×

Optimal conditional error functions for the control of conditional power. (English) Zbl 1274.62729

Summary: Ethical considerations and the competitive environment of clinical trials usually require that any given trial have sufficient power to detect a treatment advance. If at an interim analysis the available data are used to decide whether the trial is promising enough to be continued, investigators and sponsors often wish to have a high conditional power, which is the probability to reject the null hypothesis given the interim data and the alternative of interest. Under this requirement a design with interim sample size recalculation, which keeps the overall and conditional power at a prespecified value and preserves the overall type I error rate, is a reasonable alternative to a classical group sequential design, in which the conditional power is often too small. In this article two-stage designs with control of overall and conditional power are constructed that minimize the expected sample size, either for a simple point alternative or for a random mixture of alternatives given by a prior density for the efficacy parameter. The presented optimality result applies to trials with and without an interim hypothesis test; in addition, one can account for constraints such as a minimal sample size for the second stage. The optimal designs will be illustrated with an example, and will be compared to the frequently considered method of using the conditional type I error level of a group sequential design.

MSC:

62P10 Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis

Software:

Mathematica
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Andersen, Conditional power calculations as an aid in the decision whether to continue a clinical trial, Controlled Clinical Trials 8, pp 67– (1987) · doi:10.1016/0197-2456(87)90027-4
[2] Barber, Optimal asymmetric one-sided group sequential tests, Biometrika 89, pp 49– (2001) · Zbl 0998.62067 · doi:10.1093/biomet/89.1.49
[3] Bauer, Multistage testing with adaptive designs (with discussion), Biometrie und Informatik in Medizin und Biologie 20, pp 130– (1989)
[4] Bauer, Evaluation of experiments with adaptive interim analyses, Biometrics 50, pp 1029– (1994) · Zbl 0825.62789 · doi:10.2307/2533441
[5] Cui, Modification of sample size in group sequential clinical trials, Biometrics 55, pp 321– (1999) · Zbl 1059.62636
[6] Denne, Sample size recalculation using conditional power, Statistics in Medicine 20, pp 2645– (2001) · doi:10.1002/sim.734
[7] Halperin, An aid to data monitoring on long-term clinical trials, Controlled Clinical Trials 3, pp 311– (1982) · doi:10.1016/0197-2456(82)90022-8
[8] Hartung, A new class of completely self-designing clinical trials, Biometrical Journal 45, pp 3– (2003) · doi:10.1002/bimj.200290014
[9] Kieser, A bootstrap procedure for adaptive selection of the test statistic in flexible two-stage designs, Biometrical Journal 44, pp 641– (2002) · doi:10.1002/1521-4036(200207)44:5<641::AID-BIMJ641>3.0.CO;2-X
[10] Lan, Estimation of parameters and sample size reestimation, Proceedings of Biopharmaceutical Section, American Statistical Association pp 48– (1997)
[11] Lan, Stochastically curtailed tests in long term clinical trials, Communications in Statistics-Sequential Analysis 1, pp 207– (1982) · Zbl 0501.62078 · doi:10.1080/07474948208836014
[12] Lang, Trend tests with adaptive scoring, Biometrical Journal 42, pp 1007– (2000) · Zbl 1039.62012 · doi:10.1002/1521-4036(200012)42:8<1007::AID-BIMJ1007>3.0.CO;2-J
[13] Lehmacher, Adaptive sample size calculations in group sequential trials, Biometrics 55, pp 1286– (1999) · Zbl 1059.62671 · doi:10.1111/j.0006-341X.1999.01286.x
[14] Liu, The attractiveness of the concept of a prospectively designed two-stage clinical trial, Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics 9, pp 537– (1999) · Zbl 1056.62538 · doi:10.1081/BIP-100101194
[15] Liu, On sample size and inference for two-stage adaptive designs, Biometrics 57, pp 172– (2001) · Zbl 1209.62179 · doi:10.1111/j.0006-341X.2001.00172.x
[16] Müller, Adaptive group sequential designs for clinical trials: Combining the advantages of adaptive and of classical group sequential approaches, Biometrics 57, pp 886– (2001) · Zbl 1209.62180 · doi:10.1111/j.0006-341X.2001.00886.x
[17] Neuhäuser, An adaptive location-scale test, Biometrical Journal 43, pp 809– (2001) · Zbl 1013.62052 · doi:10.1002/1521-4036(200111)43:7<809::AID-BIMJ809>3.0.CO;2-S
[18] O’Brien, A multiple testing procedure for clinical trials, Biometrics 5, pp 549– (1979) · doi:10.2307/2530245
[19] Pocock, Group sequential methods in the design and analysis of clinical trials, Biometrika 64, pp 191– (1977) · doi:10.1093/biomet/64.2.191
[20] Posch, Adaptive two stage designs and the conditional error function, Biometrical Journal 41, pp 689– (1999) · Zbl 0943.62077 · doi:10.1002/(SICI)1521-4036(199910)41:6<689::AID-BIMJ689>3.0.CO;2-P
[21] Posch, Interim analysis and sample size reassessment, Biometrics 56, pp 1170– (2000) · Zbl 1060.62653 · doi:10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.01170.x
[22] Posch, Issues on flexible designs, Statistics in Medicine 22, pp 953– (2003) · doi:10.1002/sim.1455
[23] Proschan, Designed extension of studies based on conditional power, Biometrics 51, pp 1315– (1995) · Zbl 0875.62506 · doi:10.2307/2533262
[24] Thach, Self-designing two stage trials to minimize expected costs, Biometrics 58, pp 432– (2002) · Zbl 1210.62108 · doi:10.1111/j.0006-341X.2002.00432.x
[25] Wang, Approximately optimal one-parameter boundaries for group sequential trials, Biometrics 43, pp 193– (1987) · Zbl 0609.62120 · doi:10.2307/2531959
[26] Wassmer, Statistische Testverfahren für gruppensequentielle und adaptive Pläne in klinischen Studien (1999)
[27] Wolfram, The Mathematica Book (1996)
[28] Zeymer, The Na+/H+ exchange inhibitor eniporide as an adjunct to early reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction, Journal of the American College of Cardiology 38, pp 1644– (2001) · doi:10.1016/S0735-1097(01)01608-4
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.