×

Structure versus function: a topological perspective on immune networks. (English) Zbl 1205.92027

Summary: Many recent advances have been made in understanding the functional implications of the global topological properties of biological networks through the application of complex network theory, particularly in the area of small-world and scale-free topologies. Computational studies which attempt to understand the structure-function relationship usually proceed by defining a representation of cells and an affinity measure to describe their interactions. We show that this necessarily restricts the topology of the networks that can arise; furthermore, we show that although simple topologies can be produced via representation and affinity measures common in the literature, it is unclear how to select measures which result in complex topologies, for example exhibiting scale-free functionality. We introduce the concept of potential networks as a method in which abstract network topologies can be directly studied, bypassing any definition of shape-space and affinity functions. We illustrate the benefit of the approach by studying the evolution of idiotypic networks on selection of scale-free and regular topologies, finding that a key immunological property, tolerance, is promoted by bi-partite and heterogeneous topologies. The approach, however, is applicable to the study of any network and thus has implications for both immunology and artificial immune systems.

MSC:

92C42 Systems biology, networks
05C90 Applications of graph theory
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Albert R, Barabási AL (2002) Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Rev Mod Phys 74:47–97 · Zbl 1205.82086 · doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.74.47
[2] Amaral LA, Scala A, Barthelemy M, Stanley HE (2000) Classes of small-world networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97(21):11149–11152 · doi:10.1073/pnas.200327197
[3] Barabási AL, Albert R (1999) Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286(5439):509–512 · Zbl 1226.05223 · doi:10.1126/science.286.5439.509
[4] Barabási L, Oltvai Z (2004) Network biology: understanding the cell’s functional organization. Nat Rev Genet 5:101–113 · doi:10.1038/nrg1272
[5] Behn U (2007) Idiotypic networks: towards a renaissance? Immunological Reviews 216:142–152
[6] Bersini H (2002) Self-assertion vs self-recogntion: a tribute to francisco varela. In: Proceedings of ICARIS 2002, pp 107–112
[7] Bersini H (2003) Revisiting immune networks. In: Proceedings of ECAL 2003, pp 191–198
[8] Bersini H, Lenaerts T, Santos FC (2006) Growing biological networks: beyond the gene-duplication model. J Theor Biol 241(3):488–505 · doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2005.12.012
[9] Calenbuhr V, Bersini H, Stewart J, Varela F (1995) Natural tolerance in a simple immune network. J Theor Biol 177:199–213 · doi:10.1006/jtbi.1995.0239
[10] Carneiro J, Stewart J (1994) Rethinking ”Shape Space”: evidence from simulated docking suggests that steric shape complementarity is not limiting for antibody–antigen recognition and idiotypic interactions. J Theor Biol 169:390–402 · doi:10.1006/jtbi.1994.1161
[11] Carneiro J, Coutinho A, Stewart J (1996) A model of the immune network with B-T cell co-operation. II–the simulation of ontogenesis. J Theor Biol 182:531–554 · doi:10.1006/jtbi.1996.0193
[12] Cohen IR (2007) Real and artificial immune systems: computing the state of the body. Immunol Rev 7:569–574
[13] Cohen IR, Quintana FJ, Mimran A (2004) T-regs in t-cell vaccination: exploring the regulation of regulation. J Clin Invest 114:1227–1232
[14] Coutinho A (2002) Immunology at the crossroads. EMBO Rep 3(11):1008–1011
[15] Coutinho A (2003) Will the idiotypic network help to solve natural tolerance? Trends Immunol 24(2):53–54
[16] De Castro L, Von Zuben F (2000) An evolutionary immune network for data clustering. Proceedings of the VI Brazilian symposium on neural networks (SBRN’00). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA p 84
[17] Dorogotsev SN, Mendes JFF (2003) Evolution of networks: from biological nets to the internet and WWW. Oxford University Press, Oxford
[18] Dilger W (2006) Structural properties of shape-spaces. In: Proceedings of international conference on artificical immune systems (ICARIS), pp 178–192
[19] Dilger W, Strangeld S (2006) Properties of the bersini experiment on self-assertion. In: Proceedings of the genetic and evolutionary computation conference (GECCO), pp 95–102
[20] Frankenstein Z, Alon U, Cohen IR (2006) The immune-body cytokine network defines a social architecture of cell interactions. Biol Direct 1(32):1–15
[21] Guimerá R, Amaral LAN (2005) Functional cartography of complex metabolic networks. Nature 433:895–900
[22] Han J-DJ, Dupuy D, Bertin N, Cusick M, Vidal M (2005) Effect of sampling on topology predictions of protein–protein interaction networks. Nat Biotechnol 23(7):839–844
