×

Endogenous business cycle propagation and the persistence problem: the role of labor-market frictions. (English) Zbl 1241.91065

Summary: Contrasting sharply with a recent trend in DSGE modeling, we propose a business cycle model where frictions and shocks are chosen with parsimony. The model emphasizes a few labor-market frictions and shocks to monetary policy and technology. The model, estimated from U.S. quarterly postwar data, accounts well for important differences in the serial correlation of the growth rates of aggregate quantities, the size of aggregate fluctuations and key comovements, including the correlation between hours and labor productivity. Despite its simplicity, the model offers an answer to the persistence problem that does not rely on multiple frictions and adjustment lags or ad hoc backward-looking components. We conclude modern DSGE models need not embed large batteries of frictions and shocks to account for the salient features of postwar business cycles.

MSC:

91B40 Labor market, contracts (MSC2010)
91B74 Economic models of real-world systems (e.g., electricity markets, etc.)
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Altig, D., Christiano, L., Eichenbaum, M., Lindé, J., 2011. Firm specific capital, nominal rigidities and the business cycle. Review of Economic Dynamics 14, 225-247; Altig, D., Christiano, L., Eichenbaum, M., Lindé, J., 2011. Firm specific capital, nominal rigidities and the business cycle. Review of Economic Dynamics 14, 225-247
[2] Andersen, T. M., Persistency in sticky price models, European Economic Review, 42, 593-603 (1998)
[3] Ascari, G., Optimising agents, staggered wages and the persistence in the real effects of money shocks, Economic Journal, 110, 664-686 (2000)
[4] Barattieri, A., Basu, S., Gottschalk, P., 2010. Some evidence on the importance of sticky wages. Working Paper, Boston College.; Barattieri, A., Basu, S., Gottschalk, P., 2010. Some evidence on the importance of sticky wages. Working Paper, Boston College.
[5] Barro, R. J., Unanticipated money, output and the price level in the United States, Journal of Political Economy, 86, 549-580 (1978)
[6] Basu, S., Intermediate goods and business cycles: implications for productivity and welfare, American Economic Review, 85, 512-531 (1995)
[7] Basu, S.; Fernald, J. G.; Kimball, M. S., Are technology improvements contractionary?, American Economic Review, 96, 1418-1448 (2006)
[8] Baxter, M., King, R.G., 1991. Productive externalities and business cycles. Working Paper no. 53, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.; Baxter, M., King, R.G., 1991. Productive externalities and business cycles. Working Paper no. 53, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.
[9] Baxter, M.; King, R. G., Fiscal policy in general equilibrium, American Economic Review, 83, 315-334 (1993)
[10] Bergin, P. R.; Feenstra, R. C., Staggered price setting and endogenous persistence, Journal of Monetary Economics, 45, 657-680 (2000)
[11] Bernanke, B. S.; Mihov, I., Measuring monetary policy, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113, 869-902 (1998)
[12] Bils, M.; Klenow, P. J., Some evidence on the importance of sticky prices, Journal of Political Economy, 112, 947-985 (2004)
[13] Blanchard, O. J.; Kahn, C. M., The solution of linear difference models under rational expectations, Econometrica, 48, 1305-1313 (1980) · Zbl 0438.90022
[14] Blanchard, O. J.; Quah, D., The dynamic effects of aggregate demand and supply disturbances, American Economic Review, 79, 655-673 (1989)
[15] Boivin, J.; Giannoni, M., Has monetary policy become more effective, Review of Economics and Statistics, 88, 445-462 (2006)
[16] Boldrin, M.; Horvath, M., Labor contracts and business cycles, Journal of Political Economy, 103, 972-1004 (1995)
[17] Bouakez, H.; Cardia, E.; Ruge-Murcia, F. J., Habit formation and the persistence of monetary shocks, Journal of Monetary Economics, 52, 1073-1088 (2005)
[18] Braun, R. A., Tax disturbances and real economic activity in the postwar United States, Journal of Monetary Economics, 33, 441-462 (1994)
[19] Caballero, R. J.; Lyons, R. K., External effects in U.S. procyclical productivity, Journal of Monetary Economics, 29, 209-225 (1992)
[20] Calvo, G. A., Staggered prices in a utility-maximizing framework, Journal of Monetary Economics, 12, 383-398 (1983)
[21] Canova, F.; Sala, L., Back to square one: identification issues in DSGE models, Journal of Monetary Economics, 56, 431-449 (2009)
[22] Carlstrom, C. T.; Fuerst, T. S., Agency costs, net worth, and business fluctuations: a computable general equilibrium analysis, American Economic Review, 87, 893-910 (1997)
[23] Chari, V. V.; Kehoe, P. J.; McGrattan, E. R., Sticky price models of the business cycle: can the contract multiplier solve the persistence problem?, Econometrica, 68, 1151-1179 (2000)
[24] Chari, V. V.; Kehoe, P. J.; McGrattan, E. R., New Keynesian models: not yet useful for policy analysis, American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 1, 242-266 (2009)
[25] Christiano, L. J.; Eichenbaum, M., Current real-business-cycle theories and aggregate labor-market fluctuations, American Economic Review, 82, 430-450 (1992)
[26] Christiano, L. J.; Eichenbaum, M.; Evans, C. L., Sticky price and limited participation models: a comparison, European Economic Review, 41, 1201-1249 (1997)
[27] Christiano, L. J.; Eichenbaum, M.; Evans, C. L., Monetary policy shocks: what have we learned and to what end?, (Taylor, J. B.; Woodford, M., Handbook of Macroeconomics, vol. 1B (1999), Elsevier Science: Elsevier Science Amsterdam)
[28] Christiano, L. J.; Eichenbaum, M.; Evans, C. L., Nominal rigidities and the dynamic effects of a shock to monetary policy, Journal of Political Economy, 113, 1-45 (2005)
[29] Christiano, L.J., Eichenbaum, M., Vigfusson, R., 2004. What happens after a technology shock? Working Paper no. 9819, NBER.; Christiano, L.J., Eichenbaum, M., Vigfusson, R., 2004. What happens after a technology shock? Working Paper no. 9819, NBER.
