An experimental investigation of intrinsic motivations for giving. (English) Zbl 1287.91035
Summary: This paper presents results from a modified dictator experiment aimed at distinguishing and quantifying intrinsic motivations for giving. We employ an experimental design with three treatments that vary the recipient (experimenter, charity) and amount passed (fixed, varying). We find giving to the experimenter not to be significantly different from giving to a charity, when the amount the subject donates crowds out the amount donated by the experimenter such that the charity always receives a fixed amount. This result suggests that the latter treatment, first used by H. Crumpler and P. J. Grossman [“An experimental test of warm glow giving”, J. Public Econ. 92, No. 5–6, 1011–1021 (2008; doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.12.014)], does not provide a clean test of warm glow motivation. We then propose a new method of detecting warm glow motivation based on the idea that in a random-lottery incentive (RLI) scheme, such as the one we employ, warm glow accumulates and this may lead to satiation, whereas purely altruistic motivation does not. We also provide bounds on the magnitudes of warm glow and pure altruism as motives that drive giving in our experiment.
MSC:
| 91A90 | Experimental studies |
Keywords:
dictator game; warm glow; pure altruism; charitable giving; random lottery incentive schemeReferences:
| [1] | Andreoni, J. (1989). Giving with impure altruism: Applications to charity and ricardian equivalence. Journal of Political Economy, 97(6), 1447-1458. |
| [2] | Andreoni, J. (1990). Impure altruism and donations to public goods: A theory of warm-glow giving. Economic Journal, 100(401), 464-477. |
| [3] | Andreoni, J.; Kolm, S-C (ed.); Mercier Ythier, J. (ed.), Philanthropy (2006), North Holland |
| [4] | Andreoni, J., & Bernheim, B. D. (2009). Social image and the 50-50 norm: A theoretical and experimental analysis of audience effects. Econometrica, 77(5), 1607-1636. · Zbl 1178.91042 · doi:10.3982/ECTA7384 |
| [5] | Andreoni, J., & Payne, A. A. (2011). Is crowding out due entirely to fundraising? Evidence from a panel of charities. Journal of Public Economics, 95, 334-343. · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.11.011 |
| [6] | Bardsley, N., Cubitt, R., Loomes, G., Moffatt, P., Starmer, C., & Sugden, R. (2010). Experimental economics: Rethinking the rules. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. |
| [7] | Becker, G. S. (1974). A theory of social interactions. Journal of Political Economy, 82, 1063-1093. |
| [8] | Benabou, R., & Tirole, J. (2006). Incentives and prosocial behaviour. American Economic Review, 96(5), 1652-1678. · doi:10.1257/aer.96.5.1652 |
| [9] | Crumpler, H., & Grossman, P. (2008). An experimental test of warm glow giving. Journal of Public Economics, 92(5-6), 1011-1021. |
| [10] | Cubitt, R. P., Starmer, R., & Sugden, R. (1998). On the validity of the random lottery incentive system. Experimental Economics, 1, 115-131. · Zbl 0928.91016 |
| [11] | Eckel, C. C., & Grossman, P. J. (1996). Altruism in Anonymous Dictator Games. Games and economic behavior, 16, 181-191. · Zbl 0866.90144 · doi:10.1006/game.1996.0081 |
| [12] | Eckel, C. C., Grossman, P. J., & Johnston, R. (2005). An experimental test of the crowding out hypothesis. Journal of Public Economics, 89(8), 1543-1560. · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.05.012 |
| [13] | Ellingsen, T., & Johannesson, M. (2008). Pride and prejudice: The human side of incentive theory. American Economic Review, 98(3), 990-1008. · doi:10.1257/aer.98.3.990 |
| [14] | Ellingsen, T., & Johannesson, M. (2011). Conspicuous generosity. Journal of Public Economics, 95(9-10), 1131-1143. · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.05.002 |
| [15] | Fehr, E., & Gachter, S. (2000). Fairness and retaliation: The economics of reciprocity. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(3), 159-181. · doi:10.1257/jep.14.3.159 |
| [16] | Goeree, J. K., Holt, C. A., & Laury, S. K. (2002). Private costs and public benefits: Unraveling the effects of altruism and noisy behavior. Journal of Public Economics, 83, 255-276. · doi:10.1016/S0047-2727(00)00160-2 |
| [17] | Grossman, Z. (2010). Self-signaling versus social signaling in giving. UCSB Working paper. |
| [18] | Harrison, G. W., & Johnson, L. T. (2006). Identifying altruism in the laboratory. In D. Davis & R. M. Isaac (Eds.), Experiments in fundraising and charitable contributions (Research in Experimental Economics, Vol. 11). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. |
| [19] | Ledyard, J.; Kagel, J. (ed.); Roth, A. (ed.), Public goods experiments (1995), Princeton, NJ |
| [20] | Manski, C. (2007). Identification for prediction and decision. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. |
| [21] | Palfrey, T. R., & Prisbrey, J. E. (1997). Anomalous behavior in public goods experiments: How much and why? American Economic Review, 87, 829-846. |
| [22] | Rabin, M. (1993). Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics. American Economic Review, 83(5), 1281-1302. |
| [23] | Reinstein, D. (2010). Substitution among charitable contributions: An experimental study. Unpublished manuscript. |
| [24] | Tonin, M., & Vlassopoulos, M. (2010). Disentangling the sources of prosocially motivated effort: A field experiment. Journal of Public Economics, 94(11-12), 1086-1092. · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.08.011 |
| [25] | Tonin, M., & Vlassopoulos, M. (2013). Experimental evidence of self-image concerns as motivation for giving. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization (forth coming). |
| [26] | Vesterlund, L.; Steinberg, R. (ed.); Powell, WW (ed.), Why do people give? (2006), Haven, CT |
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.