[23] Hart E (2005) Not all balls are round: an investigation of alternative recognition-region shapes. In: Jacob C, Pilat ML, Bentley PJ, Timmis JI (eds) Artificial immune systems, Proceedings of ICARIS 2005, vol 3627. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 9–42
[24] Hart E (2006) Analysis of a growth model for idiotypic networks. In: ICARIS 2006, Lecture notes in computer science, vol 4163. Springer, Berlin, pp 66–80
[25] Hart E, Ross P (2005) The impact of the shape of antibody recognition regions on the emergence of idiotypic networks. Int J Unconventional Comput 1(3):281–313
[26] Hart E, Bersini H, Santos FC (2006) Tolerance vs intolerance: how affinity defines topology in an idiotypic network. In: Jacob C, Pilat ML, Bentley PJ, Timmis JI (eds) ICARIS 2006, Lecture notes in computer science, vol 4163. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 109–121
[27] Hart E, Bersini H, Santos FC (2007a) Topological constraints in the evolution of idiotypic networks. In: ICARIS 2007, Lecture notes in computer science, vol 4628. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 252–263
[28] Hart E, Bersini H, Santos FC (2007b) How affinity influences tolerance in an idiotypic network. J Theor Biol 249(3):422–436 · doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2007.07.019
[29] Ishiguro A, Kondo T, Watanabe Y, Uchikawa Y (1997) A reinforcement learning method for dynamic behavior arbitration of autonomous mobile robots based on the immunological information processing mechanisms. Trans IEE Japan, 117-C(1):42–49
[30] Jeong H, Mason SP, Barabsi A, Oltvai ZN (2001) Lethality and centrality in protein networks. Nature 411:41–42 · doi:10.1038/35075138
[31] Jerne N (1985) The generative grammar of the immune system. Science 4(4):439–451
[32] Lal G, Shaila MS, Nayak R (2006) Recombinant idiotypic tcr{\(\beta\)} chain immunization in mice generates antigen specific T-cell response. Mol Immunol 43:1549–1556 · doi:10.1016/j.molimm.2005.10.002
[33] May RM, Lloyd AL (2001) Infection dynamics on scale-free networks. Phys Rev E 64(6 Pt 2):66112
[34] McEwan C, Hart E (2008) The problem with shape-space: boosting the immune system. In: ICARIS ’08: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on artificial immune system, pp 316–327
[35] McGuire KL, Holmes DS (2005) Role of complementary proteins in autoimmunity: a old idea re-emerges with new twists. Trends Immunol 26:367–372 · doi:10.1016/j.it.2005.05.001
[36] Newman MEJ (2003) Structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Rev 45:167–256 · Zbl 1029.68010 · doi:10.1137/S003614450342480
[37] Pastor-Satorras R, Vespignani A (2001) Epidemic spreading in scale-free networks. Phys Rev Lett 86:3200 · Zbl 1132.92338
[38] Perelson A (1989) Immune network theory. Immunol Rev 10:5–36 · doi:10.1111/j.1600-065X.1989.tb00025.x
[39] Price DJ (1965) Networks of scientific papers. Science 149:510–515 · doi:10.1126/science.149.3683.510
[40] Santos FC, Pacheco JM, Lenaerts T (2006) Evolutionary dynamics of social dilemmas in structured heterogeneous populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103(9):3490–3494 · doi:10.1073/pnas.0508201103
[41] Shoenfeld Y (2004) The idiotypic network in autoimmnunity. Nat Med 10:17–18 · doi:10.1038/nm0104-17
[42] Stewart J (2004) The affirmation of self: a new perspective on the immune system. Artif Life 10(3):261–276 · doi:10.1162/1064546041255593
[43] Stibor T, Timmis J (2007) An Investigation into the compression qualities of aiNET. In: Proceedings of Foundations of Computational Intelligence, FOCI 2007
[44] Stibor T, Timmis J, Eckert C (2006) On the use of hyperspheres in artificial immune systems as antibody recognition regions. In: Proceedings of ICARIS 2006, Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Berlin, pp 215–228
[45] Stumpf MPH, Wiuf C, May RM (2005) Subnets of scale-free networks are not scale-free: sampling properties of networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:4221–4224 · doi:10.1073/pnas.0501179102
[46] Tanaka R, Yi TM, Doyle J (2005) Some protein interaction data do not exhibit power-law statistics. FEBS Lett 579:5140–5144 · doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2005.08.024
[47] Timmis J, Neal M (2001) A resource limited artificial immune system for data analysis. Knowl Based Syst 14:121–130 · doi:10.1016/S0950-7051(01)00088-0
[48] Timmis J, Andrews P, Owen N (2008) An interdisciplinary perspective on artificial immune systems. Evol Intell 1:5–26
[49] Tieri P, Valensin V, Latora V, Castellani GC2, Marchiori M, Remondini D, Franceschi C (2004) Quantifying the relevance of different mediators in the human immune cell network. Bioinformatics 21(8):1639–1643 · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bti239
[50] Tite JP (1986) Direct interactions between b and t lymphocytes bearing complementary Receptors. J Exp Med 163:189–202 · doi:10.1084/jem.163.1.189
[51] Whitbrook A, Aickelin U, Garibaldi JM (2007) Idiotypic immune networks in mobile-robot control. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B 37(6):1581–1598
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.