×

Metapopulation extinction risk: dispersal’s duplicity. (English) Zbl 1213.92061

Summary: Metapopulation extinction risk is the probability that all local populations are simultaneously extinct during a fixed time frame. Dispersal may reduce a metapopulation’s extinction risk by raising its average per-capita growth rate. By contrast, dispersal may raise a metapopulation’s extinction risk by reducing its average population density. Which effect prevails is controlled by habitat fragmentation. Dispersal in mildly fragmented habitat reduces a metapopulation’s extinction risk by raising its average per-capita growth rate without causing any appreciable drop in its average population density. By contrast, dispersal in severely fragmented habitat raises a metapopulation’s extinction risk because the rise in its average per-capita growth rate is more than offset by the decline in its average population density.
The metapopulation model used here shows several other interesting phenomena. Dispersal in sufficiently fragmented habitat reduces a metapopulation’s extinction risk to that of a constant environment. Dispersal between habitat fragments reduces a metapopulation’s extinction risk insofar as local environments are asynchronous. Grouped dispersal raises the effective habitat fragmentation level. Dispersal search barriers raise metapopulation extinction risk. Nonuniform dispersal may reduce the effective fraction of suitable habitat fragments below the extinction threshold. Nonuniform dispersal may make demographic stochasticity a more potent metapopulation extinction force than environmental stochasticity.

MSC:

