×

Two extensions of Thurston’s spectral theorem for surface diffeomorphisms. (English) Zbl 1311.37035

Let \(M\) be a closed orientable surface of genus \(g\geq 2\) and \(f\) a diffeomorphism of \(M\). A classical result of Thurston states the existence of algebraic integers \( 1 \leq \lambda_1 < \dots < \lambda_K\) such that for any simple closed curve \(\alpha\) on \(M\), there is a \(\lambda_i\) such that \[ \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} l_\rho (f^n \alpha)^{1/n} = \lambda_i \] where \(\rho\) is any Riemannian metric on \(M\) and \(l_\rho\) is the infimum of the length of curves isotopic to \(\alpha\). Moreover, \(f\) is pseudo-Anosov if and only if \(K=1\) and \(\lambda_1 >1\). The main purpose of the paper is to extend this result in two directions.
The first extension concerns random products of homeomorphisms. More precisely, for any integrable ergodic cocycle \(f_n = g_n g_{n-1} \cdots g_1\) of orientation-preserving homeomorphisms of \(M\), there exists almost surely a constant \(\lambda \geq 1\) and a measured foliation \(\mu\) such that for any simple closed curve \(\alpha\) such that \(i (\mu , \alpha) > 0\), and any Riemannian metric \(\rho\) : \[ \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} l_\rho (f_n \alpha)^{1/n} = \lambda. \]
Moreover, given certain conditions of independence and support on the cocycle \(f_n\), one can obtain that \(\lambda > 1\). Heuristically, it means that random walk trajectories eventually look pseudo-Anosov from the perspective of Thurston’s result.
A second extension concerns holomorphic self-maps of Teichmüller space \(\mathcal{T}(M)\). For such a map \(f\) and a point \(x\) in Teichmüller space, there exists a number \(\lambda \geq 1\) such that the extremal length of any isotopy class of curve \(\beta\) on the complex structure \(f^n x\) is bounded below by \(\lambda^n\) times a constant.
It is well known that the mapping class group is isomorphic to the complex automorphism group of \(\mathcal{T}(M)\). So the previous result leads to a weak generalization of the Nielsen-Thurston classification of mapping classes to general holomorphic self-maps of Teichmüller spaces.

MSC:

37F30 Quasiconformal methods and Teichmüller theory, etc. (dynamical systems) (MSC2010)
22D40 Ergodic theory on groups
30F60 Teichmüller theory for Riemann surfaces
32G15 Moduli of Riemann surfaces, Teichmüller theory (complex-analytic aspects in several variables)
37E30 Dynamical systems involving homeomorphisms and diffeomorphisms of planes and surfaces
37H15 Random dynamical systems aspects of multiplicative ergodic theory, Lyapunov exponents
57Sxx Topological transformation groups

References:

