×

Analysis of hybrid censored competing risks data. (English) Zbl 1367.62278

Summary: In this paper, we consider the analysis of hybrid censored competing risks data, based on Cox’s latent failure time model assumptions. It is assumed that lifetime distributions of latent causes of failure follow Weibull distribution with the same shape parameter, but different scale parameters. Maximum likelihood estimators (MLEs) of the unknown parameters can be obtained by solving a one-dimensional optimization problem, and we propose a fixed-point type algorithm to solve this optimization problem. Approximate MLEs have been proposed based on Taylor series expansion, and they have explicit expressions. Bayesian inference of the unknown parameters are obtained based on the assumption that the shape parameter has a log-concave prior density function, and for the given shape parameter, the scale parameters have Beta-Gamma priors. We propose to use Markov chain Monte Carlo samples to compute Bayes estimates and also to construct highest posterior density credible intervals. Monte Carlo simulations are performed to investigate the performances of the different estimators, and two data sets have been analysed for illustrative purposes.

MSC:

62N01 Censored data models
62N02 Estimation in survival analysis and censored data
62N05 Reliability and life testing
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] DOI: 10.1201/9781420035902 · doi:10.1201/9781420035902
[2] Cox DR, J R Stat Soc Ser. B. 21 pp 411– (1959)
[3] DOI: 10.2307/2530374 · Zbl 0392.62088 · doi:10.2307/2530374
[4] DOI: 10.1002/bimj.200210014 · doi:10.1002/bimj.200210014
[5] DOI: 10.1016/S0378-3758(96)00103-6 · Zbl 0874.62118 · doi:10.1016/S0378-3758(96)00103-6
[6] DOI: 10.1002/bimj.4710330808 · Zbl 0850.62807 · doi:10.1002/bimj.4710330808
[7] DOI: 10.1109/TR.2003.821946 · doi:10.1109/TR.2003.821946
[8] DOI: 10.1007/s13571-011-0024-x · Zbl 1268.62032 · doi:10.1007/s13571-011-0024-x
[9] DOI: 10.1214/aoms/1177728723 · Zbl 0058.35104 · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177728723
[10] DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2012.03.025 · Zbl 1365.62364 · doi:10.1016/j.csda.2012.03.025
[11] DOI: 10.1002/0471725234 · doi:10.1002/0471725234
[12] Pena EA, J R Stat Soc Ser. B. 52 pp 379– (1990)
[13] DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2012.06.002 · Zbl 1365.62096 · doi:10.1016/j.csda.2012.06.002
[14] DOI: 10.1080/01621459.1993.10476426 · doi:10.1080/01621459.1993.10476426
[15] DOI: 10.1198/004017008000000217 · doi:10.1198/004017008000000217
[16] DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2009.04.010 · Zbl 1453.62170 · doi:10.1016/j.csda.2009.04.010
[17] DOI: 10.1109/24.877338 · doi:10.1109/24.877338
[18] DOI: 10.1016/j.jspi.2006.06.043 · Zbl 1120.62081 · doi:10.1016/j.jspi.2006.06.043
[19] DOI: 10.1007/BF02242271 · Zbl 0561.65004 · doi:10.1007/BF02242271
[20] Lawless JF, Statistical models and methods for lifetime data (2003)
[21] DOI: 10.1016/S0378-3758(99)00193-7 · Zbl 1053.62110 · doi:10.1016/S0378-3758(99)00193-7
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.