[30] Cogley, T.; Nason, J. M., Output dynamics in real-business-cycle models, American Economic Review, 85, 492-511 (1995)
[31] Cogley, T.; Sbordone, A. M., Trend inflation, indexation, and inflation persistence in the New Keynesian Phillips Curve, American Economic Review, 98, 2026-2101 (2008)
[32] Cooley, T. F.; Hansen, G. D., The inflation tax in a real business cycle model, American Economic Review, 79, 733-748 (1989)
[33] Cooper, R. W.; Johri, A., Dynamic complementarities: a quantitative analysis, Journal of Monetary Economics, 40, 97-120 (1997)
[34] Cooper, R. W.; Willis, J., A comment on the economics of labor adjustment: mind the gap, American Economic Review, 94, 1223-1237 (2004)
[35] Cooper, R. W.; Willis, J., The cost of labor adjustment: inferences from the gap, Review of Economic Dynamics, 12, 632-647 (2009)
[36] Dotsey, M.; King, R. G., Pricing, production, and persistence, Journal of the European Economic Association, 4, 893-928 (2006)
[37] Dridi, R.; Guay, A.; Renault, É., Indirect inference and calibration of dynamic stochastic general equilibrium models, Journal of Econometrics, 136, 397-430 (2007) · Zbl 1418.62445
[38] Edge, R. M., The equivalence of wage and price staggering in monetary business cycle models, Review of Economic Dynamics, 5, 559-585 (2002)
[39] Erceg, C.; Henderson, D.; Levin, A., Optimal monetary policy with staggered wage and price contracts, Journal of Monetary Economics, 46, 281-313 (2000)
[40] Fairise, X.; Langot, F., Labor productivity and business cycle: can RBC models be saved?, European Economic Review, 38, 1581-1594 (1994)
[41] Fischer, S., Long-term contracts, rational expectations, and the optimal money supply rule, Journal of Political Economy, 85, 191-205 (1977)
[42] Fisher, J. D.M., The dynamic effects of neutral and investment-specific technology shocks, Journal of Political Economy, 114, 413-451 (2006)
[43] Fleischman, C.A., 1999. The causes of business cycles and the cyclicality of real wages. Working paper no. 1999-53, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.; Fleischman, C.A., 1999. The causes of business cycles and the cyclicality of real wages. Working paper no. 1999-53, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
[44] Francis, N.; Ramey, V. A., Is the technology-driven real business hypothesis dead? Shocks and aggregate fluctuations revisited, Journal of Monetary Economics, 52, 1379-1399 (2005)
[45] Galí, J., How well does the IS-LM model fit postwar U.S. data?, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107, 709-738 (1992)
[46] Galí, J., Technology, employment, and the business cycle: do technology shocks explain aggregate fluctuations?, American Economic Review, 89, 249-271 (1999)
[47] Gertler, M.; Trigari, A., Unemployment fluctuations with staggered Nash wage bargaining, Journal of Political Economy, 117, 38-86 (2009)
[48] Gray, J. A., Wage indexation: a macroeconomic approach, Journal of Monetary Economics, 2, 221-235 (1976)
[49] Hansen, L. P., Large sample properties of generalized method of moments estimators, Econometrica, 50, 1029-1054 (1982) · Zbl 0502.62098
[50] Hansen, G. D., Indivisible labor and the business cycle, Journal of Monetary Economics, 16, 309-327 (1985)
[51] Huang, K.; Liu, Z., Staggered contracts and business cycle persistence, Journal of Monetary Economics, 49, 405-433 (2002)
[52] Huang, K.; Liu, Z.; Phaneuf, L., Why does the cyclical behavior of real wages change over time?, American Economic Review, 94, 836-856 (2004)
[53] Ireland, P. N., Changes in the Federal Reserve’s inflation target: causes and consequences, Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 39, 1851-1882 (2007)
[54] Janko, Z., Nominal contracts, labor adjustment costs and the business cycle, Review of Economic Dynamics, 11, 434-448 (2008)
[55] Jonsson, G.; Klein, P., Stochastic fiscal policy and the Swedish business cycle, Journal of Monetary Economics, 38, 245-268 (1996)
[56] Justiniano, A.; Primiceri, G. E., The time-varying volatility of macroeconomic fluctuations, American Economic Review, 98, 604-641 (2008)
[57] King, R.G., Plosser, C.I., Rebelo, S.T., 1987. Production, growth, and business cycles: technical appendix. Mimeo, University of Rochester.; King, R.G., Plosser, C.I., Rebelo, S.T., 1987. Production, growth, and business cycles: technical appendix. Mimeo, University of Rochester. · Zbl 1031.91078
