The ABJM model is a higher Gauge theory. (English) Zbl 1303.81178
Summary: M2-branes couple to a 3-form potential, which suggests that their description involves a non-abelian 2-gerbe or, equivalently, a principal 3-bundle. We show that current M2-brane models fit this expectation: they can be reformulated as higher gauge theories on such categorified bundles. We thus add to the still very sparse list of physically interesting higher gauge theories.
MSC:
81T30 | String and superstring theories; other extended objects (e.g., branes) in quantum field theory |
81T10 | Model quantum field theories |
81T13 | Yang-Mills and other gauge theories in quantum field theory |
14D21 | Applications of vector bundles and moduli spaces in mathematical physics (twistor theory, instantons, quantum field theory) |
References:
[1] | DOI: 10.1090/conm/431/08264 · doi:10.1090/conm/431/08264 |
[2] | DOI: 10.1007/s10714-010-1070-9 · Zbl 1225.83001 · doi:10.1007/s10714-010-1070-9 |
[3] | DOI: 10.1007/s00220-011-1257-2 · Zbl 1300.81064 · doi:10.1007/s00220-011-1257-2 |
[4] | Saemann C., J. High Energy Phys. 1110 pp 008– (2011) |
[5] | DOI: 10.1007/JHEP07(2012)010 · Zbl 1397.81165 · doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2012)010 |
[6] | DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.77.065008 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.77.065008 |
[7] | DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2008.11.014 · Zbl 1194.81205 · doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2008.11.014 |
[8] | DOI: 10.1088/1126-6708/2008/10/091 · Zbl 1245.81130 · doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/10/091 |
[9] | DOI: 10.1007/JHEP12(2011)062 · Zbl 1306.81275 · doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2011)062 |
[10] | DOI: 10.1063/1.4832395 · Zbl 1303.81192 · doi:10.1063/1.4832395 |
[11] | DOI: 10.4310/ATMP.2011.v15.n4.a4 · Zbl 1296.81062 · doi:10.4310/ATMP.2011.v15.n4.a4 |
[12] | DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.79.025002 · Zbl 1222.81264 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.79.025002 |
[13] | DOI: 10.1007/s00220-009-0760-1 · Zbl 1259.81081 · doi:10.1007/s00220-009-0760-1 |
[14] | Roberts D. M., J. Homotopy Relat. Struct. 3 pp 193– (2008) |
[15] | DOI: 10.1016/0022-4049(84)90034-3 · Zbl 0554.20014 · doi:10.1016/0022-4049(84)90034-3 |
[16] | DOI: 10.1016/j.difgeo.2010.10.002 · Zbl 1217.53049 · doi:10.1016/j.difgeo.2010.10.002 |
[17] | DOI: 10.1088/1126-6708/2008/11/043 · doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/11/043 |
[18] | DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.79.086002 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.79.086002 |
[19] | DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2009.08.012 · Zbl 1203.81145 · doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2009.08.012 |
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.