×

Selfishness, fraternity, and other-regarding preference in spatial evolutionary games. (English) Zbl 1337.91024

Summary: Spatial evolutionary games are studied with myopic players whose payoff interest, as a personal character, is tuned from selfishness to other-regarding preference via fraternity. The players are located on a square lattice and collect income from symmetric two-person two-strategy (called cooperation and defection) games with their nearest neighbors. During the elementary steps of evolution a randomly chosen player modifies her strategy in order to maximize stochastically her utility function composed from her own and the co-players’ income with weight factors \(1-Q\) and \(Q\). These models are studied within a wide range of payoff parameters using Monte Carlo simulations for noisy strategy updates and by spatial stability analysis in the low noise limit. For fraternal players \((Q=1/2)\) the system evolves into ordered arrangements of strategies in the low noise limit in a way providing optimum payoff for the whole society. Dominance of defectors, representing the “tragedy of the commons”, is found within the regions of prisoner’s dilemma and stag hunt game for selfish players \((Q=0)\). Due to the symmetry in the effective utility function the system exhibits similar behavior even for \(Q=1\) that can be interpreted as the “lovers’ dilemma”.

MSC:

91A22 Evolutionary games

References:

[1] Barash, D. P., The Survival Game (2003), Times Books: Times Books New York
[2] Blume, L. E., How noise matters, Games Econ. Behav., 44, 251-271 (2003) · Zbl 1056.91011
[3] Bolton, G. E.; Ockenfels, A., A theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition, Am. Econ. Rev., 90, 166-193 (2000)
[4] Bolton, G. E.; Ockenfels, A., Inequality aversion, efficiency, and maximum preferences in simple distribution experiments: comment, Am. Econ. Rev., 96, 1906-1911 (2006)
[5] Bray, A. J., Theory of phase ordering kinetics, Adv. Phys., 43, 357-459 (1994)
[6] Camerer, C. F., Behavioral Game Theory (2003), Princeton University Press: Princeton University Press Princeton · Zbl 1019.91001
[7] Chen, X.-J.; Wang, L., Cooperation enhanced by moderate tolerance ranges in myopically selective interactions, Phys. Rev. E, 80, 046109 (2009)
[8] Dai, Q.; Li, H.; Cheng, H.; Li, Y.; Yang, J., Double-dealing behavior potentially promotes cooperation in evolutionary prisoner’s dilemma games, New J. Phys., 12, 113015 (2010)
[9] Dawes, R. M., Social dilemmas, Ann. Rev. Psychol., 31, 169-193 (1980)
[10] Fehr, E.; Fischbacher, U., The nature of human altruism, Nature, 425, 785-791 (2003)
[11] Fehr, E.; Gächter, S., Altruistic punishment in humans, Nature, 415, 137-140 (2002)
[12] Fehr, E.; Schmidt, K., A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation, Q. J. Econ., 114, 817-868 (1999) · Zbl 0944.91022
[13] Flood, M. M., Some experimental games, Manage. Sci., 5, 5-26 (1958) · Zbl 0995.91505
[14] Frohlich, N., Self-interest or altruism, what difference, J. Conflict Resolut., 18, 55-73 (1974)
[15] Gintis, H., The Bounds of Reason: Game Theory and Unification of the Behavioral Sciences (2010), Princeton University Press: Princeton University Press Princeton
[16] Glauber, R. J., Time-dependent statistics of the Ising model, J. Math. Phys., 4, 294-307 (1963) · Zbl 0145.24003
[17] Grafen, A., The hawk-dove game played between relatives, Anim. Behav., 27, 905-907 (1979)
[18] Harsanyi, J. C.; Selten, R., A General Theory of Equilibrium Selection in Games (1988), MIT Press: MIT Press Cambridge, MA · Zbl 0693.90098
[19] Li, Y.; Jin, X.; Su, X.; Kong, F.; Peng, C., Cooperation and charity in spatial public goods game under different strategy update rules, Physica A, 389, 1090-1098 (2010)
[20] Lion, S., The evolution of juvenile-adult interactions in populations structured in age and space, Theor. Popul. Biol., 76, 132-145 (2009) · Zbl 1213.92043
