×

Dynamic pricing and channel efficiency in the presence of the cost learning effect. (English) Zbl 1258.91078

Summary: We investigate the impacts of the supply-side cost learning effect on dynamic pricing strategies and the channel efficiency in a decentralized supply chain consisting of a manufacturer and a retailer. The unit production cost incurred by the manufacturer declines as the cumulative output increases. With the manufacturer being the price leader, the interactions between the two channel members are modeled as a Stackelberg differential game, where the two channel members dynamically set the wholesale and retail prices over time to optimize their respective profits. We find that while the cost learning effect is beneficial to both channel members in terms of long-term profitability, such an effect is detrimental to the channel inefficiency caused by price double marginalization. In a setting where the manufacturer sells through competing retailers, we show that the channel efficiency can be improved with the emergence of horizontal competition. Our result also indicates that the channel efficiency with a feedback pricing equilibrium is higher than that with an open-loop equilibrium.

MSC:

91B25 Asset pricing models (MSC2010)
91B38 Production theory, theory of the firm
91A80 Applications of game theory
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Benchekroun, Could myopic pricing be a strategic choice in marketing channels? A game theoretic analysis, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 33 (9) pp 1699– (2009) · Zbl 1195.91008 · doi:10.1016/j.jedc.2009.03.005
[2] Cachon, Supply chain coordination with contracts, Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science 11 pp 227– (2003) · doi:10.1016/S0927-0507(03)11006-7
[3] Chintagunta, A dynamic model of channel member strategies for marketing expenditures, Marketing Science 11 (2) pp 168– (1992) · doi:10.1287/mksc.11.2.168
[4] Clarke, Optimal pricing policy in the presence of experience effects, The Journal of Business 55 (4) pp 517– (1982) · doi:10.1086/296179
[5] Desai, Strategic decentralization and channel coordination, Quantitative Marketing and Economics 2 (1) pp 5– (2004) · doi:10.1023/B:QMEC.0000017033.09155.12
[6] Dockner, Optimal advertising policies for diffusion models of new product innovation in monopolistic situations, Management Science 34 pp 119– (1988) · doi:10.1287/mnsc.34.1.119
[7] Dolan, Experience curves and dynamic demand models, Journal of Marketing 45 pp 52– (1981) · doi:10.2307/1251720
[8] Eliashberg, The impacts of competitive entry in a developing market upon dynamic pricing strategies, Marketing Science 5 pp 20– (1986) · doi:10.1287/mksc.5.1.20
[9] Fibich, Explicit solutions of optimization models and differential games with nonsmooth (asymmetric) reference-price effect, Operations Research 51 (5) pp 721– (2003) · Zbl 1165.91325 · doi:10.1287/opre.51.5.721.16758
[10] Gutierrez, Life-cycle channel coordination issues in launching an innovative durable product, Production and Operation Management 20 (2) pp 268– (2011) · doi:10.1111/j.1937-5956.2010.01197.x
[11] He, Co-op advertising and pricing in a stochastic supply chain, Production and Operations Management 18 pp 78– (2009)
[12] Ingene, Channel coordination when retailers compete, Marketing Science 14 (4) pp 360– (1995) · doi:10.1287/mksc.14.4.360
[13] Irwin, Learning-by-doing spillovers in the semiconductor industry, The Journal of Political Economy 102 (6) pp 1200– (1994) · doi:10.1086/261968
[14] Jeuland, Managing channel profits, Marketing Science 2 (3) pp 239– (1983) · doi:10.1287/mksc.2.3.239
[15] Jørgensen, Production, inventory, and pricing under cost and demand learning effects, European Journal of Operational Research 117 pp 382– (1999) · Zbl 0998.90503 · doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(98)90273-9
[16] Jørgensen, Stackelberg leadership in a marketing channel, International Game Theory Review 3 (1) pp 13– (2001) · Zbl 0992.91029 · doi:10.1142/S0219198901000282
[17] Kalish, Monopolist pricing with dynamic demand and production cost, Marketing Science 2 (2) pp 135– (1983) · doi:10.1287/mksc.2.2.135
[18] Kalwani, Long-term manufacturer-supplier relationship relationships, Journal of Marketing 59 (1) pp 1– (1995) · doi:10.2307/1252010
[19] Kogan, Vertical pricing competition in supply chains, International Transactions in Operational Research 15 (4) pp 461– (2008) · Zbl 1151.91448 · doi:10.1111/j.1475-3995.2008.00645.x
[20] Lal, Improving channel coordination through franchising, Marketing Science 9 (4) pp 299– (1990) · doi:10.1287/mksc.9.4.299
[21] Lieberman, The learning curve and pricing in the chemical industries, Rand Journal of Economics 15 (2) pp 213– (1984) · doi:10.2307/2555676
[22] Lieberman, The learning curve, diffusion and competitive strategy, Strategic Management Journal 8 (5) pp 441– (1987) · doi:10.1002/smj.4250080504
[23] Monahan, A quantity discount pricing model to increase vendor profits, Management Science 30 (6) pp 720– (1984) · doi:10.1287/mnsc.30.6.720
[24] Raman, Optimal monopolist pricing under demand uncertainty in dynamic markets, Management Science 41 (1) pp 144– (1995) · Zbl 0829.90014 · doi:10.1287/mnsc.41.1.144
[25] Robinson, Dynamic price models for new-product planning, Management Science 21 (10) pp 1113– (1975) · Zbl 1231.90252 · doi:10.1287/mnsc.21.10.1113
[26] Sethi, Optimal Control Theory (2000)
[27] Shugan, Implicit understandings in channels of distribution, Management Science 31 (4) pp 435– (1985) · doi:10.1287/mnsc.31.4.435
[28] Spence, The learning curve and competition, The Bell Journal of Economics 12 (1) pp 49– (1981) · doi:10.2307/3003508
[29] Spengler, Vertical restraints and antitrust policy, Journal of Political Economy 58 pp 347– (1950) · doi:10.1086/256964
[30] Quantitative Models for Supply Chain Management (1998)
[31] Wright, Factors affecting the cost of airplanes, Journal of Aeronautical Sciences 3 (4) pp 122– (1936) · doi:10.2514/8.155
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.