×

Modeling interval-censored, clustered cow udder quarter infection times through the shared gamma frailty model. (English) Zbl 1306.62230

Summary: Time to infection data are often simultaneously clustered and interval-censored. The time to infection is not known exactly; it is only known to have occurred within a certain interval. Moreover, observations often occur in clusters. Consequently, the independence assumption does not hold. Here we propose an extension of the shared gamma frailty model to handle the interval censoring and clustering simultaneously. We show that the frailties can be integrated out analytically, allowing maximization of the marginal likelihood to obtain parameter estimates. We apply our method to a longitudinal study with periodic follow-up on dairy cows to investigate the effect of parameters at the cow level (e.g., parity) and also parameters that can change within the cow (e.g., front or rear udder quarter) on time to infection. Dairy cows were assessed approximately monthly for the presence of a bacterial infection at the udder-quarter level, thus generating interval-censored data. Obviously, the four udder quarters are clustered within the cow. Based on simulations, we find that ignoring the interval-censored nature of the data can lead to biased parameter estimates.

MSC:

62P10 Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Adkinson, R. W., Ingawa, K. H., Blouin, D. C., and Nickerson, S. C. (1993), ”Distribution of Clinical Mastitis Among Quarters of the Bovine Udder,” Journal of Dairy Science, 76, 3453–3459. · doi:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(93)77684-5
[2] Barkema, H. W., Schukken, Y. H., Lam, T. J. G. M., Galligan, D. T., Beiboer, M. L., and Brand, A. (1997), ”Estimation of Interdependence Among Quarters of the Bovine Udder With Subclinical Mastitis and Implications for Analysis,” Journal of Dairy Science, 80, 1592–1599. · doi:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)76089-2
[3] Bellamy, S. L., Li, Y., Ryan, L. M., Lipsitz, S., Canner, M. J., and Wright, R. (2004), ”Analysis of Clustered and Interval Censored Data From a Community-Based Study in Asthma,” Statistics in Medicine, 23, 3607–3621. · doi:10.1002/sim.1918
[4] Collet, D. (1994), Modelling Survival Data in Medical Research, London: Chapman & Hall.
[5] Finkelstein, D. M. (1986), ”A Proportional Hazards Model for Interval-Censored Failure Time Data,” Biometrics, 42, 845–854. · Zbl 0618.62097 · doi:10.2307/2530698
[6] Izumi, S., and Ohtaki, N. (2004), ”Aspects of the Armitage–Doll Gamma Frailty Model for Cancer Incidence Data,” Environmetrics, 15, 209–218. · doi:10.1002/env.635
[7] Klein, J. P., and Moeschberger, M. L. (2003), Survival Analysis: Techniques for Censored and Truncated Data, New York: Springer. · Zbl 1011.62106
[8] Laevens, H., Deluyker, H., Schukken, Y. H., De Meulemeester, L., Vandermeersch, R., De Muêlenaere, E., and De Kruif, A. (1997), ”Influence of Parity and Stage of Lactation on the Somatic Cell Count in Bacteriologically Negative Dairy Cows,” Journal of Dairy Science, 80, 3219–3226. · doi:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)76295-7
[9] Legrand, C., Ducrocq, V., Janssen, P., Sylvester, R., and Duchateau, L. (2005), ”A Bayesian Approach to Jointly Estimate Centre and Treatment by Centre Heterogeneity in a Proportional Hazards Model,” Statistics in Medicine, 24, 3789–3804. · doi:10.1002/sim.2475
[10] Neijenhuis, F., Barkema, H. W., Hogeveen, H., and Noordhuizen, J. P. T. M. (2001), ”Relationship Between Teat-End Callosity and Occurrence of Clinical Mastitis,” Journal of Dairy Science, 84, 2664–2672. · doi:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(01)74720-0
[11] Oakes, D. (1989), ”Bivariate Survival Models Induced by Frailties,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 84, 487–493. · Zbl 0677.62094 · doi:10.1080/01621459.1989.10478795
[12] Radke, B. R. (2003), ”A Demonstration of Interval-Censored Survival Analysis,” Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 59, 241–256. · doi:10.1016/S0167-5877(03)00103-X
[13] Rondeau, V., Commenges, D., and Joly, P. (2003), ”Maximum Penalized Likelihood Estimation in a Gamma-Frailty Model,” Lifetime Data Analysis, 9, 139–153. · Zbl 1116.62408 · doi:10.1023/A:1022978802021
[14] Schepers, A. J., Lam, T. J. G. M., Schukken, Y. H., Wilmink, J. B. M., and Hanekamp, W. J. A. (1997), ”Estimation of Variance Components for Somatic Cell Counts to Determine Thresholds for Uninfected Quarters,” Journal of Dairy Science, 80, 1833–1840. · doi:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)76118-6
[15] Seegers, H., Fourichon, C., and Beaudeau, F. (2003), ”Production Effects Related to Mastitis and Mastitis Economics in Dairy Cattle Herds,” Veterinary Research, 34, 475–491. · doi:10.1051/vetres:2003027
[16] Therneau, T. M., and Grambsch, P. M. (2000), Modeling Survival Data: Extending the Cox Model, New York: Springer. · Zbl 0958.62094
[17] Turnbull, B. W. (1976), ”Empirical Distribution Function With Arbitrarily Grouped, Censored and Truncated Data,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Ser. B, 38, 290–295. · Zbl 0343.62033
[18] Vecht, U., Wisselink, H. J., and Defize, P. R. (1989), ”Dutch National Mastitis Survey–the Effect of Herd and Animal Factors on Somatic-Cell Count,” Netherlands Milk and Dairy Journal, 43, 425–435.
[19] Weller, J. I., Saran, A., and Zeliger, Y. (1992), ”Genetic and Environmental Relationships Among Somatic-Cell Count, Bacterial Infection, and Clinical Mastitis,” Journal of Dairy Science, 75, 2532–2540. · doi:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(92)78015-1
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.