Lexicographic expected utility without completeness. (English) Zbl 1378.91086
Summary: Standard theories of expected utility require that preferences are complete, and/or Archimedean. We present in this paper a theory of decision under uncertainty for both incomplete and non-Archimedean preferences. Without continuity assumptions, incomplete preferences on a lottery space reduce to an order-extension problem. It is well known that incomplete preferences can be extended to complete preferences in the full generality, but this result does not necessarily hold for incomplete preferences which satisfy the independence axiom, since it may obviously happen that the extension does not satisfy the independence axiom. We show, for incomplete preferences on a mixture space, that an extension which satisfies the independence axiom exists. We find necessary and sufficient conditions for a preorder on a finite lottery space to be representable by a family of lexicographic von Neumann-Morgenstern Expected Utility functions.
References:
| [1] | Aumann, R. (1962). Utility theory without the completeness axiom. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 445-462. · Zbl 0121.15202 |
| [2] | Baucells, M., & Shapley, L. S. (2008). Multiperson utility. Games and Economic Behavior, 62(2), 329-347. · Zbl 1145.91019 · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2007.07.002 |
| [3] | Blume, L., Brandenburger, A., & Dekel, E. (1989). An overview of lexicographic choice under uncertainty. Annals of Operations Research, 19(1), 229-246. · Zbl 0707.90025 · doi:10.1007/BF02283523 |
| [4] | Blume, L., Brandenburger, A., & Dekel, E. (1991). Lexicographic probabilities and equilibrium refinements. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 81-98. · Zbl 0729.90096 |
| [5] | Chipman, J. S. (1971). Non-archimedean behavior under risk: an elementary analysiswith application to the theory of assets. Chipman et al, 289-318. · Zbl 0227.90008 |
| [6] | Dubra, J. (2011). Continuity and completeness under risk. Mathematical Social Sciences, 61(1), 80-81. · Zbl 1208.91036 · doi:10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2010.11.001 |
| [7] | Dubra, J., Maccheroni, F., & Ok, E. A. (2004). Expected utility theory without the completeness axiom. Journal of Economic Theory, 115(1), 118-133. · Zbl 1062.91025 · doi:10.1016/S0022-0531(03)00166-2 |
| [8] | Encarnacion, J., Jr. (1964). Constraints and the firm’s utility function. The Review of Economic Studies, 113-120. · Zbl 1260.91092 |
| [9] | Evren, Ö. (2008). On the existence of expected multi-utility representations. Economic Theory, 35(3), 575-592. · Zbl 1143.91007 · doi:10.1007/s00199-007-0252-5 |
| [10] | Ferguson, C. (1965). The theory of multidimensional utility analysis in relation to multiple-goal business behavior: A synthesis. Southern Economic Journal, 169-175. |
| [11] | Fishburn, P. (1988). Nonlinear preference and utility theory. Johns Hopkins Series in the Mathematical Sciences. Wheatsheaf Books. · Zbl 0715.90001 |
| [12] | Fishburn, P. C. (1971). A study of lexicographic expected utility. Management Science, 17(11), 672-678. · Zbl 0227.90008 · doi:10.1287/mnsc.17.11.672 |
| [13] | Fishburn, P. C. (1982). The foundations of expected utility. : Theory & Decision Library. · Zbl 0497.90001 |
| [14] | Galaabaatar, T., & Karni, E. (2012). Expected multi-utility representations. Mathematical Social Sciences, 64(3), 242-246. · Zbl 1260.91092 · doi:10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2012.04.002 |
| [15] | Hausner, M. (1952). Multidimensional utilities. Technical report, DTIC Document · Zbl 0058.13804 |
| [16] | Herstein, I. N., & Milnor, J. (1953). An axiomatic approach to measurable utility. Econometrica, 21(2), 291-297. · Zbl 0050.36705 · doi:10.2307/1905540 |
| [17] | Kreps, D.M., & Ramey, G.(1987). Structural consistency, consistency, and sequential rationality. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1331-1348. · Zbl 0642.90108 |
| [18] | Luce, R. D., & Raiffa, H. (1957). Games and decisions: introduction and critical survey. Mineola: Courier Dover Publications. · Zbl 0084.15704 |
| [19] | Mandler, M. (2005). Incomplete preferences and rational intransitivity of choice. Games and Economic Behavior, 50(2), 255-277. · Zbl 1118.91035 · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2004.02.007 |
| [20] | Mongin, P. (2001). A note on mixture sets in decision theory. Decisions in Economics and Finance, 24(1), 59-69. · Zbl 1019.91013 · doi:10.1007/s102030170010 |
| [21] | Ok, E. A., Riella, G. (2013). Fully preorderable groups. · Zbl 1062.91025 |
| [22] | Ok, E. A., Ortoleva, P., & Riella, G. (2012). Incomplete preferences under uncertainty: Indecisiveness in beliefs versus tastes. Econometrica, 80(4), 1791-1808. · Zbl 1274.91149 · doi:10.3982/ECTA8040 |
| [23] | Schmeidler, D. (1971). A condition for the completeness of partial preference relations. Econometrica (pre-1986), 39(2), 403. · Zbl 0217.26703 · doi:10.2307/1913353 |
| [24] | von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1944). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press. · Zbl 0063.05930 |
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.
