×

The Banzhaf index in complete and incomplete shareholding structures: a new algorithm. (English) Zbl 1237.91068

Summary: In this global world, many firms present a complex shareholding structure with indirect participation, such that it may become difficult to assess a firm’s controllers. Furthermore, if there are numerous dominant shareholders, the control can be shared between them. Determining who has the most influence is often a difficult task. To measure this influence, game theory allows the modeling of voting games and the computing of the Banzhaf index. This paper firstly offers a new algorithm to compute this index in all structures and then suggests some modelisations of the floating shareholder. Then, our model is applied to a real case study: the French group Lafarge. This exemplary case demonstrates how the float’s structure and hidden coalition can impact the power relationship between dominant shareholders.

MSC:

91A80 Applications of game theory
91B12 Voting theory

References:

[1] Aytac, B., 2007. L’affiliation à une structure pyramidale implique-t-elle des différences conséquentes quant à la structure des entreprises turques? affi2007.u-bordeaux4.fr.; Aytac, B., 2007. L’affiliation à une structure pyramidale implique-t-elle des différences conséquentes quant à la structure des entreprises turques? affi2007.u-bordeaux4.fr.
[2] Baldone, S., Brioschi F., Paleari S., 1998. Ownership measures among firms connected by cross-shareholdings and a further analogy with input-output theory. In: Fourth JAFEE International Conference on Investment and Derivates Aoyama Gakuin University, Tokyo.; Baldone, S., Brioschi F., Paleari S., 1998. Ownership measures among firms connected by cross-shareholdings and a further analogy with input-output theory. In: Fourth JAFEE International Conference on Investment and Derivates Aoyama Gakuin University, Tokyo.
[3] Banzhaf, J. F., Weighted voting does not work: a mathematical analysis, Rutgers Law Review, 19, 317-343 (1965)
[4] Bebchuk, L.A., Kraakman, R., Triantis, G., 2000. Stock pyramids, cross-ownership and dual class equity: the mechanisms and agency costs of separating control from cash-flow rights. In: R.K. Morck (Ed.), Concentrated Corporate Ownership. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill, pp. 445-460.; Bebchuk, L.A., Kraakman, R., Triantis, G., 2000. Stock pyramids, cross-ownership and dual class equity: the mechanisms and agency costs of separating control from cash-flow rights. In: R.K. Morck (Ed.), Concentrated Corporate Ownership. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill, pp. 445-460.
[5] Biebuyck, T.; Chapelle, A.; Szafarz, A., leviers de contrôle des actionnaires majoritaires, Revue Gouvernance, 1, 52-70 (2005)
[6] Bilbao, J. M.; Fernandez, J. R.; Jimenez, N.; Lopez, J. J., Voting power in the european union enlargement, European Journal of Operational Research, 143, 181-196 (2002) · Zbl 1073.91539
[7] Billingsley, P., Probability and Measure (1995), John Wiley and Sons Inc.: John Wiley and Sons Inc. New York · Zbl 0822.60002
[8] Brioschi, F.; Buzzachi, L.; Colombo, M. G., Risk capital financing and the separation of ownership and control in business groups, Journal of Banking and Finance, 13, 747-772 (1989)
[9] Chapelle, A., 2001. Corporate Governance en Belgique: l’effet des pyramides. Bruxelles: Editions de l’Université Libre de Bruxelles.; Chapelle, A., 2001. Corporate Governance en Belgique: l’effet des pyramides. Bruxelles: Editions de l’Université Libre de Bruxelles.
[10] Chapelle, A.; Szafarz, A., Controlling firms through the majority voting rule, Physica A, 355, 509-529 (2005)
[11] Chapelle, A.; Szafarz, A., Control consolidation with a threshold: an algorithm, IMA Journal of Management Mathematics, 18, 235-243 (2007) · Zbl 1153.91615
[12] Cheung, Y.-L.; Stouraitis, A.; Wong, A. W.S., Ownership concentration and executive compensation in closely held firms: evidence from Hong Kong, Journal of Empirical Finance, 12, 511-532 (2005)
[13] Claessens, S.; Djankov, S.; Lang, L. H.P., The separation of ownership and control in east Asia corporations, Journal of Financial Economics, 58, 81-112 (2000)
[14] Crama, Y.; Leruth, L.; Renneboog, L.; Urbain, J.-P., Corporate control concentration measurement and firm performance, Social responsibility: Corporate Governance Issues, 17; 123-149 (2003)
[15] Crama, Y.; Leruth, L.; Renneboog, L., Control and voting power in corporate networks: concept and computational aspects, European Journal of Operational Research, 178, 879-893 (2007) · Zbl 1163.90395
[16] Du, J.; Dai, Y., Ultimate corporate ownership structures and capital structures: evidence from east Asian economies, Corporate Governance, 13, 60-71 (2005)
[17] Dubey, P.; Shapley, L. S., Mathematical properties of the Banzhaf power index, Mathematics of Operations Research, 4, 99-131 (1979) · Zbl 0409.90008
[18] Dubey, P.; Einy, E.; Haimanko, O., Compound voting and the Banzhaf index, Games and Economic Behaviour, 51, 20-30 (2005) · Zbl 1114.91012
[19] Ellerman, D., Cross-ownership of corporations: a new application of input-output theory, Metroeconomica, 42, 33-46 (1991)
[20] Faccio, M.; Lang, L. H.P., The ultimate ownership of western European corporations, Journal of Financial Economics, 65, 365-395 (2002)
[21] Felsenthal, D.; Machover, M.; Zwicker, W., The bicameral postulates and indices of a priori voting power, Theory and Decision, 44, 83-116 (1998) · Zbl 0895.90057
[22] Flath, D., Indirect Shareholding within Japan’s business groups, Economics Letters, 38, 223-227 (1992)
[23] Gambarelli, G.; Owen, G., Indirect control of corporations, International Journal of Game Theory, 23, 287-302 (1994) · Zbl 0815.90140
[24] La Porta, RF.; Lopez-De-Silanes, F.; Shleifer, A.; Vishny, R., Corporate ownership around the world, Journal of Finance, 54, 471-517 (1999)
[25] Leech, D., Shareholder voting power and ownership control of companies, Homo Oeconomicus, XIX, 345-373 (2002)
[26] Levy, M., Control in pyramidal structures, Corporate Governance, 17, 1, 77-89 (2009)
[27] Mann, I., Shapley, L.S., 1960. Value of Large Games IV: Evaluating the Electoral College by Monte Carlo Techniques. Memo RM-2651 The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.; Mann, I., Shapley, L.S., 1960. Value of Large Games IV: Evaluating the Electoral College by Monte Carlo Techniques. Memo RM-2651 The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.
[28] Owen, G., Characterization of the Banzhaf-Coleman index, SIAM Journal of Applied Mathematics, 35, 315-327 (1978) · Zbl 0404.90103
[29] Owen, G., Game Theory (1995), Academic Press: Academic Press San Diego · Zbl 0159.49201
[30] Shapley, L. S.; Shubik, M., A method for evaluating the distribution of power in a committee system, American Political Science Review, 48, 787-792 (1954)
[31] Zattoni, A., The structure of corporate groups: the Italian case, Corporate Governance, 7, 38-48 (1999)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.