×

The structural physical approximations and optimal entanglement witnesses. (English) Zbl 1278.81028

Summary: We introduce the notions of positive and copositive types for entanglement witnesses, depending on the distance to the positive part and copositive part. An entanglement witness \(W\) is of positive type if and only if its partial transpose \(W^{\Gamma}\) is of copositive type. We show that if the structural physical approximation (SPA) of \(W\) is separable, then \(W\) should be of copositive type, and the SPA of \(W^{\Gamma}\) is never separable unless W is of both positive and copositive types. This shows that the SPA conjecture is meaningful only for those of copositive type. We provide examples to show that the SPA conjecture fails even for the case of copositive types.{
©2012 American Institute of Physics}

MSC:

81P40 Quantum coherence, entanglement, quantum correlations

References:

[1] DOI: 10.1088/1751-8113/44/18/185308 · Zbl 1215.81011 · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/44/18/185308
[2] DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.84.052323 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.84.052323
[3] DOI: 10.1016/0024-3795(92)90260-H · Zbl 0763.15003 · doi:10.1016/0024-3795(92)90260-H
[4] DOI: 10.1016/0024-3795(75)90075-0 · Zbl 0327.15018 · doi:10.1016/0024-3795(75)90075-0
[5] Choi M.-D., Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics 38 pp 583– (1982)
[6] DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.82.052310 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.82.052310
[7] DOI: 10.1088/1751-8113/44/16/165304 · Zbl 1214.81036 · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/44/16/165304
[8] DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.80.062314 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.80.062314
[9] DOI: 10.1142/S1230161211000261 · Zbl 1243.81036 · doi:10.1142/S1230161211000261
[10] Eom M.-H., Math. Scand. 86 pp 130– (2000)
[11] DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.66.052315 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.66.052315
[12] DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.84.024302 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.84.024302
[13] DOI: 10.1142/S1230161211000224 · Zbl 1243.81038 · doi:10.1142/S1230161211000224
[14] DOI: 10.1142/S1230161212500096 · Zbl 1251.81009 · doi:10.1142/S1230161212500096
[15] DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.86.034301 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.86.034301
[16] DOI: 10.1016/S0375-9601(96)00706-2 · Zbl 1037.81501 · doi:10.1016/S0375-9601(96)00706-2
[17] DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.68.052101 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.68.052101
[18] DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.127902 · Zbl 1267.81038 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.127902
[19] DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.81.865 · Zbl 1205.81012 · doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.81.865
[20] DOI: 10.1016/0034-4877(74)90044-5 · Zbl 0348.60108 · doi:10.1016/0034-4877(74)90044-5
[21] DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.78.062105 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.78.062105
[22] DOI: 10.1063/1.4712302 · Zbl 1275.81016 · doi:10.1063/1.4712302
[23] DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.62.052310 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.62.052310
[24] DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.160401 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.160401
[25] DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.83.020301 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.83.020301
[26] DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.1413 · Zbl 0947.81003 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.1413
[27] DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.85.022334 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.85.022334
[28] DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.63.050301 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.63.050301
[29] DOI: 10.1016/j.laa.2011.01.019 · Zbl 1221.15047 · doi:10.1016/j.laa.2011.01.019
[30] Størmer E., Münster J. Math. 2 pp 299– (2009)
[31] DOI: 10.1016/S0375-9601(00)00401-1 · Zbl 1115.81320 · doi:10.1016/S0375-9601(00)00401-1
[32] DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.61.040301 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.61.040301
[33] DOI: 10.1007/BF01162009 · Zbl 0511.46050 · doi:10.1007/BF01162009
[34] DOI: 10.1016/0024-3795(85)90074-6 · Zbl 0645.46042 · doi:10.1016/0024-3795(85)90074-6
[35] DOI: 10.1090/conm/062 · Zbl 0602.00004 · doi:10.1090/conm/062
[36] DOI: 10.1016/0034-4877(76)90038-0 · Zbl 0347.46063 · doi:10.1016/0034-4877(76)90038-0
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.