×

Linear growth for Châtelet surfaces. (English) Zbl 1253.11069

In this paper the author proves an upper bound on the expected number of points of bounded height on Châtelet surfaces defined over \(\mathbb{Q}\). Namely, let \(X\) be the rational surface defined by a smooth proper model of the affine surface \(y^2-az=f(x)\), where \(a\in\mathbb{Z}\) is not a square and \(f(x)\in\mathbb{Z}[x]\) is separable of degree 3 or 4.
The main result is Theorem 1: Let \(\rho_X\) be the rank of the Picard group of \(X\) and for a real number \(B\) let \(N(B)\) be the number of points \(x\in X(\mathbb{Q})\) such that \(H(\psi(x))\leq B\), where \(\psi:X\to\mathbb{P}^4\) is the map corresponding to the anticanonical bundle on \(X\) and \(H\) is the exponential height on \(\mathbb{P}^4\) metrized by some choice of norm. Then \[ N(B)=\mathcal{O}\left(B(\log B)^{\rho_X-1}\right) \] if \(a<0\). This result is predicted by the Manin conjecture.
The proof of Theorem 1 uses a method originally due to Selberger and crucially relies on the conic bundle structure of \(X/\mathbb{P}^1\). This allows the author to reduce the counting problem on \(X\) to a counting problem on the corresponding conics over \(p\in\mathbb{P}^1\). The latter is solved by computing the average order of a certain arithmetic function \(\bar{\omega}\) as it ranges over binary quartic forms using a result due to the author and R. de la Bretèche [Acta Arith. 125, No. 3, 291–304 (2007; Zbl 1159.11035)] from analytic number theory.
It should be noted that in joint work with R. de la Bretèche and E. Peyre [Ann. Math. (2) 175, No. 1, 297–343 (2012; Zbl 1237.11018)], the author has verified the full Manin conjecture, including the constant predicted by Peyre, in the special case \(a=-1\) and \(f\) totally reducible of degree 3.

MSC:

11G50 Heights
11D45 Counting solutions of Diophantine equations
14G05 Rational points
11G35 Varieties over global fields

References:

[1] de la Bretèche R., Browning T.D.: Sums of arithmetic functions over values of binary forms. Acta Arith. 125, 291–304 (2007) · Zbl 1159.11035
[2] Browning T.D., Heath-Brown D.R.: Counting rational points on hypersurfaces. J. Reine Angew. Math. 584, 83–115 (2005) · Zbl 1079.11033 · doi:10.1515/crll.2005.2005.584.83
[3] Colliot-Thélène J.-L., Sansuc J.-J., Swinnerton-Dyer P.: Intersections of two quadrics and Châtelet surfaces. I. J Reine Angew. Math. 373, 37–107 (1987) · Zbl 0622.14029
[4] Colliot-Thélène J.-L., Sansuc J.-J., Swinnerton-Dyer P.: Intersections of two quadrics and Châtelet surfaces. II. J Reine Angew. Math. 374, 72–168 (1987) · Zbl 0622.14030
[5] Dedekind R.: Gesammelte Mathematische Werke, Band, vol. 1. Friedr. Vieweg & Sohn, Braunschweig (1930) · JFM 56.0024.05
[6] Franke J., Manin Y.I., Tschinkel Y.: Rational points of bounded height on Fano varieties. Invent. Math. 95, 421–435 (1989) · Zbl 0674.14012 · doi:10.1007/BF01393904
[7] Heilbronn, H.: Zeta-functions and L-functions. Algebraic Number Theory (Proc. Instructional Conf., Brighton, 1965), pp. 204–230. Academic Press, London (1967)
[8] Iskovskikh V.A.: Minimal models of rational surfaces over arbitrary fields. Math. USSR Izv. 14, 17–39 (1980) · Zbl 0427.14011 · doi:10.1070/IM1980v014n01ABEH001064
[9] Iwaniec, H., Munshi, R.: Cubic polynomials and quadratic forms. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (2009, to appear) · Zbl 1219.11055
[10] Leung, F.-S.: Manin’s conjecture on a non-singular quartic del Pezzo surface. D.Phil thesis, Oxford (2008)
[11] Narkiewicz, W.: Elementary and analytic theory of algebraic numbers, 3rd edn. Springer Monographs in Math., Springer, Heidelberg (2004) · Zbl 1159.11039
[12] Neukirch J.: Algebraic number theory. Grund. Math. Wissenschaften. vol. 322. Springer, Heidelberg (1999) · Zbl 0956.11021
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.