)
[22] H. Scarf, The approximation of fixed points of a continuous mapping, SIAM J. Appl. Math. 15 (1967), no. 5, 1328-1343.; Scarf, H., The approximation of fixed points of a continuous mapping, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 15, 5, 1328-1343 (1967) · Zbl 0153.49401
[23] C. Upper, Simulation methods to assess the danger of contagion in interbank markets, J. Financ. Stab. 7 (2011), no. 3, 111-125.; Upper, C., Simulation methods to assess the danger of contagion in interbank markets, J. Financ. Stab., 7, 3, 111-125 (2011)
[24] C. Zhou, Are banks too big to fail? Measuring systemic importance of financial institutions, Int. J. Central Banking 6 (2010), no. 34, 205-250.; Zhou, C., Are banks too big to fail? Measuring systemic importance of financial institutions, Int. J. Central Banking, 6, 34, 205-250 (2010)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.