×

On the parameterization of the CreditRisk\(^+\) model for estimating credit portfolio risk. (English) Zbl 1152.91608

Summary: The CreditRisk\(^{+}\) model is one of the industry standards for estimating the credit default risk for a portfolio of credit loans. The natural parameterization of this model requires the default probability to be apportioned using a number of (non-negative) factor loadings. However, in practice only default correlations are often available but not the factor loadings. In this paper we investigate how to deduce the factor loadings from a given set of default correlations. This is a novel approach and it requires the non-negative factorization of a positive semi-definite matrix which is by no means trivial. We also present a numerical optimization algorithm to achieve this.

MSC:

91G40 Credit risk

Software:

CreditRisk+
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Barioli, F.; Berman, A., The maximal \(c p\)-rank of rank \(k\) completely positive matrices, Linear Algebra and its Applications, 363, 17-33 (2003) · Zbl 1042.15012
[2] Bürgisser, P.; Kurth, A.; Wagner, A., Incorporating severity variations into credit risk, Journal of Risk, 3, 4, 5-31 (2001)
[3] Catral, M.; Han, L.; Neumann, M.; Plemmons, R., On reduced rank nonnegative matrix factorizations for symmetric matrices, Linear Algebra and its Applications, 393, 107-126 (2004) · Zbl 1085.15012
[4] Chernih, A., Vanduffel, S., Henrard, L., 2006. Asset correlations: A literature review and analysis of the impact of dependent loss given defaults. Available online at: www.defaultrisk.com; Chernih, A., Vanduffel, S., Henrard, L., 2006. Asset correlations: A literature review and analysis of the impact of dependent loss given defaults. Available online at: www.defaultrisk.com
[5] Credit Suisse Financial Products, \(1997. CreditRisk^+\) www.csfb.com/creditrisk; Credit Suisse Financial Products, \(1997. CreditRisk^+\) www.csfb.com/creditrisk
[6] Crouhy, M.; Galai, D.; Mark, R., A comparative analysis of current credit risk models, Journal of Banking and Finance, 24, 57-117 (2000)
[7] Dhaene, J.; Goovaerts, M.; Vanduffel, S.; Koch, R.; Olieslagers, R.; Romijn, O., Consistent assumptions for modeling credit loss correlations, Journal of Actuarial Practice, 13, 165-174 (2006) · Zbl 1192.91187
[8] Embrechts, P.; McNeil, A. J.; Straumann, D., Correlation and dependence in risk management: Properties and pitfalls, (Dempster, M., Risk Management: Value at Risk and Beyond (2003), Cambridge University Press: Cambridge University Press Cambridge)
[9] Frey, R.; McNeil, A., Dependent defaults in models of portfolio credit risk, Journal of Risk, 6, 1, 59-92 (2003)
[10] Gordy, M., A comparative anatomy of credit risk models, Journal of Banking and Finance, 24, 1-2, 119-149 (2000)
[11] Gordy, M., Saddlepoint approximation of \(CreditRisk^+\), Journal of Banking and Finance, 26, 1335-1353 (2002)
[12] Guillamet, D.; Vitrià, J.; Schiele, B., Introducing a weighted nonnegative matrix factorization for image classification, Pattern Recognition Letters, 24, 14, 2447-2454 (2003) · Zbl 1047.68123
[13] Haaf, H., Reiss, O., Schoenmakers, J., 2003. Numerically stable computation of \(CreditRisk^+\); Haaf, H., Reiss, O., Schoenmakers, J., 2003. Numerically stable computation of \(CreditRisk^+\) · Zbl 1095.91032
[14] Horn, R. A.; Johnson, C. R., Matrix Analysis (1999), Cambridge University Press
[15] Jobst, N.J., de Servigny, A., 2005. An Empirical Analysis of Equity Default Swaps II: Multivariate Insights. Working paper, Standard & Poor’s; Jobst, N.J., de Servigny, A., 2005. An Empirical Analysis of Equity Default Swaps II: Multivariate Insights. Working paper, Standard & Poor’s
[16] Kealhofer, S., Managing default risk in derivative portfolios, (Derivative credit risk: Advances in Measurement and Management (1995), Risk Publications: Risk Publications London)
[17] Koyluoglu, U.; Hickman, A., Reconcilable differences, Risk, 11, 10, 56-62 (1998)
[18] Lee, D. D.; Seung, H. S., Learning the parts of objects by nonnegative matrix factorization, Nature, 401, 788-791 (1999) · Zbl 1369.68285
[19] Lee, Daniel D.; Seung, H. Sebastian, Algorithms for nonnegative matrix factorization, Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), 556-562 (2000)
[20] Lin, C.-J., 2005. On the convergence of multiplicative update algorithms for nonnegative matrix factorization. Information and support services technical report, Department of Computer Science, National Taiwan University; Lin, C.-J., 2005. On the convergence of multiplicative update algorithms for nonnegative matrix factorization. Information and support services technical report, Department of Computer Science, National Taiwan University
[21] JP Morgan & Co. Inc., 1997. Credit Metrics. Technical document. Available online at: www.creditmetrics.com; JP Morgan & Co. Inc., 1997. Credit Metrics. Technical document. Available online at: www.creditmetrics.com
[22] Paatero, P., A weighted nonnegative least squares algorithm for three-way ‘parafac’ factor analysis, Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 38, 223-242 (1997)
[23] Paatero, P.; Tapper, U., Positive matrix factorization: A nonnegative factor model with optimal utilization of error estimates of data values, Environmetrics, 5, 111-126 (1994)
[24] Panjer, H. H.; Willmot, G. E., Insurance Risk Models (1992), Society of Actuaries: Society of Actuaries Schaumberg, IL
[25] Reiss, O., (2003). Fourier inversion algorithms for Generalized \(CreditRisk^+\); Reiss, O., (2003). Fourier inversion algorithms for Generalized \(CreditRisk^+\)
[26] de Servigny, A.; Renault, O., Default Correlation: Empirical Evidence (2002), Standard & Poor’s
[27] Wilson, T., Porfolio credit risk: Part I, Risk, September, 111-117 (1997)
[28] Wilson, T., Porfolio credit risk: Part II, Risk, October, 56-61 (1997)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.