×

Voting power in the EU council of ministers and fair decision making in distributive politics. (English) Zbl 1237.91090

Summary: We analyze and evaluate the different decision rules describing the Council of Ministers of the EU starting from 1958 up to now. Most of the existing studies use the Banzhaf index (for binary voting) or the Shapley-Shubik index (for distributive politics). We argue in favor of the nucleolus as a power measure in distributive situations and an alternative to the Shapley-Shubik index. We then calculate the nucleolus and compare the results of our calculations with the conventional measures. In the second part, we analyze the power of the European citizens as measured by the nucleolus under the egalitarian criterion proposed by D. S. Felsenthal and M. Machover [The measurement of voting power: theory and practice, problems and paradoxes, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar (1998; Zbl 0954.91019)], and characterize the first best situation. Based on these results we propose a methodology for the design of the optimal (fair) decision rules. We perform the optimization exercise for the earlier stages of the EU within a restricted domain of voting rules, and conclude that Germany should receive more than the other three large countries under the optimal voting rule.

MSC:

91B12 Voting theory
91F10 History, political science

Citations:

Zbl 0954.91019

References:

[1] Algaba, E.; Bilbao, J. M.; Fernández, J. R., The distribution of power in the European constitution, European Journal of Operational Research, 176, 1752-1766 (2007) · Zbl 1110.90067
[2] Alon, N.; Edelman, P. H., The inverse Banzhaf problem, Social Choice and Welfare, 34, 371-377 (2010) · Zbl 1201.91045
[3] Banks, J. S., Buying supermajorities in finite legislatures, American Political Science Review, 94, 677-681 (2000)
[4] Banks, J. S.; Duggan, J., A bargaining model of collective choice, American Political Science Review, 94, 73-88 (2000)
[5] Banzhaf, J. F., Weighted voting doesn’t work: a mathematical analysis, Rutgers Law Review, 19, 317-343 (1965)
[6] Barberà, S.; Jackson, M. O., On the weights of nations: assigning voting weights in a heterogeneous union, Journal of Political Economy, 114, 317-339 (2006)
[7] Baron, D. P.; Ferejohn, J. A., Bargaining in legislatures, American Political Science Review, 83, 1181-1206 (1989)
[8] Barr, J.; Passarelli, F., Who has the power in the EU?, Mathematical Social Sciences, 57, 339-366 (2009) · Zbl 1176.91028
[9] Beisbart, C.; Bovens, L., Welfarist evaluations of decision rules for boards of representatives, Social Choice and Welfare, 29, 581-608 (2007) · Zbl 1180.91088
[10] Beisbart, C.; Bovens, L.; Hartmann, S., A utilitarian assessment of alternative decision rules in the council of ministers, European Union Politics, 6, 395-418 (2005)
[11] Beisbart, C.; Hartmann, S., Welfarist evaluations of decision rules under interstate utility dependencies, Social Choice and Welfare, 34, 315-344 (2010) · Zbl 1201.91059
[12] Bilbao, J. M.; Fernández, J. R.; Jiménez, J. J.; López, J. J., Voting power in the European union enlargement, European Journal of Operational Research, 143, 181-196 (2002) · Zbl 1073.91539
[13] Coleman, J. S., Control of collectivities and the power of a collectivity to act, (Lieberman, B., Social Choice (1971), Gordon and Breach: Gordon and Breach New York)
[14] Derks, J., Kuipers, J., 1997. Implementing the simplex method for computing the prenucleolus of transferable utility games, Manuscript (unpublished).; Derks, J., Kuipers, J., 1997. Implementing the simplex method for computing the prenucleolus of transferable utility games, Manuscript (unpublished).
[15] Diermeier, D.; Myerson, R. B., Bicameralism and its consequences for the internal organization of legislatures, American Economic Review, 89, 1182-1196 (1999)
[16] Dubey, P., On the uniqueness of the Shapley value, International Journal of Game Theory, 4, 131-139 (1975) · Zbl 0352.90085
[17] Eraslan, H., Uniqueness of stationary equilibrium payoffs in the Baron-Ferejohn model, Journal of Economic Theory, 103, 11-30 (2002) · Zbl 1051.91009
[18] Eraslan, H., McLennan, A., 2006. Uniqueness of stationary equilibrium payoffs in coalitional bargaining. Mimeo.; Eraslan, H., McLennan, A., 2006. Uniqueness of stationary equilibrium payoffs in coalitional bargaining. Mimeo. · Zbl 1284.91031
[19] Felsenthal, D. S.; Machover, M., The Measurement of Voting Power. Theory and Practice, Problems and Paradoxes (1998), Edward Elgar: Edward Elgar Cheltenham · Zbl 0954.91019
[20] Felsenthal, D. S.; Machover, M., The treaty of nice and qualified majority voting, Social Choice and Welfare, 18, 431-464 (2001) · Zbl 1069.91527
[21] Felsenthal, D. S.; Machover, M., Analysis of QM rules in the draft constitution for Europe proposed by the European convention, 2003, Social Choice and Welfare, 23, 1-25 (2004) · Zbl 1099.91544
