×

Convolutions of Cantor measures without resonance. (English) Zbl 1258.28008

The authors compute the dimensions of the sums of Cantor sets. The interest for the support and the dimensions of sums of Cantor sets is a longstanding issue, and has motivated research in geometric measure theory, dynamics and ergodic theory, and number theory. In this nice article, the method is mostly based on ergodic theory.
For \(0<a,b<1/2\), the authors compute the fractal dimension (i.e Hausdorff, correlation, packing) of the measure \(\nu\) obtained by convolution as follows: \(\nu = \mu_a \ast (\mu_b \circ S_\lambda^{-1})\), where \(\mu_a\) is the canonical measure on the central Cantor set \(C_a\) obtained by deleting the central interval of length \(1-2a\) (same for \(\mu_b\)), and \(S_\lambda\) is the dilation \(S_\lambda(x) = \lambda x\). The measure \(\nu\) is supported by \(C_a+ \lambda C_b\). They prove that when the ratio \(\log b / \log a\) is irrational, then for every \(\lambda>0\), the dimension of the measure \(\nu\) is always equal to \(\min( 1, \dim_H(C_a) + \dim_H(C_b))\). In particular, when \(\dim_H(C_a) + \dim_H(C_b) <1\), the dimension of \(\nu\) equals \(\dim_H(C_a) + \dim_H(C_b)\). Hence, according to their vocabulary, there is no resonance between \(C_a\) and \(C_b\), in the sense that there is no gap in the dimension of the sum. A remarkable fact is that it is true for every \(\lambda>0\), not only for almost-every \(\lambda\). The proof is based on two arguments: first a projection argument (\(C_a+\lambda C_b\) is seen as the projection of \(C_a \times C_b\) is some direction), and an ergodic argument enabling them to compute the correlation dimension of the measure \(\nu\).
Finally, it is natural to ask whether the measure \(\nu\) is absolutely continuous with respect to Lebesgue when \(\dim(\nu) =1\) (this question is related to the main questions about Bernoulli convolutions). They show that for \(a=1/4\) and \(b=1/3\), there exists an uncountable set of values \(\lambda\) for which \(\nu\) is singular, attesting once more that there is no easy solutions to this kind of questions.

MSC:

28A80 Fractals
28A78 Hausdorff and packing measures
28A75 Length, area, volume, other geometric measure theory
28C15 Set functions and measures on topological spaces (regularity of measures, etc.)
37-XX Dynamical systems and ergodic theory

References:

[1] L. Breiman, Probability, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1968.
[2] P. Erdos, On a family of symmetric Bernoulli convolutions, American Journal of Mathematics 61 (1939), 974–976. · Zbl 0022.35402 · doi:10.2307/2371641
[3] K. I. Eroǧlu, On the arithmetic sums of cantor sets, Nonlinearity 20 (2007), 1145–1161. · Zbl 1129.28007 · doi:10.1088/0951-7715/20/5/005
[4] K. Falconer, Techniques in Fractal Geometry, Wiley, Chichester, 1997. · Zbl 0869.28003
[5] Ai-Hua Fan, Ka-Sing Lau and Hui Rao, Relationships between different dimensions of a measure, Monatshefte für Mathematik 135 (2002), 191–201. · Zbl 0996.28001 · doi:10.1007/s006050200016
[6] A. Furman, On the multiplicative ergodic theorem for uniquely ergodic systems, Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré. Probabilités et Statistiques 33 (1997), 797–815. · Zbl 0892.60011 · doi:10.1016/S0246-0203(97)80113-6
[7] H. Furstenberg, Intersections of Cantor sets and transversality of semigroups, in Problems in Analysis (Sympos. Salomon Bochner, Princeton Univ., Princeton, N.J., 1969), Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, N.J., 1970, pp. 41–59.
[8] J. F. C. Kingman, The ergodic theory of subadditive stochastic processes, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B. Methodological 30 (1968), 499–510. · Zbl 0182.22802
[9] P. Mattila, Geometry of sets and measures in Euclidean spaces, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, Vol. 44, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995. Fractals and rectifiability. · Zbl 0819.28004
[10] Y. Peres and P. Shmerkin, Resonance between cantor sets, Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems 29 (2009), 201–221. · Zbl 1159.37005 · doi:10.1017/S0143385708000369
[11] Y. Peres and B. Solomyak, Existence of L q dimensions and entropy dimension for selfconformal measures, Indiana University Mathematics Journal 49 (2000), 1603–1621. · Zbl 0978.28004 · doi:10.1512/iumj.2000.49.1851
[12] Y. B. Pesin, Dimension Theory in Dynamical Systems, Chicago Lectures in Mathematics, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 1997. Contemporary views and applications.
[13] R. Salem, Algebraic Numbers and Fourier Analysis, D. C. Heath and Co., Boston, Mass., 1963. · Zbl 0126.07802
[14] T. D. Sauer and J. A. Yorke, Are the dimensions of a set and its image equal under typical smooth functions?, Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems 17 (1997), 941–956. · Zbl 0884.28006 · doi:10.1017/S0143385797086252
[15] H. G. Senge and E. G. Straus, PV-numbers and sets of multiplicity, in Proceedings of the Washington State University Conference on Number Theory (Washington State Univ., Pullman, Wash., 1971), Dept. Math., Washington State Univ., Pullman, Wash., 1971, pp. 55–67. · Zbl 0251.12001
[16] H. G. Senge and E. G. Straus, Pv-numbers and sets of multiplicity, Collection of Articles Dedicated to the Memory of Alfréd Rényi, Periodica Mathematica Hungarica 3 (1973), 93–100. · Zbl 0248.12004 · doi:10.1007/BF02018464
[17] B. Solomyak, Notes on Bernoulli convolutions, in Fractal Geometry and Applications: A Jubilee of Benoît Mandelbrot. Part 1, Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, Vol. 72, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2004, pp. 207–230. · Zbl 1115.28009
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.