×

Inferential conditionals and evidentiality. (English) Zbl 1305.03010

Summary: Many conditionals seem to convey the existence of a link between their antecedent and consequent. We draw on a recently proposed typology of conditionals to argue for an old philosophical idea according to which the link is inferential in nature. We show that the proposal has explanatory force by presenting empirical results on the evidential meaning of certain English and Dutch modal expressions.

MSC:

03A05 Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations
03B65 Logic of natural languages
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Adams, E. W. (1965). The logic of conditionals. Inquiry, 8, 166-197. · doi:10.1080/00201746508601430
[2] Aikhenvald, A. Y. (2004). Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[3] Aksu-Koç, A. (1988). The acquisition of aspect and modality: The case of past reference in Turkish. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. · doi:10.1017/CBO9780511554353
[4] Anderson, LB; Chafe, WL (ed.); Nichols, J. (ed.), Evidentials, paths of change and mental maps: Typologically regular asymmetries, 273-312 (1986), Norwood, NJ
[5] Bennett, J. (2003). A philosophical guide to conditionals. Oxford: Oxford University Press. · doi:10.1093/0199258872.001.0001
[6] Cialdea Mayer, M., & Pirri, F. (1993). First order abduction via tableau and sequent calculi. Logic Journal of IGPL, 1, 99-117. · Zbl 0807.03005 · doi:10.1093/jigpal/1.1.99
[7] Cialdea Mayer, M., & Pirri, F. (1995). Propositional abduction in modal logic. Logic Journal of IGPL, 3, 907-919. · Zbl 0847.03010 · doi:10.1093/jigpal/3.6.907
[8] Dancygier, B. (1998). Conditionals and predictions: Time, knowledge and causation in conditional constructions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[9] Dancygier, B. (2003). Classyfying conditionals: Form and function. English Language and Linguistics, 7, 309-323. · doi:10.1017/S1360674303001126
[10] Dancygier, B., & Sweetser, E. (2005). Mental spaces in grammar: Conditional constructions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. · doi:10.1017/CBO9780511486760
[11] de Haan, F. (1999). Evidentiality and epistemic modality: Setting boundaries. Southwest Journal of Linguistics, 18(1), 83-101.
[12] Declerck, R., & Reed, S. (2001). Conditionals: A comprehensive empirical analysis. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. · doi:10.1515/9783110851748
[13] Dietz, R. (2008). Epistemic modals and correct disagreement. In M. García-Carpintero & M. Kölbel (Eds.), Relative truth (pp. 239-262). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[14] Diewald, G.; Smirnova, E.; Diewald, G. (ed.); Smirnova, E. (ed.), Introduction. Evidentiality in European languages: The lexical-grammatical distinction, 1-14 (2010), Berlin/New York
[15] Douven, I.; Horsten, L. (ed.); Pettigrew, R. (ed.), Indicative conditionals, 383-405 (2011), London
[16] Douven, I. (2013). Inference to the best explanation, Dutch books, and inaccuracy minimisation. Philosophical Quarterly, 69(252), 428-444. · doi:10.1111/1467-9213.12032
[17] Douven, I., & Meijs, W. (2006). Bootstrap confirmation made quantitative. Synthese, 149(1), 97-132. · Zbl 1103.03301 · doi:10.1007/s11229-004-6250-2
[18] Douven, I., & Verbrugge, S. (2010). The Adams family. Cognition, 117, 302-318. · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.08.015
[19] Edgington, D. (1995). On conditionals. Mind, 104(414), 235-329. · doi:10.1093/mind/104.414.235
[20] Faller, M. (2002). Semantics and pragmatics of evidentials in Cuzco Quechua. PhD thesis, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.
[21] Gabbay, D. M., & Woods, J. (2005). The reach of abduction. Amsterdam: Elsevier. · Zbl 1078.03002
[22] Glymour, C. (1980). Theory and evidence. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
[23] Groenendijk, J. A., & Stokhof, M. J. (1975). Modality and conversational information. Theoretical Linguistics, 2, 61-112. · doi:10.1515/thli.1975.2.1-3.61
[24] Haegeman, L. (2003). Conditional clauses: External and internal syntax. Mind & Language, 18(4), 317-339. · doi:10.1111/1468-0017.00230
[25] Haßler, G.; Diewald, G. (ed.); Smirnova, E. (ed.), Epistemic modality and evidentiality and their determination on a deictic basis: The case of Romance languages, 223-248 (2010), Berlin/New York
[26] Huitink, J. (2008). Modals, conditionals, and compositionality. PhD thesis, Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen.
[27] Karttunen, L.; Kimball, J. (ed.), “Possible” and “Must”, No. 1, 1-20 (1972), New York
[28] Kratzer, A.; Stechow, A. (ed.); Wunderlich, D. (ed.), Modality, 38-74 (1991), Berlin
[29] Krzyżanowska, K.; Stalmaszczyk, P. (ed.), Ambiguous conditionals, 315-332 (2012), Frankfurt
[30] Krzyżanowska, K., Wenmackers, S., & Douven, I. (2013). Rethinking Gibbard’s riverboat argument. Forthcoming in Studia Logica. · Zbl 1359.03007
[31] Kwon, I. (2012). Please confirm what I inferred: On the Korean inferential-evidential marker -napo-. Journal of Pragmatics, 44, 958-969.
[32] Kyburg, H., & Teng, C. M. (2001). Uncertain inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. · Zbl 1023.03002 · doi:10.1017/CBO9780511612947
[33] Levinson, S. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. · Zbl 0507.28010
[34] Matthewson, L.; Davis, H.; Rullmann, H.; Craenenbroeck, J. (ed.); Rooryck, J. (ed.), Evidentials as epistemic modals: Evidence from St’át’imcets, No. 7, 201-254 (2007), Amsterdam
[35] Mortelmans, T. (2012). Epistemic MUST and its cognates in German and Dutch. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(15), 2150-2164. · doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2012.09.011
[36] Nuyts, J., & Vonk, W. (1999). Epistemic modality and focus in Dutch. Linguistics, 37(4), 699-737. · doi:10.1515/ling.37.4.699
[37] Papafragou, A. (1998). Inference and word meaning: The case of modal auxiliaries. Lingua, 105, 1-47. · doi:10.1016/S0024-3841(97)00029-6
[38] Salmon, W. (2011). Conventional implicature, presupposition, and the meaning of must. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 3416-3430.
[39] Sanford, D. H. (1989). If P, Then Q: Conditionals and the foundations of reasoning. London: Routledge.
[40] Smirnova, A. (2012). Evidentiality in Bulgarian: Temporality, epistemic modality, and information source. Journal of Semantics,. doi:10.1093/jos/ffs017. · doi:10.1093/jos/ffs017
[41] van der Auwera, J., & Plungian, V. (1998). Modality’s semantic map. Linguistic Typology, 2, 79-124.
[42] Veltman, F. (1985). Logics for conditionals. PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam.
[43] Verbrugge, S. (2007). A psycholinguistic Analysis of inferential conditional sentences. PhD thesis, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.
[44] von Fintel, K., & Gillies, A. (2007). An opinionated guide to epistemic modality. Oxford Studies in Epistemology, 2, 32-63.
[45] von Fintel, K., & Gillies, A. S. (2010). Must...stay...strong!. Natural Language Semantics, 18(4), 351-383.
[46] Willett, T. (1988). A cross-linguistic survey of the grammaticization of evidentiality. Studies in Language, 12(1), 51-97. · doi:10.1075/sl.12.1.04wil
[47] Woods, M. (2003). Conditionals. Oxford: Oxford University Press. · Zbl 1021.03503
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.