×

\(H_{2}/H_{\infty}\) control for discrete TDS with application to networked control systems: periodic and asynchronous communication. (English) Zbl 1315.93057

Summary: This paper is concerned with the design of mixed \(H_{2}/H_{\infty}\) controllers for discrete-time delay systems and networked control systems. The controllers are obtained by solving a constrained optimization problem. Those constraints are suitably transformed into linear matrix inequalities, in such a way that the problem is solved using available algorithms. The stability is ensured resorting to the Lyapunov-Krasovskii theory. Additionally, the paper investigates an asynchronous event-based sampling policy that allows a reduction of the bandwidth usage and the energy consumption. The relation between the boundedness of the stability region and the threshold that triggers the events is studied. The robustness and performance of the proposed technique is showed by numerical simulations.

MSC:

93C55 Discrete-time control/observation systems
93D05 Lyapunov and other classical stabilities (Lagrange, Poisson, \(L^p, l^p\), etc.) in control theory
93B36 \(H^\infty\)-control
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] ZampieriS. Trends in networked control systems. 17th World Congress IFAC, Seoul, Korea, July 2008; 2886-2894.
[2] NiculescuSI. Delay Effects on Stability. Lecture notes in control and information sciences, Vol. 269. Springer Verlag: Berlin, 2001. · Zbl 0997.93001
[3] BushnellL. Networks and control. IEEE Control System Magazine (Special Section on Networks and Control)2001; 21(1):22-99.
[4] ZhangW, BranickyMS, PhillipsSM. Stability of networked control systems. IEEE Control Systems Magazine2001; 21(1):84-99.
[5] OrihuelaL, MillánP, VivasC, RubioFR. Robust stability of nonlinear time‐delay systems with interval time‐varying delay. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control2011; 21(7):709-724. · Zbl 1222.93173
[6] RichardJP. Time‐delay systems: an overview of some recent advances and open problems. Automatica2003; 39(10):1667-1694. · Zbl 1145.93302
[7] ChenWH, GuanZH, LuX. Delay‐dependent guaranteed cost control for uncertain discrete‐time systems with delay. IEE Proceedings ‐ Control Theory and Applications2003; 150(4):412-416.
[8] FridmanE, ShakedU. Stability and guaranteed cost control of uncertain discrete delay systems. International Journal of Control2005; 78(4):235-246. · Zbl 1083.93045
[9] LiS, WangZ, SunY. Guaranteed cost control of networked control systems: an LMI approach. Lecture Notes in Computer Science2005; 3605: 130-136.
[10] LiS, WangZ, SunY, YuL. LMI approach to guaranteed cost control for networked control systems. Developments in Chemical Engineering and Mineral Processing2005; 13(3‐4):351-361.
[11] WuL, LamJ, YaoX, XiongJ. Robust guaranteed cost control of discrete‐time networked control systems. Optimal Control, Applications and Methods2011; 32(1):95-112. · Zbl 1213.93180
[12] KimJH, ParkHB. H_∞ state feedback control for generalized continuous/discrete time‐delay system. Automatica1999; 35(8):1443-1451. · Zbl 0954.93011
[13] KimJH. Delay‐dependent robust H_∞ control for discrete‐time uncertain singular systems with interval time‐varying delays in state and control input. Journal of the Franklin Institute2010; 347(9):1704-1722. · Zbl 1202.93083
[14] MaS, ZhangC, ChengZ. Delay‐dependent robust h_∞ control for uncertain discrete‐time singular systems with time‐delays. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics2010; 217: 194-211. · Zbl 1142.93011
[15] MengX, LamJ, GaoH. Network‐based H_∞ control for stochastic systems. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control2009; 19(3):295-312. · Zbl 1163.93034
[16] TabuadaP. Event‐triggered real‐time scheduling of stabilizing. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control2007; 52(9):1680-1685. · Zbl 1366.90104
[17] AntaA, TabuadaP. To sample or not to sample: self‐triggered control for nonlinear systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control2010; 55(9):2030-2042. · Zbl 1368.93355
[18] MillánP, OrihuelaL, VivasC, RubioFR. An optimal control L_2‐gain disturbance rejection design for networked control systems. American Control Conference, Baltimore, Maryland, USA, 2010; 1344-1349.
[19] MillánP, OrihuelaL, Muñoz de la PeñaD, VivasC, RubioFR. Self‐triggered sampling selection based on quadratic programming. 18th IFAC World Congress, Milano, Italy, 2011; 8896-8901.
[20] GaoH, ChenT. New results on stability of discrete‐time systems with time‐varying state delay. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control2007; 52(2):328-334. · Zbl 1366.39011
[21] HeY, WuM, LiuGP, SheJH. Output feedback stabilization for a discrete‐time system with a time‐varying delay. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control2008; 53(10):2372-2377. · Zbl 1367.93507
[22] YueD, HanQL, LamJ. Network‐based robust H_∞ control of systems with uncertainty. Automatica2005; 41(6):999-1007. · Zbl 1091.93007
[23] MoonYS, ParkP, KwonWH, LeeYS. Delay‐dependent robust stabilization of uncertain state‐delayed systems. International Journal of Control2001; 74(14):1447-1455. · Zbl 1023.93055
[24] El GhaouiL, OustryF, AitRamiM. A cone complementary linearization algorithm for static output‐feedback and related problems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control1997; 42(8):1171-1176. · Zbl 0887.93017
[25] MazoM, AntaA, TabuadaP. On self‐triggered control for linear systems: guarantees and complexity. European Control Conference, 2009.
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.