[58] King, R. G.; Plosser, C. I.; Rebelo, S. T., Production, growth and business cycles: I. The basic neoclassical model, Journal of Monetary Economics, 21, 195-232 (1988)
[59] King, R. G.; Plosser, C. I.; Rebelo, S. T., Production, growth and business cycles: II. New directions, Journal of Monetary Economics, 21, 309-341 (1988)
[60] Klee, E., How people pay: evidence form grocery store data, Journal of Monetary Economics, 55, 526-541 (2008)
[61] Kydland, F. E.; Prescott, E. C., Time to build and aggregate fluctuations, Econometrica, 50, 1345-1370 (1982) · Zbl 0493.90017
[62] Kydland, F. E.; Prescott, E. C., Hours and employment variation in business cycle theory, Economic Theory, 1, 63-81 (1991) · Zbl 0807.90030
[63] Liu, Z.; Phaneuf, L., Technology shocks and labor market dynamics: some evidence and theory, Journal of Monetary Economics, 54, 2534-2553 (2007)
[64] Lucas, R. E.; Stokey, N. L., Money and interest in a cash-in-advance economy, Econometrica, 55, 491-514 (1987) · Zbl 0613.90007
[65] McGrattan, E. R., The macroeconomic effects of distortionary taxation, Journal of Monetary Economics, 33, 573-601 (1994)
[66] Mendoza, E. G., Real business cycles in a small open economy, American Economic Review, 81, 797-818 (1991)
[67] Mishkin, F. S., Does anticipated monetary policy matter? An econometric investigation, Journal of Political Economy, 90, 22-51 (1982)
[68] Nakamura, E., Steinsson, J., 2008. Monetary non-neutrality in a multi sector menu cost model. Quarterly Journal of Economics 125, 961-1013; Nakamura, E., Steinsson, J., 2008. Monetary non-neutrality in a multi sector menu cost model. Quarterly Journal of Economics 125, 961-1013 · Zbl 1197.91161
[69] Neiss, K. S.; Pappa, E., Persistence without too much price stickiness: the role of variable factor utilization, Review of Economic Dynamics, 8, 231-255 (2005)
[70] Newey, W.; West, K., Automatic lag selection in covariance matrix estimation, Review of Economic Studies, 61, 631-653 (1994) · Zbl 0815.62063
[71] Normandin, M.; Phaneuf, L., Monetary policy shocks: testing identification conditions under time-varying conditional volatility, Journal of Monetary Economics, 51, 1217-1243 (2004)
[72] Phelps, E. S.; Taylor, J. B., Stabilizing powers of monetary policy under rational expectations, Journal of Political Economy, 85, 163-190 (1977)
[73] Rogerson, R., Indivisible labor, lotteries and equilibrium, Journal of Monetary Economics, 21, 3-16 (1988)
[74] Romer, C.; Romer, D., A new measure of monetary shocks: derivation and implications, American Economic Review, 94, 1055-1084 (2004)
[75] Rotemberg, J. J.; Woodford, M., An optimization-based framework for the evaluation of monetary policy, (Bernanke, B. S.; Rotemberg, J. J., NBER Macroeconomics Annual 1997 (1997), MIT Press: MIT Press Cambridge, MA)
[76] Sargent, T. F., Macroeconomic Theory (1979), Academic Press: Academic Press New York, NY · Zbl 0464.90002
[77] Shapiro, M. D.; Watson, M. W., Sources of business cycle fluctuations, (Fischer, S., NBER Macroeconomics Annual 1988 (1988), MIT Press: MIT Press Cambridge, MA)
[78] Smets, F.; Wouters, R., Shocks and frictions in US business cycles: a Bayesian DSGE approach, American Economic Review, 97, 586-606 (2007)
[79] Taylor, J. B., Aggregate dynamics and staggered contracts, Journal of Political Economy, 88, 1-23 (1980)
[80] Taylor, J. B., (Taylor, J. B.; Woodford, M., Staggered price and wage setting in macroeconomics. Staggered price and wage setting in macroeconomics, Handbook of Macroeconomics, vol. 1B (1999), Elsevier Science: Elsevier Science Amsterdam)
[81] Walsh, C., Labor market search, sticky prices, and interest rate policies, Review of Economic Dynamics, 8, 829-849 (2005)
[82] Watson, M. W., Measures of fit for calibrated models, Journal of Political Economy, 6, 1011-1041 (1993)
[83] Wen, Y., Can a real business cycle model pass the Watson test?, Journal of Monetary Economics, 42, 185-203 (1998)
[84] Woodford, M., Interpreting inflation persistence, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 39, 203-210 (2007)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.