[22] Freixas, J.; Molinero, X., On the existence of minimum integer representation for weighted voting systems, Annals of Operations Research, 166, 243-260 (2009) · Zbl 1163.91339
[23] Freixas, J.; Molinero, X., Weighted games without a unique minimal representation in integers, Optimization Methods and Software, 25, 203-215 (2010) · Zbl 1198.91030
[24] Freixas, J.; Molinero, X.; Roura, S., Minimal representations for majority games, (Computations and Logic in the Real World. Computations and Logic in the Real World, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4497 (2007), Springer Verlag), 297-306 · Zbl 1151.91342
[25] Freixas, J.; Molinero, X.; Roura, S., Complete voting systems with two classes of voters: weightedness and counting, Annals of Operations Research, 193, 273-289 (2012) · Zbl 1254.91122
[26] Groseclose, T.; Snyder, J. M., Buying supermajorities, American Political Science Review, 90, 303-315 (1996)
[27] Gurk, H. M.; Isbell, J. R., Simple solutions, (Annals of Mathematics Studies, Contributions to the Theory of Games IV, vol. 40 (1959), Princeton University Press), 247-265 · Zbl 0085.13105
[28] Isbell, J. R., On the enumeration of majority games, Mathematical Tables and Other Aids to Computation, 13, 21-28 (1959) · Zbl 0139.13803
[29] Isbell, J. R., A counterexample in weighted majority games, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 20, 590-592 (1969) · Zbl 0179.25002
[30] Kalandrakis, T., Proposal rights and political power, American Journal of Political Science, 50, 441-448 (2006)
[31] Kaniovski, S.; Leech, D., A behavioral power index, Public Choice, 141, 17-29 (2009)
[32] Krohn, I.; Sudhölter, P., Directed and weighted majority games, Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, 42, 189-216 (1995) · Zbl 0841.90134
[33] Kurz, S., Maaser, N., Napel, S., 2011. On the egalitarian weights of nations. Manuscript (unpublished).; Kurz, S., Maaser, N., Napel, S., 2011. On the egalitarian weights of nations. Manuscript (unpublished).
[34] Kurz, S. Tautenhahn, 2010. On Dedekind’s problem for complete simple games. Mimeo.; Kurz, S. Tautenhahn, 2010. On Dedekind’s problem for complete simple games. Mimeo. · Zbl 1267.91031
[35] Laruelle, A.; Valenciano, F., Voting and Collective Decision Making (2008), Cambridge University Press · Zbl 1173.91007
[36] Laruelle, A.; Widgrén, M., Is the allocation of voting power among the EU states fair?, Public Choice, 94, 317-339 (1998)
[37] Le Breton, M., Montero, M., Zaporozhets, V., 2011. Voting power in the EU council of ministers and fair decision making in distributive politics. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1783938; Le Breton, M., Montero, M., Zaporozhets, V., 2011. Voting power in the EU council of ministers and fair decision making in distributive politics. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1783938 · Zbl 1237.91090
[38] Le Breton, M., Sudhölter, P., Zaporozhets, V., 2010. Sequential legislative lobbying. DP No. 8/2009. Department of Business and Economics, University of Southern Denmark.; Le Breton, M., Sudhölter, P., Zaporozhets, V., 2010. Sequential legislative lobbying. DP No. 8/2009. Department of Business and Economics, University of Southern Denmark. · Zbl 1287.91127
[39] Le Breton, M.; Zaporozhets, V., Sequential legislative lobbying under political certainty, The Economic Journal, 120, 543, 281-312 (2010)
[40] Leech, D., Designing the voting system for the council of ministers of the European union, Public Choice, 113, 437-464 (2002)
[41] Loeb, D. E.; Conway, A. R., Voting fairly: transitive maximal intersecting family of sets, Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series A, 91, 386-410 (2000) · Zbl 0963.05130
[42] Maaser, N.; Napel, S., Equal representation in two-tier voting systems, Social Choice and Welfare, 28, 401-420 (2007) · Zbl 1211.91101
[43] Maschler, M.; Peleg, B.; Shapley, L. S., Geometric properties of the kernel, nucleolus, and related solution concepts, Mathematics of Operations Research, 303-338 (1979) · Zbl 0426.90097
[44] Matsui, T.; Matsui, Y., A survey of algorithms for calculating power indices of weighted majority games, Journal of the Operations Research Society of Japan, 43, 71-85 (2000) · Zbl 1028.91511
[45] Monroe, B. L., Disproportionality and malapportionment: measuring electoral inequity, Electoral Studies, 13, 132-149 (1994)
[46] Montero, M., On the nucleolus as a power index, Homo Oeconomicus, 4, 551-567 (2005)
[47] Montero, M., Noncooperative foundations of the nucleolus in majority games, Games and Economic Behavior, 54, 380-397 (2006) · Zbl 1125.91008
[48] Montero, M., 2007. The paradox of new members in the council of ministers: a noncooperative approach. CeDEx Discussion Paper No. 2007-12.; Montero, M., 2007. The paradox of new members in the council of ministers: a noncooperative approach. CeDEx Discussion Paper No. 2007-12.
