×

A linear relational DEA model to evaluate two-stage processes with shared inputs. (English) Zbl 1359.90071

Summary: Two-stage data envelopment analysis (DEA) efficiency models identify the efficient frontier of a two-stage production process. In some two-stage processes, the inputs to the first stage are shared by the second stage, known as shared inputs. This paper proposes a new relational linear DEA model for dealing with measuring the efficiency score of two-stage processes with shared inputs under constant returns-to-scale assumption. Two case studies of banking industry and university operations are taken as two examples to illustrate the potential applications of the proposed approach.

MSC:

90C05 Linear programming
90C30 Nonlinear programming
90C90 Applications of mathematical programming

References:

[1] Agrell PJ, Hatami-Marbini A (2013) Frontier-based performance analysis models for supply chain management: state of the art and research directions. Comput Ind Eng 66(3):567-583
[2] Akther S, Fukuyama H, Weber WL (2013) Estimating two-stage network Slacks-based inefficiency: an application to Bangladesh banking. Omega 41(1):88-96 · doi:10.1016/j.omega.2011.02.009
[3] Amirteimoori A, Kordrostami S (2005) Multi-component efficiency measurement with imprecise data. Appl Math Comput 162:1265-1277 · Zbl 1058.62003
[4] Amirteimoori A, Emrouznejad A, Khoshandam L (2013) Classifying flexible measures in data envelopment analysis: a slacks-based measure. Measurement 46(10):4100-4107 · doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2013.08.019
[5] Banker RD, Charnes A, Cooper WW (1984) Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiency in data envelopment analysis. Manag Sci 30:1078-1092 · Zbl 0552.90055 · doi:10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078
[6] Banker RD, Kauffman RJ, Morey RC (1990) Measuring gains in operational efficiency from information technology: a study of the positran deployment at Hardee’s Inc. J Manag Inf Syst 7(2):29-54 · doi:10.1080/07421222.1990.11517888
[7] Barros CP, Managi S, Matousek R (2012) The technical efficiency of the Japanese banks: non-radial directional performance measurement with undesirable output. Omega 40(1):1-8 · doi:10.1016/j.omega.2011.02.005
[8] Beasley JE (1990) Comparing university departments. Omega 18(2):171-183 · doi:10.1016/0305-0483(90)90064-G
[9] Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res 2:429-444 · Zbl 0416.90080 · doi:10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
[10] Chen Y, Zhu J (2004) Measuring information technology’s indirect impact on firm performance. Inf Technol Manag J 5(1-2):9-22 · doi:10.1023/B:ITEM.0000008075.43543.97
[11] Chen Y, Liangb L, Yangb F, Zhu J (2006) Evaluation of information technology investment: a data envelopment analysis approach. Comput Oper Res 33:1368-1379 · Zbl 1126.91386 · doi:10.1016/j.cor.2004.09.021
[12] Chen Y, Du J, David H, Zhu SJ (2010) DEA model with shared resources and efficiency decomposition. Eur J Oper Res 207(1):339-349 · Zbl 1205.90146 · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2010.03.031
[13] Cook WD, Hababou M, Tuenter HJH (2000) Multicomponent efficiency measurement and shared inputs in data envelopment analysis: an application to sales and service performance in bank branches. J Product Anal 14:209-224 · doi:10.1023/A:1026598803764
[14] Cook WD, Zhu J (2007) Classifying inputs and outputs in DEA. Eur J Oper Res 180:692-699 · Zbl 1123.90044 · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2006.03.048
[15] Cook WD, Liang L, Zhu J (2010) Measuring performance of two-stage network structures by DEA: a review and future perspective. Omega 38:423-430 · doi:10.1016/j.omega.2009.12.001
[16] de Mello Soares JCCB, Gomes EG, Angulo Meza L, Soares de Mello MHC, Soares de Mello AJR (2006) Engineering post-graduate programmes: a quality and productivity analysis. Stud Edu Eval 32:136-152
[17] Ebrahimnejad A, Tavana M, Lotfi FH, Shahverdi R, Yousefpour M (2014) A three-stage data envelopment analysis model with application to banking industry. Measurement 49:308-319 · doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2013.11.043
[18] Emrouznejad A, Anouze AL (2010) DEA/C&R: DEA with classification and regression tree: a case of banking efficiency. Expert Syst 27(4):231-246 · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0394.2010.00516.x
