×

On the convergence rate of random permutation sampler and ECR algorithm in missing data models. (English) Zbl 1277.65007

Let \(x\) be the observed data, \(z=(z_1,\dots,z_n)\in \mathbb Z^n\), \(z_i\in(1,\dots,k)\) be the missing data, \(\eta=(\eta_1,\dots,\eta_k)\) be unknown parameters. The authors consider models with likelihoods of the form \[ f(x|\eta)=\sum_{z\in Z}f(x,z|\eta), \] where \(f(x,z|\eta)\) is a complete likelihood with the property that for any permutation \((t_1,\dots,t_k)\) of \((1,\dots,k)\) \[ f(x,(t_{z_1},\dots,t_{z_n})|\eta)=f(x,z|(\eta_{t_1},\dots,\eta_{t_k}). \] (Finite mixture models can be considered as an example). The prior distribution of \(\eta\) is assumed to be permutation invariant. In this case, the model exhibits a symmetric likelihood and symmetric posterior distribution.
The authors propose a modification of the Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm for sampling from the posterior which is based on the splitting of \(\mathbb Z^n\) into \(k!\) classes of equivalence with respect to symmetry and sampling for only one representative from each class with random permutation of the result.
It is shown that the convergence rate of this equivalence classes representatives (ECR) algorithm is as good as the convergence of the random permutation sampler and not worse than the one of the original MCMC.

MSC:

65C40 Numerical analysis or methods applied to Markov chains
60J05 Discrete-time Markov processes on general state spaces
65C05 Monte Carlo methods
60J22 Computational methods in Markov chains
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Bremaud P (1999) Markov Chains: Gibbs fields, Monte Carlo simulation, and queues. Springer, New York · Zbl 0949.60009
[2] Cappé O, Moulines E, Rydén T (2005) Hidden Markov models. Springer, New York · Zbl 1080.62065
[3] Celeux G, Hurn M, Robert CP (2000) Computational and inferential difficulties with mixture posterior distributions. J Am Stat Assoc 95:957-970 · Zbl 0999.62020 · doi:10.1080/01621459.2000.10474285
[4] Dempster A, Laird N, Rubin D (1977) Maximum Likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm (with discussion). J R Stat Soc, Ser B 39:1-38 · Zbl 0364.62022
[5] Frühwirth-Schnatter S (2001) Markov chain Monte Carlo estimation of classical and dynamic switching and mixture models. J Am Stat Assoc 56:363-375 · Zbl 1015.62022
[6] Frühwirth-Schnatter S (2006) Finite mixture and Markov switching models. Springer, New York · Zbl 1108.62002
[7] Gelfand A, Smith A (1990) Sampling based approaches to calculating marginal densities. J Am Stat Assoc 85:398-409 · Zbl 0702.62020 · doi:10.1080/01621459.1990.10476213
[8] Jasra A, Holmes CC, Stephens DA (2005) Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods and the label switching problem in Bayesian mixture modelling. Stat Sci 20:50-67 · Zbl 1100.62032 · doi:10.1214/088342305000000016
[9] Marin, JM; Mengersen, K.; Robert, CP; Dey, D. (ed.); Rao, CR (ed.), Bayesian modelling and inference on mixtures of distributions (2005), Amsterdam
[10] Papastamoulis P, Iliopoulos G (2010) An artificial allocations based solution to the label switching problem in Bayesian analysis of mixtures of distributions. J Comput Graph Stat 19:313-331 · doi:10.1198/jcgs.2010.09008
[11] Redner RA, Walker HF (1984) Mixture densities, maximum likelihood and the EM algorithm. SIAM Rev 26:195-239 · Zbl 0536.62021 · doi:10.1137/1026034
[12] Richardson S, Green PJ (1997) On Bayesian analysis of mixtures with an unknown number of components (with discussion). J R Stat Soc, Ser B 59:731-792 · Zbl 0891.62020 · doi:10.1111/1467-9868.00095
[13] Robert CP, Rydén T, Titterington DM (2000) Bayesian inference in hidden Markov models through the reversible jump Markov Chain Monte Carlo method. J R Stat Soc, Ser B 62:57-75 · Zbl 0941.62090 · doi:10.1111/1467-9868.00219
[14] Sperrin M, Jaki T, Wit E (2010) Probabilistic relabelling strategies for the label switching problem in Bayesian mixture models. Stat Comput 20:357-366 · doi:10.1007/s11222-009-9129-8
[15] Stephens M (1997) Bayesian methods for mixtures of normal distributions. D. Phil dissertation, Department of Statistics, University of Oxford · Zbl 0536.62021
[16] Stephens M (2000) Dealing with label switching in mixture models. J R Stat Soc, Ser B 62:795-809 · Zbl 0957.62020 · doi:10.1111/1467-9868.00265
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.