×

A parametric bootstrap approach for the equality of coefficients of variation. (English) Zbl 1306.65072

Summary: In this article, a parametric bootstrap approach for testing the equality of coefficient of variation of \(k\) normal populations is proposed. Simulations show that the actual size of our proposed test is close to the nominal level, irrespective of the number of populations and sample sizes, and that this new approach is better than the other existing ones. Also, the power of our approach is satisfactory. An example is proposed for illustrating our new approach.

MSC:

62-08 Computational methods for problems pertaining to statistics

Software:

bootstrap
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Amiri S, Zwanzig S (2010) An improvement of the nonparametric bootstrap test for the comparison of the coefficient of variations. Commun Stat Simul Comput 39:1726-1734 · Zbl 1205.62049 · doi:10.1080/03610918.2010.512693
[2] Bennett, BM; Ziegler, WJ (ed.), On an approximate test for homogeneity of coefficients of variation, 169-171 (1976), Basel and Stuttgart · Zbl 0324.62039 · doi:10.1007/978-3-0348-5513-6_16
[3] Cabras S, Mostallino G, Racugno W (2006) A nonparametric bootstrap test for the equality of coefficients of variation. Commun Stat Simul Comput 35:715-726 · Zbl 1104.62046 · doi:10.1080/03610910600716829
[4] Cochran WG (1937) Problems arising in the analysis of a series of similar experiments. J R Stat Soc (Supplement) 4:102-118 · JFM 63.1101.01 · doi:10.2307/2984123
[5] Doornbos R, Dijkstra JB (1983) A multi sample test for the equality of coefficients of variation in normal populations. Commun Stat Simul Comput 12:147-158 · doi:10.1080/03610918308812308
[6] Efron B, Tibshirani RJ (1993) An introduction to the bootstrap. Chapman & Hall, London · Zbl 0835.62038
[7] Feltz CJ, Miller GE (1996) An asymptotic test for the equality of coefficients of variation from \[k\] k populations. Stat Med 15:647-658 · doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960330)15:6<647::AID-SIM184>3.0.CO;2-P
[8] Forkman J (2009) Estimator and tests for common coefficients of variation in normal distributions. Commun Stat Theory Methods 38:233-251 · Zbl 1292.62034 · doi:10.1080/03610920802187448
[9] Fung WK, Tsang TS (1998) A simulation study comparing tests for the equality of coefficients of variation. Stat Med 17:2003-2014 · doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19980915)17:17<2003::AID-SIM889>3.0.CO;2-I
[10] Gupta RC, Ma S (1996) Testing the equality of coefficients of variation in \[k\] k normal populations. Commun Stat Theory Methods 25:115-132 · Zbl 0875.62077 · doi:10.1080/03610929608831683
[11] Hedges L, Olkin I (1985) Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Academic Press, Orlando, FL · Zbl 0666.62002
[12] Horowitz J (1995) Bootstrap methods in econometrics: theory and numerical performance. 128.118.178.162/eps/em/papers/9602/9602009.pdf · Zbl 0850.62210
[13] Horowitz, J.; Heckman, J. (ed.); Leamer, E. (ed.), The bootstrap, No. 5, 3162 (2001), Amsterdam
[14] Krishnamoorthy K, Lu F, Mathew T (2007) A parametric bootstrap approach for ANOVA with unequal variances: fixed and random models. Comput Stat Data Anal 51:5731-5742 · Zbl 1445.62187 · doi:10.1016/j.csda.2006.09.039
[15] Lohrding RK (1975) A two sample test of equality of coefficients of variation or relative errors. J Stat Compt Simul 4:31-36 · Zbl 0322.62025 · doi:10.1080/00949657508810107
[16] MacKinnon JG (2006) Bootstrap methods in econometrics. The Economic Record, vol 82, Special Issue, September 2006, S2-S18 · Zbl 0322.62025
[17] McKay A (1932) Distribution of the coefficient of variation and the extended t distribution. J R Stat Soc 95:695-698 · Zbl 0005.30204 · doi:10.2307/2342041
[18] Miller GE (1991a) Asymptotic test statistics for coefficients of variation. Commun Stat Theory Methods 20:3351-3363 · Zbl 1323.37032 · doi:10.1080/03610929108830707
[19] Miller GE (1991b) Use of the squared ranks test to test for the equality of the coefficients of variation. Commun Stat Simul Comput 20:743-750 · Zbl 0850.62386 · doi:10.1080/03610919108812981
[20] Nairy KS, Rao KA (2003) Tests of coefficient of variation of normal population. Commun Stat Simul Comput 32:641-661 · Zbl 1081.62511 · doi:10.1081/SAC-120017854
[21] Pardo MC, Pardo JA (2000) Use of Rényi’s divergence to test for the equality of the coefficient of variation. J Comput. Appl. Math. 116:93-104 · Zbl 0970.62005 · doi:10.1016/S0377-0427(99)00312-X
[22] Rao KA, Bhatt ARS (1995) Tests for coefficient of variation. J Indian Soc Agric Stat 47:225-229
[23] Rao KA, Jose CT (2001) Test for equality of coefficient of variation of \[k\] k populations. In: Proceeding the 53rd Session of International Statistical Institute, Seoul, Korea
[24] Rao KA, Vidya R (1992) On the performance of test for coefficient of variation. Calcutta Stat Assoc Bull 42:87-95 · Zbl 0850.62210
[25] Shafer NJ, Sullivan JA (1986) A simulation study of a test for the equality of the coefficients of variation. Commun Stat Simul Comput 15:681-695 · doi:10.1080/03610918608812532
[26] Tian L, Ma C, Vexler A (2009) A parametric bootstrap test for comparing heteroscedastic regression models. Commun Stat Simul Comput 38:1026-1036 · Zbl 1163.62022 · doi:10.1080/03610910902737077
[27] Tsou TS (2009) A robust score test for testing several coefficients of variation with unknown underlying distributions. Commun Stat Theory Methods 38:1350-1360 · Zbl 1165.62014 · doi:10.1080/03610920802431036
[28] Verrill S, Johnson RA (2007a) Confidence bounds and hypothesis tests for normal distribution coefficients of variation. USDA Forest Products Laboratory Research Paper, FPL-RP-638 · Zbl 1124.62014
[29] Verrill S, Johnson RA (2007b) Confidence bounds and hypothesis tests for normal distribution coefficients of variation. Commun Stat Theory Methods 36:2187-2206 · Zbl 1124.62014 · doi:10.1080/03610920701215126
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.