×

A Lagrange multiplier test for causality in variance. (English) Zbl 1254.91664

Summary: We adapt the Lagrange multiplier (LM) principle to test for noncausality in variance of financial returns. The new test is compared with a Portmanteau statistic [Y.-W. Cheung and L. K. Ng, J. Econom. 72, No. 1-2, 33–48 (1996; Zbl 0842.62095)]. A Monte Carlo study reveals superior power of the LM test.

MSC:

91B84 Economic time series analysis
62J10 Analysis of variance and covariance (ANOVA)

Citations:

Zbl 0842.62095
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Cheung, Y. W.; Ng, L. K., A causality in variance test and its application to financial market prices, Journal of Econometrics, 72, 33-48 (1996) · Zbl 0842.62095
[2] Comte, F.; Lieberman, O., Second order noncausality in multivariate GARCH processes, Journal of Time Series Analysis, 21, 535-557 (2000) · Zbl 0972.62075
[3] Engle, R. F., Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of U.K. inflation, Econometrica, 50, 987-1008 (1982) · Zbl 0491.62099
[4] Engle, R. F.; Kroner, K. F., Multivariate simultaneous generalized ARCH, Econometric Theory, 11, 122-150 (1995)
[5] Engle, R. F.; Ng, V. K., Measuring and testing the impact of news on volatility, Journal of Finance, 48, 1749-1777 (1993)
[6] Granger, C. W.J., Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross spectral methods, Econometrica, 37, 424-438 (1969) · Zbl 1366.91115
[7] Granger, C. W.J., Some recent developments in a concept of causality, Journal of Econometrics, 39, 199-211 (1988) · Zbl 0174.21901
[8] Lundbergh, S.; Teräsvirta, T., Evaluating GARCH models, Journal of Econometrics, 110, 417-435 (2002) · Zbl 1040.62078
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.