[21] Liu, R.-R.; Rong, Z.; Jia, C.-X.; Wang, B.-H., Effects of diverse inertia on scale-free-networked prisoner’s dilemma games, EPL, 91, 20002 (2010)
[22] Maynard Smith, J., Evolution and the Theory of Games (1982), Cambridge University Press: Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK · Zbl 0526.90102
[23] Milinski, M.; Lüthi, J. H.; Eggler, R.; Parker, G. A., Cooperation under predation risk: experiments on costs and benefits, Proc. R. Soc. London B, 264, 831-837 (1997)
[24] Mitteldorf, J.; Wilson, D. S., Population viscosity and the evolution of altruism, J. Theor. Biol., 204, 481-496 (2000)
[25] Nowak, M. A., Evolutionary Dynamics (2006), Harvard University Press: Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA · Zbl 1098.92051
[26] Nowak, M. A.; May, R. M., Evolutionary games and spatial chaos, Nature, 359, 826-829 (1992)
[27] Nowak, M. A.; May, R. M., The spatial dilemmas of evolution, Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos, 3, 35-78 (1993) · Zbl 0870.92011
[28] Perc, M., Evolution of cooperation on scale-free networks subject to error and attack, New J. Phys., 11, 033027 (2009)
[29] Perc, M.; Szolnoki, A., Coevolutionary games—a mini review, BioSystems, 99, 109-125 (2010)
[30] Roca, C. P.; Cuesta, J. A.; Sánchez, A., Evolutionary game theory: temporal and spatial effects beyond replicator dynamics, Phys. Life Rev., 6, 208-249 (2009)
[31] Rong, Z.; Wu, Z.-X.; Wang, W.-X., Emergence of cooperation through coevolving time scale in spatial prisoner’s dilemma, Phys. Rev. E, 82, 026101 (2010)
[32] Santos, F. C.; Pacheco, J. M.; Lenaerts, T., Evolutionary dynamics of social dilemmas in structured heterogeneous populations, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 103, 3490-3494 (2006)
[33] Scheuring, I., Coevolution of honest signaling and cooperative norms by cultural group selection, BioSystems, 101, 79-87 (2010)
[34] Scheuring, I., Egalitarian motive in punishing defectors, J. Theor. Biol., 264, 1293-1295 (2010)
[35] Sigmund, K., The Calculus of Selfishness (2010), Princeton University Press: Princeton University Press Princeton, MA · Zbl 1189.91010
[36] Stanley, H. E., Introduction to Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena (1971), Clarendon Press: Clarendon Press Oxford
[37] Sysi-Aho, M.; Saramäki, J.; Kertész, J.; Kaski, K., Spatial snowdrift game with myopic agents, Eur. Phys. J. B, 44, 129-135 (2005)
[38] Szabó, G.; Fáth, G., Evolutionary games on graphs, Phys. Rep., 446, 97-216 (2007)
[39] Szabó, G.; Szolnoki, A.; Varga, M.; Hanusovszky, L., Ordering in spatial evolutionary games for pairwise collective strategy updates, Phys. Rev. E, 82, 026110 (2010)
[40] Taylor, C.; Nowak, M. A., Transforming the dilemma, Evolution, 61, 2281-2292 (2007)
[41] Taylor, C.; Nowak, M. M., Evolutionary game dynamics with non-uniform interaction rates, Theor. Popul. Biol., 69, 243-252 (2006) · Zbl 1109.92037
[42] von Neumann, J.; Morgenstern, O., Theory of Games and Economic Behaviour (1944), Princeton University Press: Princeton University Press Princeton · Zbl 0063.05930
[43] Wang, W.-X.; Ren, J.; Chen, G.; Wang, B.-H., Memory-based snowdrift game on networks, Phys. Rev. E, 74, 056113 (2006)
[44] Wang, Z.; Du, W.-B.; Cao, X.-B.; Zhang, L.-Z., Integrating neighborhoods in the evaluation of fitness promotes cooperation in the spatial prisoner’s dilemma game, Physica A, 390, 1234-1239 (2011)
[45] Wild, G.; Traulsen, A., The different limits of weak selection and the evolutionary dynamics of finite populations, J. Theor. Biol., 247, 382-390 (2007) · Zbl 1455.92112
[46] Xianyu, B., Other-regarding preference and the evolutionary prisoner’s dilemma on complex networks, Physica A, 389, 1105-1114 (2010)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.