×

The optimum simulation method for added damping and stiffness device. (English) Zbl 1138.74307

Summary: Fine ductility, larger cycle of low cycle fatigue and the ability of higher rate of strain hardening are the advantages of low yielding steel (LYS). It is used to develop a new seismic resistance device of added damping and stiffness. To overcome the local fracture problem on steel plate, a newly designed rhombic type steel plate with low yielding steel is developed. The relationship between stress and strain after yielding of LYS is different from ordinary steel. Therefore, the double linear model for A36 steel energy absorber cannot accurately reflect the energy dissipation behavior of LYS under reciprocating loading. In order to simulate the complicated nonlinear strain hardening behavior of this newly developed device under reciprocating loading, the Wen’s model is revised and extended. The principle of statistics is then used to develop the procedure and criteria to demonstrate the correctness of this revised analytical model. The statistical analysis results and the comparison between numerical simulation and experimental data reveal that the modified Wen’s model, proposed in this research, is truly suitable for simulating the hysteresis energy dissipation behavior of rhombic low yielding steel plate.

MSC:

74A45 Theories of fracture and damage
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Housner G. W., Journal of Engineering Mechanics 123 (9) pp 897– (1997) · doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1997)123:9(897)
[2] Chang J. T., China Steel Technical Report, No. 11 (1997)
[3] Shih M. H., Journal of Engineering, National Chung Hsing University 12 (1) pp 65– (2001)
[4] Tanaka K., Hysteretic performance of shear panel dampers of ultra low-yield-strength steel for seismic response control of buildings, 12th WCEE (2000)
[5] Tsai C. S., Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE 119 (4) pp 1222– (1993) · doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1993)119:4(1222)
[6] Tsai C. S., Journal of Engineering Mechanics 121 (10) pp 1075– (1995) · doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1995)121:10(1075)
[7] Tsai K. C., Earthquake Spectra 9 (3) pp 550– (1993)
[8] Tsai K. C., Journal of the Chinese Institute of Civil and Hydraulic Engineering 8 (1) pp 45– (1996)
[9] Soong T. T., State University of New York at Buffalo (1997)
[10] Tsai K. C., Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, accepted for publication
[11] Wen Y.K., ASCE 102 (2) pp 249– (1976)
[12] Sues R. H., Journal of Engineering Mechanics 114 (5) pp 833– (1988) · doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1988)114:5(833)
[13] Boyles R. A., Journal of Quality Technology 23 (1) pp 17– (1991)
[14] Chen K. S., Commun. Statist.- Theory Meth. 27 (5) pp 1263– (1998) · Zbl 0915.62086 · doi:10.1080/03610929808832157
[15] Whittaker A. S., Earthquake Spectra 7 (4) pp 563– (1991) · doi:10.1193/1.1585644
[16] Tsai C. S., in Proceedings of the Second World Conference on Structural Control (1998)
[17] Roussas G. G., First course in Mathematical Statistics (1997) · Zbl 0921.62001
[18] Patnaik P. B., Biometrika 36 pp 202– (1949)
[19] Tukey J. W., Biometrika 44 pp 528– (1957)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.