×

Background filtrations and canonical loss processes for top-down models of portfolio credit risk. (English) Zbl 1199.91252

The problem of portfolio credit risk modeling is investigated using background filtrations and an embedding via an \(\mathbb{H}\)-hypothesis. The authors focus on the top-down approach. It is shown that, as opposed to the bottom-up approach, in a top-down approach default contagion is compatible with the background filtration modeling approach. This is because in a top-down approach one can exploit the fact that the event arrival times are ordered. Two \(\mathbb{H}\)-type embedding assumptions are introduced: successive property and one-step property and it is shown that in a top-down portfolio credit risk modeling the two assumptions actually are equivalent. A canonical loss process is constructed such that the successive \(\mathbb{H}\)-property holds. It is proved that under weak regularity conditions the assumption of \(\mathbb{H}\)-property is actually equivalent to the existence of a canonically constructed loss process. The conditional Markov model is treated as a special case in which the complete conditional transition probabilities can be computed in closed form.

MSC:

91G40 Credit risk
60G35 Signal detection and filtering (aspects of stochastic processes)
91B30 Risk theory, insurance (MSC2010)

References:

[1] Bielecki, T.R., Rutkowski, M.: Credit Risk: Modelling, Valuation and Hedging. Springer, Berlin (2002) · Zbl 0979.91050
[2] Bielecki, T.R., Jeanblanc, M., Rutkowski, M.: Modelling and valuation of credit risk. Technical Report, Université d’Evry (2003), http://www.maths.univ-evry.fr/prepubli/189.pdf · Zbl 1134.91023
[3] Blanchet-Scalliet, C., Jeanblanc, M.: Hazard rate for credit risk and hedging defaultable contingent claims. Finance Stoch. 8, 145–159 (2004) · Zbl 1052.91036 · doi:10.1007/s00780-003-0108-1
[4] Brémaud, P., Yor, M.: Changes of filtration and of probability measures. Z. Wahrscheinlichkeitstheor. Verw. Geb. 45, 269–295 (1978) · Zbl 0415.60048 · doi:10.1007/BF00537538
[5] Das, S.R., Duffie, D., Kapadia, N., Saita, L.: Common failings: How corporate defaults are correlated. J. Finance 62, 93–117 (2007) · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2007.01202.x
[6] Dellacherie, C., Meyer, P.-A.: Probabilités et Potentiel, Chapitres I–IV. Hermann, Paris (1975)
[7] Dellacherie, C., Meyer, P.-A.: A propos du travail de Yor sur le grossissement des tribus. In: Séminaire de Probabilités, XII. LNM, vol. 649, pp. 70–77. Springer, Berlin (1978) · Zbl 0378.60033
[8] Dellacherie, C., Maisonneuve, B., Meyer, P.-A.: Probabilités et Potentiel, Chapitres XVII–XXIV, Processus de Markov (fin). Compléments de Calcul Stochastique. Hermann, Paris (1992)
[9] Ehlers, P.: Pricing Credit Derivatives. Ph.D. Thesis 17274, ETH Zurich (2007)
[10] Ehlers, P., Schönbucher, P.J.: Dynamic credit portfolio derivatives pricing. Working Paper, ETH Zurich, July 2006, http://www.defaultrisk.com/pp_price_76.htm
[11] Elliott, R.J., Jeanblanc, M., Yor, M.: On models of default risk. Math. Finance 10, 179–196 (2000) · Zbl 1042.91038 · doi:10.1111/1467-9965.00088
[12] Errais, E., Giesecke, K., Goldberg, L.R.: Pricing credit from the top down with affine point processes. Working Paper, June 2006, http://www.barra.com/products/pdfs/pricing_credit.pdf · Zbl 1141.91505
[13] Frey, R., Backhaus, J.: Portfolio credit risk models with interacting default intensities: A Markovian approach. Working Paper, Department of Mathematics, Universität Leipzig (2004), http://www.math.uni-leipzig.de/\(\sim\)frey/publications-frey.html
[14] Giesecke, K., Goldberg, L.: A top down approach to multi-name credit. Working Paper, Cornell University, September 2005, http://www.stanford.edu/dept/MSandE/people/faculty/giesecke/topdown.pdf
[15] Heath, D., Jarrow, R., Morton, A.: Bond pricing and the term structure of interest rates: A new methodology for contingent claims valuation. Econometrica 60, 77–105 (1992) · Zbl 0751.90009 · doi:10.2307/2951677
[16] Jeanblanc, M., Rutkowski, M.: Modelling of default risk: Mathematical tools. Working Paper, March 2000 (contact http://www.maths.univ-evry.fr/pages_perso/jeanblanc )
[17] Jeulin, T., Yor, M.: Grossissement d’une filtration et semi-martingales: Formules explicites. In: Séminaire de Probabilités, XII. LNM, vol. 649, pp. 78–97. Springer, Berlin (1978) · Zbl 0411.60045
[18] Kusuoka, S.: A remark on default risk models. Adv. Math. Econ. 1, 69–82 (1999) · Zbl 0939.60023
[19] Lando, D.: On Cox processes and credit risky securities. Rev. Deriv. Res. 2, 99–120 (1998) · Zbl 1274.91459
[20] Longstaff, F.A., Schwartz, E.S.: Valuing American options by simulation: A simple least-squares approach. Rev. Financ. Stud. 14, 113–147 (2001) · Zbl 1386.91144 · doi:10.1093/rfs/14.1.113
[21] Protter, P.: Stochastic Integration and Differential Equations, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin (2004) · Zbl 1041.60005
[22] Schönbucher, P.J.: Portfolio losses and the term structure of loss transition rates: A new methodology for the pricing of portfolio credit derivatives. Working Paper, ETH Zurich, July 2006, http://www.defaultrisk.com/pp_model_74.htm
[23] Sidenius, J., Piterbarg, V., Andersen, L.: A new framework for dynamic credit portfolio loss modelling. Working Paper, December 2004, http://www.defaultrisk.com/pp_model_83.htm · Zbl 1211.91246
[24] Sidenius, J., Piterbarg, V., Andersen, L.: A new framework for dynamic credit portfolio loss modeling. Int. J. Theor. Appl. Finance 11, 163–197 (2008) · Zbl 1211.91246 · doi:10.1142/S0219024908004762
[25] Wheeden, R.L., Zygmund, A.: Measure and Integral. Dekker, New York (1977) · Zbl 0362.26004
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.