Developing new products in a network with efficiency and innovation. (English) Zbl 1159.90373
Summary: When managing a new product development (NPD) problem, a firm needs to consider the cooperation with its strategic partners in a network because surviving independently in the industry is almost impossible. However, due to the large variances among partners in terms of leadership, management, IT infrastructure and organizational cultures, it may lead to poor communication and cooperation and slow responses. A severe impact on the process and outcome of NPD may result. To facilitate buyer-supplier cooperation, suitable knowledge management and product development process management need to be adopted to match the characteristics of the selected NPD mix. In this paper, a supermatrix analytic network process (ANP) model with sensitivity analysis is first developed to select the most appropriate NPD mix. A balanced scorecard (BSC) using ANP with sensitivity analysis is used next to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed model in the execution of NPD process.
MSC:
| 90B30 | Production models |
Keywords:
new product development (NPD); analytic network process (ANP); knowledge management (KM); balanced scorecard (BSC)References:
| [1] | Amabile TM, Harv. Bus. Rev. pp 52– (2002) |
| [2] | Argote L, Organisational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge (1999) |
| [3] | Armbrecht Jr FMR, Res. Tech. Manage. 44 pp 28– (2001) |
| [4] | DOI: 10.2307/3094913 · doi:10.2307/3094913 |
| [5] | DOI: 10.2307/2393807 · doi:10.2307/2393807 |
| [6] | Brown SL, Competing on the Edge: Strategy as Structured Chaos (1998) |
| [7] | DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.49.9.1180.16564 · doi:10.1287/mnsc.49.9.1180.16564 |
| [8] | DOI: 10.1016/0165-0114(95)00096-8 · doi:10.1016/0165-0114(95)00096-8 |
| [9] | Clemen RT, Making Hard Decisions: An Introduction to Decision Analysis (1996) |
| [10] | DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.41.11.1750 · doi:10.1287/mnsc.41.11.1750 |
| [11] | Ertay T, J. Intel. Fuz. Syst. 16 pp 221– (2005) |
| [12] | Forgarty DW, Production and Operations Management (1989) |
| [13] | DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1030.0192 · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1030.0192 |
| [14] | DOI: 10.1016/j.emj.2005.04.004 · doi:10.1016/j.emj.2005.04.004 |
| [15] | DOI: 10.1177/0149206304272291 · doi:10.1177/0149206304272291 |
| [16] | DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2005.05.010 · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2005.05.010 |
| [17] | DOI: 10.1016/j.compind.2005.04.003 · doi:10.1016/j.compind.2005.04.003 |
| [18] | Lawson CP, Technovation 25 pp 1– (2004) |
| [19] | DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.49.4.553.14417 · doi:10.1287/mnsc.49.4.553.14417 |
| [20] | DOI: 10.1002/smj.4250141009 · doi:10.1002/smj.4250141009 |
| [21] | Levitt T, Harv. Bus. Rev. pp 137– (2002) |
| [22] | DOI: 10.1287/orsc.2.1.71 · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.71 |
| [23] | DOI: 10.1080/002075499191751 · Zbl 0940.90532 · doi:10.1080/002075499191751 |
| [24] | DOI: 10.1002/job.237 · doi:10.1002/job.237 |
| [25] | Murtaza MB, Amer. Bus. Rev. 21 pp 109– (2003) |
| [26] | DOI: 10.1080/00207540500031873 · doi:10.1080/00207540500031873 |
| [27] | DOI: 10.1016/j.compind.2005.06.003 · doi:10.1016/j.compind.2005.06.003 |
| [28] | DOI: 10.1016/S0024-6301(99)00115-6 · doi:10.1016/S0024-6301(99)00115-6 |
| [29] | DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2005.12.007 · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2005.12.007 |
| [30] | DOI: 10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00708-7 · Zbl 1099.90556 · doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00708-7 |
| [31] | Prahalad CK, Harv. Bus. Rev. pp 109– (1999) |
| [32] | Saaty TL, The Analytic Hierarchy Process (1980) |
| [33] | Saaty TL, Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process (1996) |
| [34] | DOI: 10.1016/S0166-4972(03)00097-X · doi:10.1016/S0166-4972(03)00097-X |
| [35] | DOI: 10.1002/smj.164 · doi:10.1002/smj.164 |
| [36] | Thimm G, Comp. Indust. 57 pp 331– (2006) · doi:10.1016/j.compind.2005.09.003 |
| [37] | Tong Y, The 2nd Globelics Conference, Innovation Systems and Development: Emerging Opportunities and Challenges (2004) |
| [38] | DOI: 10.1016/S0923-4748(02)00020-6 · doi:10.1016/S0923-4748(02)00020-6 |
| [39] | DOI: 10.1111/1464-0597.00951 · doi:10.1111/1464-0597.00951 |
| [40] | DOI: 10.1016/S0305-0548(01)00068-5 · Zbl 1010.90028 · doi:10.1016/S0305-0548(01)00068-5 |
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.
