×

Self-assessment of excellence: An application of the evidential reasoning approach. (English) Zbl 1114.90419

Summary: Self-assessment of performance using the European Foundation for Quality Management (EFQM) Model for Excellence is widespread amongst European organizations. The paper reports the development of a model, based on the evidential reasoning approach from multiple attribute decision-making (MADM), which it is argued helps to reduce the subjectivity of the scoring of an organization’s performance against the criteria of the EFQM Model and brings a degree of science into the self-assessment process. The development of the MADM model is based on the people management criteria of the 1998 version of the EFQM Model and tests have been undertaken using two self-assessment submission documents from a major multi-utility organization.

MSC:

90B50 Management decision making, including multiple objectives
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] AHIRE S. L., International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management 12 pp 16– (1995)
[2] BEMOWSKI K., Quality Progress 28 pp 43– (1995)
[3] COLE R. E., Journal for Quality and Participation pp 94– (1991)
[4] COULAMBIDOU L., Quality World pp 110– (1995)
[5] DOI: 10.1108/09544789710186957 · doi:10.1108/09544789710186957
[6] DALE B. G., TQM Magazine 7 pp 307– (1997)
[7] DOI: 10.1086/209744 · doi:10.1086/209744
[8] EOM H., Human Systems Management 8 pp 113– (1989)
[9] SeIf-Assessment: Guidelines for Companies (1998)
[10] The EFQM Excellence Model (1999)
[11] GODFREY G., Managing the People Side of Total Quality Management: An Audit Tool for Self-Assessment of Human Resources Policies within a TQM Environment (1998)
[12] HAKES C., The Business Excellence Handbook,, 5. ed. (2000)
[13] HWANG H., Multiple Attribute Decision Making-Methods and Applications (1981) · Zbl 0453.90002
[14] LASCELLES D. M., Self-Assessment for Business Excellence (1996)
[15] NOKHAI B., Quality Progress pp 33– (1994)
[16] PORTER L., Assessing Business Excellence (1998)
[17] DOI: 10.1243/0954405001518288 · doi:10.1243/0954405001518288
[18] DOI: 10.1108/13598539810196868 · doi:10.1108/13598539810196868
[19] SIDDALL J. N., Analytical Decision Making in Engineering Design (1972)
[20] DOI: 10.1243/0954405971516347 · doi:10.1243/0954405971516347
[21] DOI: 10.1108/02656719610108341 · doi:10.1108/02656719610108341
[22] DOI: 10.1108/02656719410051643 · doi:10.1108/02656719410051643
[23] DOI: 10.1111/1468-2370.00020 · doi:10.1111/1468-2370.00020
[24] DOI: 10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00441-5 · Zbl 0979.90081 · doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00441-5
[25] DOI: 10.1109/21.310529 · doi:10.1109/21.310529
[26] DOI: 10.1080/09544829708907962 · doi:10.1080/09544829708907962
[27] DOI: 10.1109/21.259681 · doi:10.1109/21.259681
[28] YANG J. B., Intelligent Decision System via Evidential Reasoning, ver.1 (1999)
[29] YOON K., IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 19 pp 21– (1989)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.