×

Equidistribution of special subvarieties. II. (Equidistribution de sous-variétés spéciales. II.) (French) Zbl 1137.11043

The goal of this paper is to generalize the results of [L. Clozel and E. Ullmo, Ann. Math. (2) 161, No. 3, 1571–1588 (2005; Zbl 1099.11031)] concerning the equi-distribution of special subvarieties of Shimura varieties.
Given a connected Shimura variety \(S\), one has the notion of special points, and of special subvarieties. Roughly speaking, a special subvariety is a sub-Shimura variety. Every special subvariety \(Z\subseteq S\) carries a probability measure \(\mu_Z\) with support \(Z\).
Whenever \(Z\) is not of the form
\[ Z = M_1 \times \{ x \} \subseteq M = M_1 \times M_2 \subseteq S \]
for a special subvariety \(M\), then it is called “NF” (non facteur).
The author shows the following theorem: Let \((M_n)_n\) be a sequence of NF special subvarieties of \(S\). Then there exists an NF special subvariety \(Z\subseteq S\) and a subsequence \((\mu_{M_n})_{n\in\mathbb N}\), \(N\subseteq \mathbb N\), of the sequence of corresponding measures which converges weakly to \(\mu_Z\). Furthermore, for \(n\in\mathbb N\) sufficiently large, \(M_n\subseteq Z\).
It is clear that in the theorem one cannot replace “NF special” by “special”. For instance, the special points (i.e. the \(0\)-dimensional special subvarieties) are dense in \(S\) for the complex topology.
From the theorem, one can deduce the following result: Let \(Y\) be a subvariety of \(S\). There exists a finite set \(M_i\) of NF special subvarieties of \(S\), such that \(M_i\subseteq Y\) for all \(i\), and such that every NF special subvariety contained in \(Y\) is in fact contained in the union \(\bigcup M_i\). This result should be seen in the light of the André-Oort conjecture which states that the same should be true with “NF special” replaced by “special” everywhere. Compare also the work of Edixhoven and Yafaev in this direction.
As for loc. cit., the proofs of the paper at hand rely on results in the ergodic theory of unipotent flows by Ratner and by Mozes and Shah.

MSC:

11G18 Arithmetic aspects of modular and Shimura varieties
14G35 Modular and Shimura varieties

Citations:

Zbl 1099.11031
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] DOI: 10.4007/annals.2005.161.1571 · Zbl 1099.11031 · doi:10.4007/annals.2005.161.1571
[2] DOI: 10.1112/S0010437X0500148X · Zbl 1077.22014 · doi:10.1112/S0010437X0500148X
[3] Dani S. G., Sci.) 101 pp 1– (1991)
[4] Deligne P., Proc. Symp. Pure Math. 33 pp 2– (1979)
[5] DOI: 10.1007/BF01404126 · Zbl 0219.14022 · doi:10.1007/BF01404126
[6] Edixhoven B., Duke Math. J. 126 pp 2– (2005)
[7] DOI: 10.4007/annals.2003.157.621 · Zbl 1053.14023 · doi:10.4007/annals.2003.157.621
[8] DOI: 10.1007/PL00001616 · Zbl 0872.22009 · doi:10.1007/PL00001616
[9] Milne J., Perspect. Math. 10 pp 283– (1990)
[10] Moonen B., J. Alg. Geom. 7 pp 539– (1998)
[11] DOI: 10.2307/2007099 · Zbl 0065.01404 · doi:10.2307/2007099
[12] Mozes S., Ergod. Th. Dynam. Syst. 15 pp 149– (1995)
[13] DOI: 10.2307/2944357 · Zbl 0763.28012 · doi:10.2307/2944357
[14] DOI: 10.1215/S0012-7094-91-06311-8 · Zbl 0733.22007 · doi:10.1215/S0012-7094-91-06311-8
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.