92D40 Ecology
39A99 Difference equations
92D25 Population dynamics (general)
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Atkinson, W. D.; Shorrocks, B., Competition on a divided and ephemeral resource: A simulation model, Journal of Animal Ecology, 50, 461-471 (1981)
[2] Barrowman, N. J.; Myers, R. A., Still more spawner-recruitment curves: The hockey stick and its generalizations, Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 57, 665-676 (2000)
[3] Burkey, T. V., Extinction in fragmented habitats predicted from stochastic birth-death processes with density dependence, Journal of Theoretical Biology, 199, 395-406 (1999)
[4] Chesser, R. K., Influence of gene flow and breeding tactics on gene diversity within populations, Genetics, 129, 573-583 (1991)
[5] Chesser, R. K.; Rhodes, O. E.; Sugg, D. W.; Schnabel, A., Effective sizes for subdivided populations, Genetics, 135, 1221-1232 (1993)
[6] Chesson, P., Predator-prey theory and variability, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 9, 323-347 (1978)
[7] Chesson, P., Matters of scale in the dynamics of populations and communities, (Floyd, R. B.; Sheppard, A. W.; de Barro, P. J., Frontiers of Population Ecology (1996), CSIRO Publishing: CSIRO Publishing Melbourne), 353-368
[8] Chesson, P., Spatial scales in the study of reef fishes: A theoretical perspective, Australian Journal of Ecology, 23, 209-215 (1998)
[9] Chesson, P. L., Models for spatially distributed populations: The effect of within patch variability, Theoretical Population Biology, 19, 288-325 (1981) · Zbl 0472.92015
[10] de Jong, G., The influence of the distribution of juveniles over patches of food on the dynamics of a population, Netherlands Journal of Zoology, 29, 33-51 (1979)
[11] (Ehrlich, P. R.; Hanski, I., On the Wings of Checkerspots: A Model System for Population Biology (2004), Oxford University Press: Oxford University Press Oxford)
[12] Fahrig, L., Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity, Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 34, 487-515 (2003)
[13] Foley, P., Predicting extinction times from environmental stochasticity and carrying capacity, Conservation Biology, 8, 124-137 (1994)
[14] Foley, P., Extinction models for local populations, (Hanski, I.; Gilpin, M. E., Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution (1997), Academic Press: Academic Press San Diego), 215-246 · Zbl 0913.92025
[15] Hanski, I.; Foley, P.; Hassell, M., Random walks in a metapopulation: How much density dependence is necessary for long-term persistence?, Journal of Animal Ecology, 65, 274-282 (1996)
[16] (Hanski, I.; Gilpin, M. E., Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution (1997), Academic Press: Academic Press San Diego) · Zbl 0913.92025
[17] Henle, K.; Sarre, S.; Wiegand, K., The role of density regulation in extinction processes and population viability analysis, Biodiversity and Conservation, 13, 9-52 (2004)
[18] Ives, A. R.; May, R. M., Competition within and between species in a patchy environment: Relations between microscopic and macroscopic models, Journal of Theoretical Biology, 115, 65-92 (1985)
[19] Ives, A. R.; Woody, S. T.; Nordheim, E. V.; Nelson, C.; Andrews, J. H., The synergistic effects of stochasticity and dispersal on population dynamics, American Naturalist, 163, 375-387 (2004)
[20] Johnson, N. L.; Kotz, S.; Balakrishnan, N., Continuous univariate distributions, vol. 1 (1994), John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York · Zbl 0811.62001
[21] Johnson, N. L.; Kotz, S.; Balakrishnan, N., Discrete Multivariate Distributions (1997), John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York · Zbl 0868.62048
[22] Johnson, N. L.; Kotz, S.; Kemp, A., Univariate Discrete Distributions (1993), John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York
[23] Klopfer, E. D.; Ives, A. R., Aggregation and the coexistence of competing parasitoid species, Theoretical Population Biology, 52, 167-178 (1997) · Zbl 0890.92025
[24] Kuussaari, M., 1998. Biology of the glanville fritillary butterfly (Melitaea cinxia; Kuussaari, M., 1998. Biology of the glanville fritillary butterfly (Melitaea cinxia
[25] Lande, R., Extinction thresholds in demographic models of territorial populations, American Naturalist, 130, 624-635 (1987)
[26] Lande, R., Risks of population extinction from demographic and environmental stochasticity and random catastrophes, American Naturalist, 142, 911-927 (1993)
[27] Lei, G.; Hanski, I., Spatial dynamics of two competing specialist parasitoids in a host metapopulation, Journal of Animal Ecology, 67, 422-433 (1998)
[28] Lei, G. C.; Vikberg, V.; Nieminen, M.; Kuussaari, M., The parasitoid complex attacking Finnish populations of the Glanville fritillary Melitaea cinxia (Lep: Nymphalidae), an endangered butterfly, Journal of Natural History, 31, 635-648 (1997)
[29] Lewontin, R. C.; Cohen, D., On population growth in a randomly varying environment, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 62, 1056-1060 (1969)
[30] May, R. M.; Hassell, M. P., The dynamics of multiparasitoid-host interactions, American Naturalist, 117, 234-261 (1981)
[31] Palmer, A. R.; Strathmann, R. R., Scale of dispersal in varying environments and its implications for life histories of marine invertebrates, Oecologia, 48, 308-318 (1981)
[32] Palmqvist, E.; Lundberg, P., Population extinctions in correlated environments, Oikos, 83, 359-367 (1998)
[33] Roff, D. A., The analysis of a population model demonstrating the importance of dispersal in a heterogeneous environment, Oecologia (Berlin), 15, 259-275 (1974)
[34] Roff, D. A., Spatial heterogeneity and the persistence of populations, Oecologia (Berlin), 15, 245-258 (1974)
[35] Schmeiser, B. W.; Lal, R., Bivariate gamma random vectors, Operations Research, 30, 355-374 (1982) · Zbl 0504.65005
[36] Strathmann, R., The spread of sibling larvae of sedentary marine invertebrates, American Naturalist, 108, 29-44 (1974)
[37] Sugg, D. W.; Chesser, R. K.; Dobson, F. S.; Hoogland, J. L., Population genetics meets behavioral ecology, Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 11, 338-342 (1996)
[38] Tobin, J., Liquidity preference as behavior towards risk, The Review of Economic Studies, 67, 65-86 (1958)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.