×

The effect of time delay on approximate & sample entropy calculations. (English) Zbl 1153.37445

Summary: Approximate and Sample Entropy are two widely used techniques to measure system complexity or regularity based on chosen parameters such as pattern length, \(m\), and tolerance, \(r\). In this paper, we investigate how different values of the time delay parameter, \(\tau \) can be used in conjunction with standard values of \(m\) and \(r\) in the computation of Approximate and Sample Entropy. The results show that for time series generated by nonlinear dynamics that have long range correlation, a time delay equal to the first zero crossing or minimum of the autocorrelation function can provide additional information into the characteristics of the time series that may be useful in comparative analysis. With a unity delay, we demonstrate that Approximate and Sample Entropy are possibly measuring only the (linear) autocorrelation properties of the signal, and these are highly invariant under surrogate data generation methods. Hence when this occurs, the complexity measures of the surrogate and original data are not statistically different.

MSC:

37M10 Time series analysis of dynamical systems
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Bhattacharya, J., Complexity analysis of spontaneous EEG, Acta Neurobiol., 60, 495-501 (2000)
[2] Burioka, N.; Cornélissen, G.; Halberg, F.; Kaplan, D. T.; Suyama, H.; Sako, T.; Shimizu, E., Approximate entropy of human respiratory movement during eye-closed walking and different sleep stages, Chest, 123, 80-86 (2003)
[3] Chen, X.; Chon, K. H.; Solomon, I. C., Chemical activation of pre-bötzinger complex in vivo reduces respiratory network complexity, Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol., 288, January, 1237-1247 (2005)
[4] Fraser, A. M.; Swinney, H. L., Independent coordinates for strange attractors from mutual information, Phys. Rev. A, 33, 2, 1134-1140 (1986) · Zbl 1184.37027
[5] Govindana, R.; Wilsona, J.; Eswaranb, H.; Loweryb, C.; PreiXlb, H., Revisiting sample entropy analysis, Physica A, 376, 158-164 (2007)
[6] Grassberger, P.; Procaccia, I., Characterization of strange attractors, Phys. Rev. Lett., 50, 346-349 (1983)
[7] Grassberger, P.; Procaccia, I., Measuring the strangeness of strange attractors, Physica D, 9, October, 189-209 (1983) · Zbl 0593.58024
[8] Kennel, M. B.; Brown, R.; Abarbanel, H. D.I., Determining embedding dimension for phase-space reconstruction using a geometrical construction, Phys. Rev. A, 45, 6, 3403-3411 (1992)
[9] Lake, D. E.; Richman, J. S.; Griffin, M. P.; Moorman, R., Sample entropy analysis of neonatal heart rate variability, Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol., 283, 789-797 (2002)
[10] Pincus, S. M., Approximate entropy as a measure of system complexity, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 88, 6, 2297-2301 (1991) · Zbl 0756.60103
[11] Pincus, S. M., Approximate entropy as a complexity measure, Chaos, 5, 1, 110-117 (1995)
[12] Pincus, S. M., Assessing Serial Irregularity and Its Implications for Health (2001), New York Academy of Sciences, December pp. 245-267
[13] Pincus, S. M.; Goldberger, A. L., Physiological time-series analysis: What does regularity quantify?, Amer. J. Physiol., 266, 1643-1656 (1994)
[14] Radhakrishnan, N.; Gangadhar, B., Estimating regularity in epileptic seizure time-series data, IEEE Eng. Medicine Biol., May/June, 89-94 (1998)
[15] Richman, J. S.; Moorman, J. R., Physiological time-series analysis using approximate entropy and sample entropy, Am. J. Physiol. Hreat. Circ. Physiol., 278, 2039-2049 (2000)
[16] Schreiber, T., Constrained randomization of time series data, Phys. Rev. Lett., 80, 10, 2105-2108 (1998)
[17] Schreiber, T.; Schmitz, A., Surrogate time series, Physica D, 142, 346-382 (2000) · Zbl 1098.62551
[18] Smith, J. C.; Ellenberger, H. H.; Ballanyi, K.; Richter, D. W.; Feldman, J. L., Pre-Bötzinger complex: A brainstem region that may generate respiratory rhythm in mammals, Science, 254, 726-729 (1991)
[19] Theiler, J., Spurious dimension from correlation algorithms applied to limited time-series data, Phys. Rev. A, 34, 3, 2427-2432 (1986)
[20] Theiler, J., Estimating fractal dimension, J. Opt. Soc. Amer., 7, 6, 1055-1073 (1990)
[21] Theiler, J.; Eubank, S.; Longtin, A.; Galdrikian, B.; Farmer, J. D., Testing for nonlinearity in time series: The method of surrogate data, Physica D, 58, 77-94 (1992) · Zbl 1194.37144
[22] Varotsos, P. A.; Sarlis, N. V.; Skordas, E. S., Attempt to distinguish electric signals of a dichotomous nature, Phys. Rev. E, 68, 3, 031106 (2003)
[23] Varotsos, P. A.; Sarlis, N. V.; Skordas, E. S.; Lazaridou, M. S., Natural entropy fluctuations discriminate similar looking electric signals emitted from systems of different dynamics, Phys. Rev. E, 71, 011110 (2005)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.