[49] Napel, S.; Widgrén, M., Power measurement as sensitivity analysis, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 16, 517-538 (2004)
[50] Napel, S.; Widgrén, M., The inter-institutional distribution of power in EU codecision, Social Choice and Welfare, 27, 129-154 (2006) · Zbl 1180.91248
[51] Napel, S.; Widgrén, M., Strategic versus non-strategic voting power in the EU council of ministers: the consultation procedure, Social Choice and Welfare, 37, 511-541 (2011) · Zbl 1235.91058
[52] Ostmann, A., On the minimal representation of homogeneous games, International Journal of Game Theory, 16, 69-81 (1987) · Zbl 0628.90100
[53] Owen, G., Game Theory (1995), Academic Press: Academic Press California · Zbl 0159.49201
[54] Pajala, A., 2005. Maximal proportionality between votes and voting power: the case of the council of the European union. Tyescript.; Pajala, A., 2005. Maximal proportionality between votes and voting power: the case of the council of the European union. Tyescript.
[55] Peleg, B., On weights of constant-sum majority games, SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 16, 527-532 (1968) · Zbl 0155.29201
[56] Peleg, B.; Sudhölter, P., Introduction to the Theory of Cooperative Games (2003), Kluwer Academic Publishers: Kluwer Academic Publishers Boston
[57] Penrose, L. S., The elementary statistics of majority voting, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 109, 53-57 (1946)
[58] Rosenmüller, J., Homogeneous games: recursive structure and computation, Mathematics of Operations Research, 12, 309-330 (1987) · Zbl 0621.90099
[59] Roth, A., The Shapley value as a von Neumann-Morgenstern utility, Econometrica, 45, 657-664 (1977) · Zbl 0369.90135
[60] Schmeidler, D., The nucleolus of a characteristic function game, SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 17, 1163-1170 (1969) · Zbl 0191.49502
[61] Schmidtchen, D., Steunenberg, B., 2011. On the possibility of a preference-based power index: the strategic power index revisited. Typescript.; Schmidtchen, D., Steunenberg, B., 2011. On the possibility of a preference-based power index: the strategic power index revisited. Typescript.
[62] Shapley, L. S., A value for \(n\)-person games, Annals of Mathematics Studies, 28, 307-317 (1953) · Zbl 0050.14404
[63] Shapley, L. S., Simple games: an outline of the descriptive theory, Behavioral Sciences, 7, 59-66 (1962)
[64] Shapley, L. S.; Shubik, M., A method for evaluating the distribution of power in a committee system, American Political Science Review, 48, 787-792 (1954)
[65] Snyder, J. M.; Ting, M. M.; Ansolabehere, S., Legislative bargaining under weighted voting, American Economic Review, 95, 981-1004 (2005)
[66] Steunenberg, B.; Schmidtchen, D.; Koboldt, C., Strategic power in the European union: evaluating the distribution of power in policy games, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 11, 339-366 (1999)
[67] Sudhölter, P., The modified nucleolus as canonical representation of weighted majority games, Mathematics of Operations Research, 21, 734-756 (1996) · Zbl 0871.90128
[68] Sudhölter, P., The modified nucleolus: properties and axiomatizations, International Journal of Game Theory, 26, 147-182 (1997) · Zbl 0881.90144
[69] Taylor, A. D.; Zwicker, W. S., Simple Games (1999), Princeton University Press · Zbl 0943.91005
[70] Tsebelis, G., The power of the European parliament as a conditional agenda setter, American Political Science Review, 88, 128-142 (1994)
[71] Van Puyenbroeck, T., Proportional representation, Gini coefficients, and the principle of transfers, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 20, 498-526 (2008)
[72] Von Neumann, J.; Morgenstern, O., Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (1944), Princeton University Press: Princeton University Press Princeton · Zbl 0063.05930
[73] Wolsey, L. A., The nucleolus and kernel of simple games or special valid inequalities for 0-1 linear integer programs, International Journal of Game Theory, 5, 225-238 (1976) · Zbl 0356.90080
[74] Yan, H., Uniqueness in random-proposer multilateral bargaining, International Game Theory Review, 11, 407-417 (2009) · Zbl 1193.91059
[75] Young, H. P., A tactical lobbying game, (Ordeshook, P. C., Game Theory and Political Science (1978), New York University Press: New York University Press New York)
[76] Young, H. P., The allocation of funds in lobbying and campaigning, Behavioral Science, 23, 21-31 (1978)
[77] Życzkowski, K., Słomczyński, W., 2004. Voting in the European union: the square root system of penrose and a critical point. Preprint at: http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0405396; Życzkowski, K., Słomczyński, W., 2004. Voting in the European union: the square root system of penrose and a critical point. Preprint at: http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0405396
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.