×

An intensity-based approach for equity modeling. (English) Zbl 1274.91466

Summary: This paper analyzes an intensity-based approach for equity modeling. We use the Cox-Ingersoll-Ross (CIR) process to describe the intensity of the firm’s default process. The intensity is purposely linked to the assets of the firm and consequently is also used to explain the equity. We examine two different approaches to link assets and intensity and derive closed-form expressions for the firms’ equity under both models. We use the Kalman filter to estimate the parameters of the unobservable intensity process. We demonstrate our approach using historical equity time series data from Merrill Lynch.

MSC:

91G50 Corporate finance (dividends, real options, etc.)
91B84 Economic time series analysis
93E11 Filtering in stochastic control theory
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Black, The pricing of options and corporate liabilities, Journal of Political Economy 81 (3) pp 637– (1973) · Zbl 1092.91524 · doi:10.1086/260062
[2] Heston, A closed-form solution for options with stochastic volatility with applications to bond and currency options, The Review of Financial Studies 6 (2) pp 327– (1993) · Zbl 1126.91368 · doi:10.1093/rfs/6.2.327
[3] Derman E Kani I The volatility smile and its impliead tree 1994
[4] Merton, Option pricing when underlying stock returns are discountinuous, Journal of Financial Economics 3 pp 125– (1976) · Zbl 1131.91344 · doi:10.1016/0304-405X(76)90022-2
[5] Merton, On the pricing of corporate debt: the risk structure of interest rates, Journal of Finance 29 (2) pp 449– (1974) · doi:10.2307/2978814
[6] Black, Valuing corporate securities: some effects of bond indenture provisions, Journal of Finance 31 (2) pp 351– (1976) · doi:10.2307/2326607
[7] Finkelstein V Pan G Lardy J Ta T Tierney J CreditGrades Technical Document 2001
[8] Lyden S Saraniti D An empirical examination of the classical theory of corporate security valuation 2001
[9] Jarrow R Protter P Structural versus reduced form models: a new information based perspective 2004 · Zbl 1268.01017
[10] Jarrow, Credit risk: drawing the analogy, Risk Magazine 5 (9) pp 51– (1992)
[11] Bremaud, Point Processes and Queues: Martingale Dynamics pp 354– (1981) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-9477-8
[12] Duffie, Recursive valuation of defaultable securities and the timing of resolution of uncertainty, The Annals of Applied Probability 6 (4) pp 1075– (1996) · Zbl 0868.90008 · doi:10.1214/aoap/1035463324
[13] Cox, A theory of the term structure of interest rates, Econometrica 53 (2) pp 385– (1985) · Zbl 1274.91447 · doi:10.2307/1911242
[14] Duffie, Transform analysis and asset pricing for affine jump-diffusions, Econometrica 68 (6) pp 1343– (2000) · Zbl 1055.91524 · doi:10.1111/1468-0262.00164
[15] Duffie, Affine processes and applications in finance, Annals of Applied Probability 13 pp 984– (2003) · Zbl 1048.60059 · doi:10.1214/aoap/1060202833
[16] Lando, On Cox processes and credit risky securities, Review of Derivatives Research 2 pp 99– (1998) · Zbl 1274.91459 · doi:10.1007/BF01531332
[17] Buettler, Pricing callable bonds by means of Green’s function, Mathematical Finance 6 (1) pp 53– (1996) · Zbl 0919.90006 · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9965.1996.tb00112.x
[18] Geyer, A state-space approach to estimate and test multifactor Cox-Ingersoll-Ross models of the term structure, Journal of Financial Research 22 (1) pp 107– (1999) · doi:10.1111/j.1475-6803.1999.tb00717.x
[19] Massey, The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for goodness of fit, Journal of the American Statistical Association 46 (253) pp 68– (1951) · Zbl 0042.14403 · doi:10.2307/2280095
[20] Vasicek, An equilibrium characterization of the term structure, Journal of Financial Economics 5 (2) pp 177– (1977) · Zbl 1372.91113 · doi:10.1016/0304-405X(77)90016-2
[21] Hull, Pricing interest-rate derivative securities, The Review of Financial Studies 3 (4) pp 573– (1990) · Zbl 1386.91152 · doi:10.1093/rfs/3.4.573
[22] Brigo, Credit Default Swap calibration and derivatives pricing with the SSRD stochastic intensity model, Finance and Stochastic 9 pp 29– (2005) · Zbl 1065.60085 · doi:10.1007/s00780-004-0131-x
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.