[1] S.Antonakoudis, ‘The bounded orbit conjecture for complex manifolds’, Preprint, 2013, http://math.harvard.edu/∼stergios/papers/bounded_orbits.pdf.
[2] L.Arnold, Random dynamical systems. Springer Monographs in Mathematics (Springer, Berlin, 1998). · Zbl 0906.34001
[3] L.Bers, ‘An extremal problem for quasiconformal mappings and a theorem by Thurston’, Acta Math., 141 (1978) 73-98. · Zbl 0389.30018
[4] Y.‐E.Choi, K.Rafi, ‘Comparison between Teichmüller and Lipschitz metrics’, J. Lond. Math. Soc., (2)76 (2007, 739-756. · Zbl 1132.30024
[5] M.Duchin, ‘Thin triangles and a multiplicative ergodic theorem for Teichmüller geometry’, http://front.math.ucdavis.edu/math.GT/0508046.
[6] C. J.Earle, ‘Schwarz’s lemma and Teichmüller contraction’, Complex manifolds and hyperbolic geometry (Guanajuato, 2001), Contemporary Mathematics 311 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2002) 79-85. · Zbl 1030.30018
[7] B.Farb, A.Margalit, A primer on mapping class groups, Princeton Mathematical Series 49 (Princeton University Press), Princeton, NJ, 2012).
[8] B.Farb, H.Masur, ‘Superrigidity and mapping class groups’, Topology, 37 (1998) 1169-1176. · Zbl 0946.57018
[9] A.Fathi, F.Laudenbach, V.Poénaru, Travaux de Thurston sur les surfaces, Astérisque 66-67 (Société Mathématique de France, Paris, 1979). · Zbl 0406.00016
[10] V.Gadre, ‘Harmonic measures for distributions with finite support on the mapping class group are singular’, Preprint, 2009, http://arxiv.org/abs/0911.2891.
[11] F.Gardiner, M.Masur, ‘Extremal length geometry of Teichmüller space’, Complex Var, 16 (1991) 23-41.
[12] V. A.Kaimanovich, ‘The Poisson formula for groups with hyperbolic properties’, Ann. of Math. (2), 152 (2000) 659-692. · Zbl 0984.60088
[13] V. A.Kaimanovich, H.Masur, ‘The Poisson boundary of the mapping class group’, Invent. Math., 125 (1996) 221-264. · Zbl 0864.57014
[14] A.Karlsson, ‘Non‐expanding maps and Busemann functions’, Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems, 21 (2001) 1447-1457. · Zbl 1072.37028
[15] A.Karlsson, ‘On the dynamics of isometries’, Geom. Topol., 9 (2005) 2359-2394. · Zbl 1120.53026
[16] A.Karlsson, F.Ledrappier, ‘On laws of large numbers for random walks’, Ann. Probab., 34 (2006) 1693-1706. · Zbl 1111.60005
[17] A.Karlsson, F.Ledrappier, ‘Noncommutative ergodic theorems’, Geometry, rigidity, and group actions, Chicago Lectures in Mathematics (University Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 2011) 396-418. · Zbl 1339.37005
[18] L.Liu, A.Papadopoulos, W.Su, G.Théret, ‘On the classification of mapping class actions on Thurston’s asymmetric metric’, Preprint, 2011, arXiv:1110.3601v1.
[19] L.Liu, W.Su, ‘The horofunction compactification of Teichmüller metric’, Handbook of Teichmüller theory, Vol. IV (ed. A.Papadopoulos (ed.)) IRMA Lecture Notes in Mathematics and Theoretical Physics 19 (EMS Publishing House, Zürich, 2013).
[20] J.Maher, ‘Random walks on the mapping class group’, Duke Math. J., 156 (2011) 429-468. · Zbl 1213.37072
[21] H.Masur, ‘Random walks on Teichmuller space and the mapping class group’, J. Anal. Math., 67 (1995) 117-164. · Zbl 0856.32014
[22] C.McMullen, ‘Iteration on Teichmüller space’, Invent. Math., 99 (1990) 425-454. · Zbl 0695.57012
[23] H.Miyachi, ‘Teichmüller rays and the Gardiner-Masur boundary of Teichmüller space’, Geom. Dedicata, 137 (2008) 113-141. · Zbl 1165.30023
[24] H.Miyachi, ‘Teichmüller space has non‐Busemann points’, Preprint, 2011, arXiv:1105.307v1.
[25] J.Nielsen, ‘Untersuchungen zur Topologie der geschlossenen zweiseitigen Flächen’, Acta Math., 50 (1927) 189-358; 53 (1929) 1-76; 58 (1932) 87-167; 75 (1943) 23-115. · JFM 53.0545.12
[26] J.Nielsen, ‘Surface transformation classes of algebraically finite type’, Danske Vid. Selsk. Math.‐Phys. Medd., 21 (1944). · Zbl 0063.05952
[27] A.Papadopoulos, G.Théret, ‘On the topology defined by Thurston’s asymmetric metric’, Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc., 142 (2007) 487-496. · Zbl 1120.32009
[28] K. M.Pilgrim, ‘Canonical Thurston obstructions’, Adv. Math., 158 (2001) 154-168. · Zbl 1193.57002
[29] N.Selinger, ‘Thurston’s pullback map on the augmented Teichmüller space and applications’, Invent. Math, 189 (2012) 111-142. · Zbl 1298.37033
[30] W.Thurston, ‘Minimal stretch maps between hyperbolic surfaces’, Preprint, 1986, arXiv:mathGT/9801039.
[31] W. P.Thurston, ‘On the geometry and dynamics of diffeomorphisms of surfaces’, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.), 19 (1988) 417-431. · Zbl 0674.57008
[32] G.Tiozzo, ‘Sublinear deviation between geodesics and sample paths’, Preprint, 2012, arXiv:1210.7352.
[33] C.Walsh, ‘The horoboundary and isometry group of Thurston’s Lipschitz metric’, Handbook of Teichmüller theory, Vol. IV (ed. A.Papadopoulos (ed.)) IRMA Lecture Notes in Mathematics and Theoretical Physics 19 (EMS Publishing House, Zürich, 2013).
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.