×

Information technology investment decisions under asymmetric information: a modified rational expectation model. (English) Zbl 1175.91054

Summary: In this paper, we propose that information technology (IT) managers make investment decisions about new IT initiatives based on a modified rational expectation model. Unlike traditional rational expectation models, we emphasize the relevance of market uncertainty and its impact on the return of new IT investment. This results in information acquisition decisions by managers that can cause information asymmetry. This information asymmetry is endogenous and so the IT manager can become well informed if and only if it is beneficial to do so. We also capture different levels of IT investment across managers by introducing heterogeneity across managers in terms of different levels of initial capital. Based on a simulation analysis to validate our theoretical model, we find that it is the IT manager with larger initial capital outlay who is particularly interested in acquiring information about their IT investments in order to reduce any asymmetry with competitors. Furthermore, we find that holding other things constant, fewer IT investors are informed when information cost increases and in consequence the difference of investment level between the informed and uninformed investors is more pronounced.

MSC:

91B06 Decision theory
91B32 Resource and cost allocation (including fair division, apportionment, etc.)
91B70 Stochastic models in economics
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] DOI: 10.1145/641865.641866 · doi:10.1145/641865.641866
[2] Stiroh K. J., Federal Reserve Bank of New York
[3] DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.42.4.541 · Zbl 0880.90009 · doi:10.1287/mnsc.42.4.541
[4] DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.43.12.1660 · Zbl 0895.90026 · doi:10.1287/mnsc.43.12.1660
[5] DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5414.2003.02460.x · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5414.2003.02460.x
[6] A. Kambil, J. Henderson and H. Mohsenzadeh, Strategic Information Technology Management: Perspective on Organizational Growth and Competitive Advantage, eds. R. Banker, R. Kauffman and M. Mahmood (Idea Group Publishing, Harrisburg, PA, 1993) pp. 161–178.
[7] DOI: 10.1287/isre.10.1.70 · doi:10.1287/isre.10.1.70
[8] Tallon P., Communications of the Association of Information System (CAIS) 8 pp 136–
[9] Grossman S. J., Amer. Econ. Rev. 70 pp 393–
[10] Barron J. M., J. Int. Money Finance
[11] Sharma D. K., Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decision Making 4
[12] Karlsen J. T., Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decision Making 4
[13] Lim G., Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decision Making 4
[14] Shi Y., Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decision Making 4
[15] DOI: 10.1111/0022-1082.00181 · doi:10.1111/0022-1082.00181
[16] DOI: 10.1016/S0065-2458(08)60644-0 · doi:10.1016/S0065-2458(08)60644-0
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.