[19] Emrouznejad A, Anouze AL (2009) A note on the modeling the efficiency of top Arab banks. Expert Syst Appl 36 (3, part 1):5741-5744 · Zbl 1247.90194
[20] Emrouznejad A, Parker BR, Tavares G (2008) Evaluation of research in efficiency and productivity: a thirty years survey of the scholarly literature in DEA. Soc Econ Plan 42(3):151-157
[21] Fare R, Grosskopf S (2000) Network DEA. Soc Econ Plan Sci 34(1):35-49 · Zbl 1185.90023 · doi:10.1016/S0038-0121(99)00012-9
[22] Jahanshahloo GR, Amirteimoori AR, Kordrostami S (2004) Measuring the multi-component efficiency with shared inputs and outputs in data envelopment analysis. Appl Math Comput 155:283-293 · Zbl 1134.90442
[23] Kao C, Hwang S-N (2008) Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: an application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan. Eur J Oper Res 185:418-429 · Zbl 1137.91497 · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2006.11.041
[24] Kao C (2009) Efficiency decomposition in network data envelopment analysis: a relational model. Eur J Oper Res 192:949-962 · Zbl 1157.90494 · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2007.10.008
[25] Kao C, Hwang S-N (2010) Efficiency measurement for network systems: IT impact on firm performance. Decis Support Syst 48(3):437-446 · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2009.06.002
[26] Kao C (2014) Network data envelopment analysis: a review. Eur J Oper Res 239:1-16 · Zbl 1339.90005 · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2014.02.039
[27] Kwimbere FJ (1987) Measuring efficiency in not-for-profit organisations: an attempt to evaluate efficiency in selected UK university departments using data envelopment analysis (DEAl. MSC thesis). School of Management, University of Bath, Claverton Down. Bath BA2 7AY, UK
[28] Paradi JC, Rouatt S, Zhu H (2011) Two-stage evaluation of bank branch efficiency using data envelopment analysis. Omega 39(1):99-109 · doi:10.1016/j.omega.2010.04.002
[29] Paradi JC, Zhu H (2013) A survey on bank branch efficiency and performance research with data envelopment analysis. Omega 1(1):61-79 · doi:10.1016/j.omega.2011.08.010
[30] Premachandra IM, Chen Y, Watson J (2011) DEA as a tool for predicting corporate failure and success: a case of bankruptcy assessment. Omega 39(6):620-626 · doi:10.1016/j.omega.2011.01.002
[31] Tavassoli M, Faramarzi GR, Farzipoor Saen R (2014) Efficiency and effectiveness in airline performance using a SBM-NDEA model in the presence of shared input. J Air Trans Manag 34:146-153 · doi:10.1016/j.jairtraman.2013.09.001
[32] Toloo M (2009) On classifying inputs and outputs in DEA: a revised model. Eur J Oper Res 198:358-360 · Zbl 1163.90674 · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2008.08.017
[33] Toloo M, Sohrabi B, Nalchigar S (2009) A new method for ranking discovered rules from data mining by DEA. Expert Syst Appl 36(4):8503-8508 · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2008.10.038
[34] Toloo M (2012) Alternative solutions for classifying inputs and outputs in data envelopment analysis. Comput Math Appl 63:1104-1110 · Zbl 1247.90194 · doi:10.1016/j.camwa.2011.12.016
[35] Toloo M (2013) The most efficient unit without explicit inputs: an extended MILP-DEA model. Measurement 46(9):3628-3634 · doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2013.06.030
[36] Toloo M (2014a) Notes on classifying inputs and outputs in data envelopment analysis: a comment. Eur J Oper Res 235(3):810-812 · Zbl 1305.90300
[37] Toloo M (2014b) An epsilon-free approach for finding the most efficient unit in DEA. Appl Math Model 38:3182-3192 · Zbl 1427.90183
[38] Tomkins C, Green R (1988) An experiment in the use of data envelopment analysis for evaluating the efficiency of UK university departments of accounting. Fin Account Mgmt 4(2):147-164 · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0408.1988.tb00066.x
[39] Wang CH, Gopal R, Zionts S (1997) Use of data envelopment analysis in assessing information technology impact on firm performance. Ann Oper Res 73:191-213 · Zbl 0891.90018 · doi:10.1023/A:1018977111455
[40] Yu M, Fan C (2009) Measuring the performance of multimode bus transit: a mixed structure network DEA model. Trans Res Part E 45:501-515 · doi:10.1016/j.tre.2008.10.001
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.