×

On the swap-distances of different realizations of a graphical degree sequence. (English) Zbl 1263.05016

Summary: One of the first graph-theoretical problems to be given serious attention (in the 1950s) was the decision whether a given integer sequence is equal to the degree sequence of a simple graph (or graphical, for short). One method to solve this problem is the greedy algorithm of Havel and Hakimi, which is based on the swap operation.
Another, closely related question is to find a sequence of swap operations to transform one graphical realization into another of the same degree sequence. This latter problem has received particular attention in the context of rapidly mixing Markov chain approaches to uniform sampling of all possible realizations of a given degree sequence. (This becomes a matter of interest in the context of the study of large social networks, for example.) Previously there were only crude upper bounds on the shortest possible length of such swap sequences between two realizations.
In this paper we develop formulae (Gallai-type identities) for the swap-distances of any two realizations of simple undirected or directed degree sequences. These identities considerably improve the known upper bounds on the swap-distances.

MSC:

05C07 Vertex degrees
05C20 Directed graphs (digraphs), tournaments
05C45 Eulerian and Hamiltonian graphs
11B99 Sequences and sets

References:

[1] Electron. J. Combin. 18 pp #P234– (2011)
[2] DOI: 10.1137/0110037 · Zbl 0109.16501 · doi:10.1137/0110037
[3] DOI: 10.1088/1751-8113/42/39/392001 · Zbl 1177.05120 · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/42/39/392001
[4] DOI: 10.2140/pjm.1960.10.831 · Zbl 0096.00703 · doi:10.2140/pjm.1960.10.831
[5] Časopis Pěst. Mat. 80 pp 477– (1955)
[6] Electron. J. Combin. 17 pp #R66– (2010)
[7] Mat. Lapok 11 pp 264– (1960)
[8] Graph Theoretic Concepts in Computer Science pp 220– (2010)
[9] Introduction to Graph Theory (2001)
[10] DOI: 10.4153/CJM-1954-033-3 · Zbl 0055.17102 · doi:10.4153/CJM-1954-033-3
[11] DOI: 10.1016/0012-365X(73)90037-X · Zbl 0263.05122 · doi:10.1016/0012-365X(73)90037-X
[12] DOI: 10.4153/CJM-1952-028-2 · Zbl 0049.24202 · doi:10.4153/CJM-1952-028-2
[13] DOI: 10.2307/2372318 · Zbl 0044.38202 · doi:10.2307/2372318
[14] DOI: 10.4153/CJM-1957-044-3 · Zbl 0079.01102 · doi:10.4153/CJM-1957-044-3
[15] DOI: 10.1007/BF02392606 · JFM 23.0115.03 · doi:10.1007/BF02392606
[16] DOI: 10.1016/0016-0032(65)90340-6 · Zbl 0173.26404 · doi:10.1016/0016-0032(65)90340-6
[17] DOI: 10.1016/0012-365X(73)90068-X · Zbl 0278.05115 · doi:10.1016/0012-365X(73)90068-X
[18] DOI: 10.2140/pjm.1957.7.1073 · Zbl 0087.16303 · doi:10.2140/pjm.1957.7.1073
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.